-
Luke 03/23/2009 6:04:00 AM
In late March 2009, the federal appeal court(10th Circuit), affirmed the dismissal of all the large number of Jack Grynberg's qui tam actions. This rubber stamp(appeal court) was of a federal judge in Wyoming, in Cheney's home town of Casper Wyoming, an oily friendly situs, where all of Grynberg's suits were sent for disposal, and deep sixing.
A jurisdictional bar means no merits of any claim were even looked at, the court imposed a "jurisdictional bar" to prevent any court from even looking at the nature of any fraud on federal accounts in the MMS(Dept of Interior)
Grynberg(a self described oil business tycoon) says he spent $ 20 million, all to get a "jurisdictional bar", to shield any rectification of a giant fraud on federal accounts. Sad, the lack of accountability in the USA
-
Madison 01/13/2009 8:04:00 AM
In Nov 2007, this headline appeared in an AP article:
"US court slashes $3.6 billion verdict against Exxon Mobil in natural gas royalties case
The Associated PressPublished: November 1, 2007
MONTGOMERY, Alabama: The Alabama Supreme Court on Thursday threw out nearly all of a record $3.6 billion (�2.5 billion) verdict that the state government won against Exxon Mobil Corp. in a dispute over natural gas royalties.
In an 8-1 decision, the state's highest court awarded Alabama $51.9 million (�35.98 million) in compensatory damages. The court threw out all punitive damages, which made up most of the $3.6 billion (�2.5 billion) verdict, the largest ever in Alabama.
The state conservation department had sued Exxon Mobil, saying it had intentionally underpaid the state for royalties due from natural gas wells the company drilled in state-owned waters along the Alabama coast. Exxon Mobil, the world's biggest publicly traded oil company, argued that no fraud was involved and the case was a routine contract dispute\
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/11/01/business/NA-FIN-US-Exxon-Mobil-Gas-Royalties.php
While Exxon was making billions in profits, it gets courts to throw out billion jury verdicts, adn other rulings.
POGO took the number before the court reduced the award to peanuts, to give big oil a licesne to steal.
For oil companies , they figure it pays to cheat public Agencies, and accountability in MMS is a joke.
Westword, swallowed POGO's numbers which don't account for the reality of how big int'l oil has been able to litigate its way to have no accountability on Public accounts, with its 7 sisters, like Shell Oil, BP etc.
-
Brady 01/12/2009 7:33:00 AM
This is the news on the Parry litigation:
"Oct. 27, 2003--DURANGO, Colo.--BP America Production Co. has improperly deducted costs from payments to 4,000 gas-royalty owners in La Plata and Archuleta counties since 1991, according to a recent court ruling. But it could be years before damages are determined and awarded in the case.
Tens of millions of dollars in royalties and interest on unpaid royalties are at stake, said the plaintiffs' attorney, Bob Miller. The figure could rise to more than $100 million.
Sheep ranchers Linda and Richard Parry filed the lawsuit in 1994 after Amoco Production Co., now part of BP, nearly halved their royalty payments."
This law suit involved federal leases in Colorado.
The state(State of Colorado) sure did not sue, and BP has gone out of its way to try and make mince meat of its obligations on federal lease production to go on a cheating rampage. Improper deductions on royalities were out of control by oil companeis in the Rockies.
Now, to see them getting a pass on a global basis if all those jurisdictional bars are imposed, that is really a travesty. Apparently, MMS(Dept of Interior) doesn't care if federal accounts on federal natural gas production lands are ripped off. SAD--for American that is, when a London company comes onto lands in America and makes a mockery of accountability.
-
Wilson 01/10/2009 1:32:00 AM
Westword's piece cites some claimed POGO study which tagged $ 11 billion in oil company settlements linked to States, Tribes, Feds. POGO is a non-profit in D. C, who claims it supports whistleblowers But, it has never had a jury trial in the ORGs existence. Simply, it is not a law firm, it deals in P R to get donations, for some non-profit trips.
