By Alan Prendergast
By Michael Roberts
By Michael Roberts
By Amber Taufen
By Patricia Calhoun
By William Breathes
By Michael Roberts
By Melanie Asmar
Court and Spark
Karen Bowers's article on Peter Schmitz, "I Know Nothing," in the May 30 edition, gave fascinating insight into a world almost too bizarre to be true. Apparently, truth is really stranger than fiction. So Schmitz's grandfather, Otto KranzbYhler, who defended war criminals at Nuremberg, thought the trial was an "American farce"? Apparently a contempt for the American justice system runs in the family.
Judging from Schmitz's artwork shown with the story, he also has contempt for the art-buying public.
Your May 30 issue was incredible! Karen Bowers's work on Peter Schmitz was a good job of reporting, and Eric Dexheimer's story "Seeds of Discontent" made what could have been a dull topic--cloud seeding--fascinating. Good work by Michelle Dally Johnston on the Walker Miller appointment, too. This one's a keeper.
Eric Dexheimer's "Seeds of Discontent," the article about the farmers' battle over seeding clouds, is one of the best, if not the very best, Westword stories. Our roots go all the way back to the bonne terre (French for "good earth"). Dexheimer farmed those seeds until he had an excellent article.
Human-interest stories like this and others you have had in the past are all excellent!
Objection, Your Honor!
Regarding Michelle Dally Johnston's "The Senator's Son Was Indiscreet," in the May 30 issue:
In the interest of accuracy, I must point out that the reporter, by error, oversight or otherwise, did not include an important order in her reporting of the pleadings in the Harry Brown matter: By order dated February 10, 1992, Judge Behrman granted Mr. Brown's Motion to Strike (Blundell's) Affidavit and Other Matters.
Pursuant to the applicable procedural rule (Rule 12(f), C.R.C.P.), matters are to be stricken if they are "redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous."
Honkie If You Love DPS
Regarding Eric Dexheimer's "Calling All White People," in the June 6 issue:
Please give the honkies a break and look at the Denver Public Schools figures again. The proportion of white kids didn't start dropping until the late Eighties, when DPS started its anti-kid, anti-parent campaign. Same time the dropout rate went up and test scores started to go down. (And that's not when busing started.)
Ironically, the campaign was blatantly anti-minority. Funny how things work out sometimes.
Eric Dexheimer's sensationalized account of the five Denver Public Schools student profiles that appeared recently in the Rocky Mountain News was poorly researched and replete with reckless and irresponsible claims.
I did not tell Dexheimer that the profiles were part of a campaign by the district to target whites. A glance at the five students--only one featured in the profiles is white--would quickly discount such a claim. I informed Dexheimer that it was the district's intention to select five exceptional students who would reflect the high level of academic and personal success achieved by a good many of our students. Dexheimer's article, in concluding that the profiles were engineered by some diabolical district motive, managed to cast a pall over their efforts.
First, let's clear up one factual error reported in the article. Denver Public Schools' enrollment dropped dramatically from nearly 100,000 in the late 1960s to below 60,000 recently. This year we have 64,000 students. That's 40,000 or so over a thirty-year period, not 40,000 per year. And how did Dexheimer manage to conclude that all these students are white? I can only assume these observations were simply oversights.
But perhaps not. Dexheimer was obviously trying to prove a point that was already clear in his mind before he gathered some facts. His sole evidence for the motivation behind the student profiles was my alleged quote. As I indicated, I did not say what Dexheimer quoted me as saying.
But it is interesting that he did not cite another "administration official" to support his claim that DPS is interested in recruiting white students. In fact, the only other official he quoted was an elected boardmember, who was clearly surprised by the charge. One might wonder why Dexheimer didn't ask the superintendent or other district "officials" if this was indeed the administration's marketing strategy.
Dexheimer could not produce from his notes the quote he attributed to me regarding this strategy. He was, however, able to read from his notes a comment I did make to him in which I conceded that the profiles could be construed as an appeal to those south Denver parents who had moved their children out of the public schools during the busing era. But if that area of the city happens to be predominantly white, it's not clear to me why Dexheimer would presume that our appeal should mean that we are targeting the white residents only. In our conversation, I added that this appeal extended to all areas of the district. Still, Dexheimer was unable to find the gaping hole in his logic or understand why the racist extrapolation he attributed to me was causing me considerable personal anguish.
It also unfairly damaged the reputation of a district whose clientele is 70 percent minority.
For the record, DPS is here to provide outstanding learning opportunities for all its children. The rich diversity in the district is one of our greatest strengths, and the students who appeared in the Rocky Mountain News profiles are certainly indicative of this.