By Bree Davies
By Emerald O'Brien
By Gina Tron
By Jon Solomon
By Drew Ailes
By Courtney Harrell
By Kyra Scrimgeour
At one point during the Wallflowers' November 22 gig at the Fillmore Auditorium, frontman Jakob Dylan acknowledged that "maybe I don't have anything that important to say." But the chuckle this offhand remark earned revealed more about the audience than it did about Young Jake. In truth, Dylan doesn't have anything that important to say, yet his fan base has been convinced otherwise by music writers who have a vested interest in turning this defiantly ordinary tunesmith into (with apologies to Pepsi) the voice of a new generation.
Why? The answer has a lot to do with several of music journalism's dirtiest little secrets. You see, pop-music critics are always looking for stories -- but far too many columnists routinely undertake their searches in the most obvious places imaginable. (Heaven forbid they should actually pay attention to a CD by an obscure act, decide on its quality without regard to its popularity among the public and/or their peers, and research the group's history in an effort to uncover intriguing details that haven't previously been beaten to death. That's too much like work, dude!) Moreover, when a ready-made tale surfaces, such scribes eagerly compromise their analytical expertise in order to gain access, pump up the faux-conflict, or otherwise make their jobs as easy as possible. Would the narrative flow more smoothly if a performer's music was crummy? Then his stuff sucks like a hooker with nothing in her pocketbook but a rent-due notice. The chronicle would improve if an artist's material was good? Then his offerings are more precious than anything in Fort freakin' Knox.
For proof, look no further than the Wallflowers. The combo's recordings thus far have been underwhelming in the extreme, employing middle-of-the-road riffs and timeworn rock tropes in a thoroughly conventional manner. But that hasn't prevented Dylan, son of Bob "The Voice of an Old Generation" Dylan, from receiving the full-scale Hosanna Treatment. Rolling Stone, which once sacked a staffer for refusing to rave about Hootie & the Blowfish at a time when keeping the group happy was fiscally savvy (seems like ages ago, doesn't it?), recently handed its cover over to big-eyed Jake and subsequently named him one of its "People of the Year." (The magazine also argues that the Backstreet Boys' "I Want it That Way" is one of the ten greatest pop songs of the past forty years. I had my money on something by Bobby Sherman.) Likewise, mag and newspaper journos across the nation, including one at each Denver daily, have lately churned out lighter-than-helium pieces about the younger Dylan, focusing mainly upon his newfound willingness to discuss his dad -- a canny move on his part. (By continuing to steer clear of the topic, he ran the risk of frustrating the very folks who've helped him rise to prominence.) These articles refrained, for the most part, from comparing (Breach), the Wallflowers' latest disc, to Papa Bob's top long players, which is only fair. But they also avoided mentioning the CD's towering tediousness, instead portraying it as unexpectedly challenging -- and in a way it is, I suppose. While checking it out, I had to fight to remain conscious.
Granted, (Breach) isn't unlistenable, but the album's generic, been-there-done-that-a-trillion-times-before feel makes it difficult not to see ulterior motives in notices by the likes of allmusic.com reviewer Stephen Thomas Erlewine, who called (Breach) "the finest straight-ahead rock album of 2000." Hunger for the good copy that another talented Dylan would supply may not fully explain such enthusiasm: bandwagon jumping or creeping old-fartism probably come into play as well. Still, the quintet's live turn at the Fillmore suggested that these Wallflowers would never have been invited to dance had their songs and their skills been their only attributes.
Everlast, who preceded the Wallflowers to the Fillmore stage, helped give Santana a little hipness infusion by opening up for the veteran string-strangler's summer tour, and he fulfilled the same role for Dylan; his hip-hop background -- he once led House of Pain -- provided modernist cred, but not so much that it scared off the oldsters in attendance. Unfortunately for Jakob, Everlast was unexpectedly effective, winning over a crowd that clearly knew only two of his songs ("Put the Lights On," a collaboration with Santana from the Grammy-hoarding Supernatural platter, and the set-closing hit single "What It's Like"). With his pleasantly raspy voice and ardent delivery, he gave new ditties such as "Black Jesus" and "Black Coffee" (like most Caucasians with a history in rap, he has some color issues) a funky sonic buzz, replete with DJ scratching and the occasional sample, that sounded plenty contemporary, notwithstanding the acoustic guitar strumming at its heart.
By contrast, the Wallflowers eschewed any and all current touches in favor of classic instrumentation: bass, drums and guitars, with keyboards thrown in for atmosphere. But even though the supporting players (Rami Jaffee, Greg Richling, Michael Ward and Mario Calire) bashed away more energetically than they do on plastic, they seemed to mistake loudness for passion. Sometimes this ploy worked: an encore rendering of the Blur smash "Song 2" that Richling, Ward and Calire blazed through, sans Dylan, received the most exuberant response of the night even as it made the next ditty, the Dylan-crooned "Baby Bird" -- a bonus track from (Breach) -- seem impossibly weak in comparison. Besides, the cliches in which the other Wallflowers trucked (Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers organ fills, slide solos straight from late-'70s Jackson Browne recordings) were only partially their fault. Dylan is the songwriter, after all, and his compositions rigorously hew to predictability, taking the most obvious turns at the most obvious times.