POGO fed Westword some bull, and it is misleading, the States in the Rockies(Owens Administration etc) have fallen down on the job, and if Pendergrast can cite one big State suit against massive oil company cheating on public lands, he sure never laid it out, as to Colorado, New Mexico etc. Governor Ritter or the CO AG(John Suthers) have never sued some large oil company for cheating on public lands in Colorado, Westword, seems unable to point to any such big suits filed by the State.
Alabama(State of) sued Exxon, got a hugh jury award, with big punitive damages. Then, the punitive damages of a large amount was set aside(on appeal), and then the DOJ indicted the ex Governor of Alabama, whose Administraion launched the suit against Exxon. POGO might want to break down its figures if it is purporting to deal in the Rockies, if it is having papers here(Co) make broad statements that don't hold water.
POGO was sued by the DOJ---it wanted money dripped to POGO from some Mobil deal, just before Mobil OIL was gobbled up by Exxon, as the old Rockerfeller empire was put back together, post the Monopoly breakups before.
A ruling in Texas found POGO never got jurisdiction over its complaint in Texas. That is the POGO experience in court--a big jurisdictional bar, as it was represenated by the son of a GOP Congressman, from some Utah(based) law firm.
Ya, throw in Utah, any big law suits by the State of Utah, against BP, etc big oil...They sure never hit the news, but how all this stuff from D C is floated into Westword world, that don't add up, that is most curious.
-
Randy 01/09/2009 9:27:00 AM
There has been none who have pointed to any major law suits by states in the Rockies against big Natural Gas producers in recent years. POGO floats out all those disclosures to the PRESS(which it swallows), and public disclosures are what is used to invoke jurisdictional bars---to bar suits in court.
POGO was sued by the DOJ MAIN DC, U S v POGO wanting some money back in some weird settlement POGO was put in the middle of in Texas. POGO is not a kick-arse law firm.(it is some NON-profit in D. C) Some have sued BP, in CO but it was not POGO, & it was not the State of Colorado.
All this fighting mad headlines, obscures, the swamps and quick sands of jurisdictional bars, which takes out any fight to get to the bottom of matters.
Jack the Headline grabber got his W-word headlines, he may be correct there is billions of bucks in rip offs on federal lands, but there is no rectification of it...so what exists now is a license to rip off public lands.
The 1986 FCA(which Jack used in his trip down nowhere river) is a farce, it is subject to some interesting pieces like "Carved in Stone", but then why hasn't any looked into the nature of jurisdictional bars, and how they hurt accountability, given Denver is the jurisdictional bar capital of the USA, with barred law suits(against the likes of BP and BIG Int'l OIL), but a lot of fighting mad-JACK headlines--that gloss over matters, in the way there is, that is really a lack of accountability, and the State Officials(with public trust duties) seems to be uncaring on matters, as it drops the ball.
Westword has not reported on any big law suit any political Colorado AG, or the Governors office, has filed on some cheating oil company. It(its politicians) is too busy looking for PAC $$$$
POGO is out to lunch on the P R it floats, in many instances---floated by the way from the D. C beltway.
-
Madoca 01/09/2009 12:04:00 AM
Yes, Jack the "lone ranger", as so tagged by Alan Pendergast, post Irgun hired gun from Scotland,
taking precious time away from his Russian concession trips to file papers in the Rockies, it all has the sound of some fairy tale story, with a Bermuda twist, between a Perry Mason T. V series, shot in the Denver chambers(LIVE from Alice in Wonderland)
See; THIS TOO
COMPANY NEWS; B.P. Agrees to Pay $185 Million to Alaska
From News, NYT: "Alaska's largest oil producer, the British Petroleum Company, has agreed to pay $185 million to settle a 14-year-old lawsuit accusing it of cheating the state out of North Slope oil royalties.
The settlement, which was announced on Thursday, was the second largest negotiated in the case brought by the state against 12 oil companies.
The $185 million represents about 55 percent of the $335 million total the state was seeking from B. P. in royalties and interest.
Last summer, ARCO Alaska Inc. paid $287 million to settle its case. The state had said the company, a unit of the Los Angeles-based ARCO, owed at least $320 million in back royalties and interest. A lump-sum payment from B. P. is due ..
