Most Popular
Recent Blog Posts
National Features >
LettersPublished on February 04, 1999Momy Drearest If it weren't for the humor of his stupidity, his story would be as pathetic as most losers' stories are. John Rael And Justice for Some Loi Nguyen came here as a child of four. (The letter makes it sound as though he were an adult when he came here, one who knowingly betrayed his opportunity.) He learned English and went through our high-school system. He is as American as it's possible to be with his Vietnamese looks. No doubt his family wanted him to succeed in school. The dramatic success of Vietnamese students is newsworthy because it is not the rule in our society; however, the story of a young teenager (he was fifteen when he committed burglary) who steals what he wants instead of working for it is only too common here. Loi was influenced by American culture. Surely he brought shame to his family and to other Vietnamese people; he must know that only too well. He was caught young, punished thoroughly, and now he's ready to come back out into society. Is he a foreigner? Only on paper. Is he an American? Everywhere except on paper. Should he have the civil rights of a naturalized American citizen? Yes, I think he should. It is a basic civil right not to be held prisoner indefinitely. I once taught for the UN in a Vietnamese refugee camp in the Philippines. There was a refugee transit center in Manila that was much like the INS detention center. Designed for people to pass through in a couple of days, it had a bare minimum of space and sanitary facilities, no place to cook, certainly no educational facilities. After a couple of visits, I discovered a handful of Vietnamese women living there. They had made the mistake of marrying Filipinos. Later, these marriages turned out to be illegal for some reason, and the women were cast into limbo. No longer designated as refugees, they could not return to Vietnam (the government would not accept them); the Philippine government accepted all refugees into UN camps but would not allow them to become naturalized citizens. So these poor women and their children became stateless people. They existed, but they didn't have any laws or any organizations to help them. No one really cared. They were seen as bad women who had caused their own problems. I remember thinking that this could happen in a country like the Philippines but never over here. We are not a third-world country that cannot protect its own people, let alone foreigners. We do not throw groups of people into the trash. We are a humane, civilized society, and our constitution guarantees civil rights even to foreign travelers. The young men in Perez-Giese's story have slipped through the net into a category that was never intended to exist. They are our sons, as surely as if they had been born here, and they must be given mercy as well as justice. Trouble Sprawl Around The activists want to zone and urban-growth-bound and ultra-zone to protect their quality of life. The homebuyers refuse to be denied a chance to improve their quality of life. The activists have put the issue on our political agenda. How will we, the people, resolve the conflict between individual and community rights? I don't know yet, but I suspect that there is no single statewide solution. What pleases Boulder may be objectionable to the people of Byers or Security. How would you, the reader, solve it? David Olson Killer Be Chuck Roessler I am as much a believer in mean-spirited ridicule as anyone, but don't you think four or five pictures of John Elway are enough? If it weren't for Elway and my brother, I would hardly know Denver existed. Think about this as all those out-of-towners pick up your free local paper. Don't bite the teeth that feed you!
write your comment
|