By Joel Warner
By Michael Roberts
By Alan Prendergast
By Michael Roberts
By Michael Roberts
By Amber Taufen
By Patricia Calhoun
By William Breathes
Okay, dyed-in-the-wool sports fans. Here's one for you. Bohdan Ulihrach. Tell us
about Bohdan Ulihrach. Never heard of him? Fine. How about Filip DeWulf? Put together, if you will, a couple of cogent facts concerning his life and career. No? All right, then. Jan Siemerink. That's S-I-E-M...Still coming up empty? Take a shot at, let's see here, Felix Mantilla. No, we don't mean the old Milwaukee Braves infielder. This is the Felix Mantilla who, a couple of weeks back, took out Alberto Berasategui.
Don't sweat it. A lot of people who are supposed to know the difference between a double fault and a double Scotch have never heard of these guys, either--despite the fact that every last one of them now outranks a guy named Andre Agassi in the professional tennis standings. No surprise: Most of them hit the ball even harder than he does.
Andre Agassi. Now, there's a personality everyone knows. Baggy black shorts hanging down to his ankles. Big gold earring. Shaved head. The best court sense and quickest ground strokes in the game. A guy who can hit scorching winners from virtually anywhere on the court. Number one in the rankings, $13 million in prize money. Punked-out, cocky, teen idol Andre Agassi--the co-heavyweight champion of tennis, along with his old pal and adversary, Pete Sampras. Their rivalry is bound to revive a game in bad need of an energy transfusion.
That, at least, was the conventional wisdom in 1995. Today Andre Agassi is ranked No. 75 in the world (his wife's new TV show is No. 4), and he hasn't survived the first round of his last four tournaments. Agassi and bride Brooke Shields have just plunked down two million bucks for a new house in Las Vegas, but since 1996, his match record in big events is a dismal 8-13, and he hasn't reached a final in a year and a half. He's even talking about retirement.
After getting blown off the court last Tuesday in the ATP Championships in Mason, Ohio--by someone else whose name no one can remember--the guy who was once heralded as the savior of tennis had this to say: "It sucks. I'm just not picking up the ball well. I feel like a completely different player."
Whoever he is, Agassi will take another shot at comeback on September 25, when the U.S. Open gets under way on the hard courts in Flushing, New York. Agassi won this Grand Slam event in 1994, and he was a finalist in 1990 and 1995--losing both times to Sampras. But that success--and that budding rivalry--must seem like a long, long time ago, a different world. Today Agassi's game is as tired as men's tennis itself, and a star has turned into a symptom.
There's more tennis on television than ever before, but audience ratings are down. With the retirement of Martina Navratilova and Stefan Edberg (Boris Becker will soon follow suit), there are fewer big names but even more "big games," and the public doesn't like it.
Who can blame them? Is there anything duller in all of sport than watching huge Goran Ivanisevic or powerful Becker smash twenty-five or thirty 135-mile-an-hour aces past some poor devil standing on the other end of the court? Is there anything less interesting than the phenom of the week, equipped with his brand-new rocket launcher, hitting missile forehands up the line, point after point after point? Armed with extra-long racquets made of kevlar or zylon or high modulus graphite, today's male touring pros are not so much tennis players as assassins. Except on clay courts, the finesse and strategy that once made tennis one of the most beautiful sports to watch--even on television--has vanished from the men's game. Sheer firepower, that's the whole ballgame now.
Pete Sampras? He's the world's best player, but is he enjoyable to watch? I don't think so. With his huge serve, laser-beam ground strokes and screaming putaway volleys, Pete's mighty impressive, to be sure. But every time I see this heavily armed automaton do his thing, I can't help thinking you might as well set up a machine gun out there and pull the trigger. It's not Sampras's fault, but men's tennis has sold its soul to the Wilson Sledgehammer and the Prince Thunderbolt.
Who cares if Andre Agassi makes a comeback? Tennis has turned into impersonal, high-tech warfare. Tom Clancy could write an action novel about it--with Bohdan Ulihrach as the intrepid hero.
The slower women's game still looks like tennis--as does the men's when on clay--and from this the game's potentates should finally get a clue. Although wood-racquet retro tournaments have become the vogue among some club players on the East Coast (more game, more feel), touring pros aren't about to give up their space-age weapons for Rod Laver's old woody, and they shouldn't have to. Instead, the game's rulemakers should probably be experimenting with softer court surfaces and slower tennis balls--to put a little artistry back into tennis.
What would you rather watch? Mark Philippoussis blistering a 140-mile-an-hour ace past his defenseless opponent on every other point, or John McEnroe working his way up to the net on three or four varied strokes, then slicing a perfectly placed volley into the corner for a winner? I know, I know. This is the age of bombastic special effects. But isn't there still a place for drama?