Yet In the Rockies all that the States get are jurisdictional bars, and pieces on Carved in Stone, call Gov Ritter and ask his about what a jurisdictional bar is he supposedly has some C U sheep skin, J D, he should know if Alan Pendergast don't ! BP big natural gas producer in Rockies, most evidently so.
Colordo public schools and the new U S Senator and the problems brewing, going to be a lot on the 2009 radars...
-
Igor 01/08/2009 11:25:00 PM
Yes, a googling of jumping Jack--Jack Grynberg produced some strange stuff, like he claims the money BP used in bribes, are his mula, as in in the Russian meesses that are noted in:
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/natural_resources/article3602098.ece
As any survey of natural gas production in the Rockies(USA) reflect, BP is the big operator, producer, as it is on the North Slope. THE BIG DOG IN NATURAL GAS removal from FEDERAL LANDS.... PERIOD.
It is not even headquartered in the USA, but has its operations in London, England.(with Sir Lord John Brown), who Grynberg had some relationship, strange as it was, indeed, and put in a legal complaint filed in court(by jumping jack around)
Why isn't Westword, and its Houston sister operations following all of the money which Jack Grynberg claims he has interwoved(with other ties) with BP----as over 70 jurisdictional bars are about to be imposed to block Courts in America to even look at the fraud against USA accounts on federal lands.
This is happening at a time Colorado is facing an over $ 600 million budget deficit.( Dire situation on the horizon)
Guess what W-Word, 1/2 of the royality on federal lands is paid to the state under USA law(required by statute), so every dime the USA is cheated in Colorado, or other places in the Rockies, that is 5 cents, or a 50 % hit on the States.(Colorao's ox is getting gored, oh, is it ever).
Yet, private parties(persons) in Wyo and other places brought class actiosn on(against) BP and other oil company cheating, and a lot of those suits were not barred on jurisdictioal grounds, it involved the same federal leases, and same production from federal lands(FEDERAL LEASES). An attorney in Durango is an expert on how BP cheated on federal lands. He even testified before the Co legislature, when big oil was trying some slick games to undermine market based accounting in Co. Why hasn't W-wrod contacted him....
SAD, W-word has not reported on that, and really followed the money, as it does some Carved in Stone litnany.
It is Colorado who is getting carved up--- as jurisdictional bars were running amuck.
Sad, such a giant foreign corporation like BP can stick it to this state.
W-word, and Alan Pend...., you need to reprogram you investigations to get real as to what has really been going on, it is maddening all ths stuff you have ignored.
A jurisdictional bar is not a law suit order to allow any suit on the merits, it means the court had not one ounce of authority to even look at the merits, in all the paper Grynberg flooded through the Court system in Cheney's home town: Casper, Wyoming...
How dicey, Cheney, BP, The Russians, Jacko, the IRGUN, hired gun, and billions missing from State budgets, as the Rocky States fall on hard times...
Please Westword, try and get tuned into the real world, not all the stuff Jack the publcist was feeding you on IRGUN terror plots, and Scotland back when..... and the concessions on the other, or banks of the Russian tar pits.... try zoning in on America, and what has gone on..BP does not own USA federal lands, it is a leasee, Xrist almighty, don't the WESTWORD weekly reporters have a clue on that.
Repeat, BP does not own federal lands in the USA... The United States of America does, and Colorado has a large % interest in the royalty revenue from those federal lands.
A jurisdictional bar---just bars a court from looking at the merits, but seems some have never noted the consequences---to the PUBLIC SCHOOLS in Colorado, which are now some of the worst funded in America, putting the kids here---Colordo at risk.
I hope the Governor of Colorado pulls his head out on this problem...soon. BP (reps)sure got a seat behind closed doors with Cheney, and soon, his mess is going to hit the Rockies like a carved Stone falling out of the sky.
-
Ivan 01/08/2009 7:33:00 AM
What is going on;
One section in Denver writes Jack Gyn is fighting mad.
