Receive Weekly Email and Text Message Updates:
Sign up for latest info on concerts, dining, promotions and more!
Go!

Related Stories ...

Reader's Picks

Top Recommendations

A short list of Denver's most popular hot spots.
user content provided by: LikeMe.net & Westword

National Features >

  • City Pages

    Michele Bachmann, Unmuzzled

    You don't need to read Sarah Palin's book to hear the ravings of a mad woman.

    By Matt Snyders

  • Miami New Times

    Pimp Daddy

    The rise and fall of a chubby sex-cult leader.

    By Natalie O'Neill

  • Riverfront Times

    Babe 'n' Arms

    Tom was a hot-tempered cross-dresser with a garage full of guns--and then he became Rachel.

    By Nicholas Phillips

  • Dallas Observer

    The Fight for Texas

    Rick Perry and Kay Bailey Hutchison are locked in a battle over the soul of the GOP. They're also running for governor.

    By Sam Merten

Joe Bonamassa

This blues revisionist insists that the genre must progress or die out.

Share

  • rss

By Glenn BurnSilver

Published on January 24, 2007 at 11:40am

Joe Bonamassa is caught between the blues and a hard place. A nouveau bluesman, he favors a hybrid blues-rock sound that employs simple song structures and puts the emphasis on powerful fretwork. Such an approach was fresh back in the '60s, when British players such as John Mayall, Jeff Beck and Peter Green co-opted American blues and applied a heavier edge to it -- but it's not exactly innovative today. Yet the guitarist brazenly asserts -- perhaps oblivious to the incongruency of the sentiment -- that unless the blues advances stylistically, its days are numbered.

Westword: You were only four, but you started playing guitar when bands like Van Halen dominated the airwaves. Why play the blues?

Joe Bonamassa: I never really liked pop music. I actually started playing classical until I was eight. I was always that little fat white kid who could play classical guitar. Then the blues just hit me. It was just one of those things where I just couldn't live without it.

Now you're part of the new generation of bluesmen, like Jonny Lang and Kenny Wayne Shepherd. There aren't many others, though. Is the blues a dying art?

I get in trouble for this point more than anything in my entire existence, but I will say that the blues, if it stays with the status quo, and the people doing the same old thing are rewarded over and over, that ultimately it will die off. I used to say it will be gone in twenty years, but if something is not done with the younger generation very, very soon, it's gone in five to ten years.

Sounds like a grim assessment.

There are traditional blues guys, and guys like me that the purists call "wankers." People go to concerts to be entertained. If people are not going to the more traditional blues shows, then people are not being entertained. If you've heard one blues guy, then you've heard them all; that's the problem. What pains me the most is that there are people doing something different, but the older guys don't trust the younger guys. They're writing their own check, and it's about to bounce.

Where does that leave you?

I've carved out my niche. I've been able to increase my audience, as opposed to a decrease for traditional blues artists. But the records that I make are not completely blues; they're blues-oriented. My heroes are the guys whose heroes were Muddy Waters and Robert Johnson. I like the sophistication of the English blues more. It's more exciting, and that's why I gravitated to that. I love Robert Johnson as much as anyone, but I cannot sit through fifteen songs -- it gets a little boring. I say that and people think I'm, like, the Seventh Sign of the Apocalypse. But I'd rather hear Clapton play "Crossroads" than Robert Johnson any day.