Then, the Wkeely-corporations sister in Houston is going into all the BP/ Jack flows of money in the Cock-lock-a stains.
Xrist almighty, what is all this stuff.
Is the right arm of the paper paying attention to what the left arm is up to, or comparing notes.
Get this through your carved in Stone Rigs:
Over 70 qui tam actions means if they are all barred, no court can even look at the allegations filed in some piece of papers flooded through the Rocky Court system,( a jurisdictional bar means the Court can not consider the merits..) Black letter law 101... are you all being played as a sucker in Jack P R World..
Who is the big dog in the oil patch on natual gas.....productions.. Ya, Ringo, BP.
Cheney knows that as did his energy panel(his secret behind the OILY doors, recall)
Fighting mad.... ya, real good, but at who, one can't fight into the depths of anything if a jurisdictioal bar.
When is Allen P-gas, going to figure that out ?
He seems like some publicist for Jumping Jack, who he tagged the "oil tycoon", IRGUN top gun, from Scotland Yards,
or whatever tag fits the latest Pink Panther Peter sellers script of the week.
Could you all in Denver and Houston for the Westword sistership compare some notes, was BP's working interests involved in any of the suits that Grynberg put a qui tam label on... YA, BP the big operator(NAT GAS), and is JACK in the Cock-icky-stains, and other world beats...for what, and who etc, real deal... Maybe time for a look that cuts out the Peter Sellers Inspector Closeau lines, and looks at some hard core facts, or is that not in the cards: 2009
-
Morris 12/28/2008 7:48:00 AM
About all of Jack Grynberg's qui tam actions were dismissed---on jurisdictional grounds. Lots and lots of them, 10's and 10's and 10's and 10s of them.. Meaning the judge---in Cheney's home town in Wyoming--- never could look at the merits. Doesn't Westword(weekly) reporters know that.
All that "fighting mad", missed the reality.
If one can't get into the merits, and an legal action is barred on jurisdictional grounds , there is not much of a fight.
Mad, some are made at Bernie Madoff---that is mad. they will get into the merits of the swindle: Big Time.
But on fighting mad, is that some more cute Westword slogans to "carve" up any who file a qui tam action, only to have it barred on jurisdictional grounds.
Jack ---the fighting Irgun at age 15--- is the King of jurisdictional bars, in America.
Is that what Westword considers some big OIL heavy duty litigation. Sad, Westword is clueless, it seems to have no clue on what a jurisdictional bar is, or its implications.
Westword reporting on this is madening. But, it is not truly and fully informative to America.
Some oil industry lacky Congressmen wanted a False Claims Act that would turn the Press against relators... Did they find their guy in the Westword Alan pieces ?
Sorry, Westword needs to wise up, or this problem is not likely to go away, no matter how mad Westword paints people.
Ya, Denver the oid Oil patch town, the Petro club, its mining Law Firms, with lots of booty to throw around...
-
Desperate Landowner 10/21/2008 8:09:00 PM
Up to this point in time, I thought no one knew about legalized theft of natural gas. Our area had gas wells for two years, they stopped producing on the same day. They were sold to a company from Texas which is a storage pipeline company. This company went to FERC to store natural gas. FERC never looked at records to see if the wells which only produced two years were really depleted. FERC took their word. FERC is not making this company put meters at each injection/withdrawal well, they said it is more efficient to just have one meter. Landowners discovered the Marcellus Shale lies on top of the Oriskany where natural gas will be stored. Landowners are forced to take a one time payment for what this private company from Texas states is remaining in those wells which only lasted two years. Landowners looks at the well logs and see that the Marcellus Shale is up to 209 ft thick and 111 ft above the Oriskany storage field. We were told the wells would be metered but FERC has allowed this company to do whatever they wanted to do based on an oath. Go to ferc.gov, go to elibrary, bring up docket CP08-15 and look at the landowner comments. Have fun trying to get into the elibrary, it is like San Quentin. Once you get in, you will see the landowner stories of despair knowing natural gas is going to be stolen legally if FERC doesn't change the way they do business with these companies.