Receive Weekly Email and Text Message Updates:
Sign up for latest info on concerts, dining, promotions and more!
Go!

National Features >

  • City Pages

    Michele Bachmann, Unmuzzled

    You don't need to read Sarah Palin's book to hear the ravings of a mad woman.

    By Matt Snyders

  • Miami New Times

    Pimp Daddy

    The rise and fall of a chubby sex-cult leader.

    By Natalie O'Neill

  • Riverfront Times

    Babe 'n' Arms

    Tom was a hot-tempered cross-dresser with a garage full of guns--and then he became Rachel.

    By Nicholas Phillips

  • Dallas Observer

    The Fight for Texas

    Rick Perry and Kay Bailey Hutchison are locked in a battle over the soul of the GOP. They're also running for governor.

    By Sam Merten

The Simpsons Movie

Breathe easy, Simpsons fans: It doesn’t suck.

Share

  • rss

By Frank Houston

Published on July 24, 2007 at 9:05pm

The less said about the plot of the long-fabled, finally-arrived Simpsons Movie, the better; I know this instinctively, as a member of that particular segment of geekdom most psyched and apprehensive about its unveiling. I'm talking about the people who ask, "Does it suck?," then prayerfully add, "Please don't suck." You all deserve to experience the surprise — and to answer the question — for yourselves.

You'll know in the first ten minutes — or maybe as soon as the familiar Fox trumpet flourish sounds. We meet the yellow, manic, elastic residents of Springfield (which is where?) right in their midst, and they never let us out. I'll let the story unfold for itself, but just a few innocuous words: The lure of the doughnut serves as a key plot device; we get the most epic Itchy & Scratchy Show ever; and when President Schwarzenegger says, "I miss Danny DeVito," you'll know why.

The screenplay is credited to eleven writers, including Matt Groening, James L. Brooks, Al Jean and Mike Scully, though there's no sign of Sam Simon anywhere in the credits. Suffice it to say that Homer Simpson has imperiled the existence of his storied home town, and only Homer Simpson can save it. It's not giving anything away to say that Homer plays the fool to Marge's pragmatist, Bart has father issues, Lisa has a crush, and Maggie continues to represent all that is pure and wise.

Reports from early test screenings indicated the film was strong in its first two-thirds and softened in the last section. Only those lucky test screeners will know what, if anything, has changed since then. It is true that the rapid-fire sight gags predominate in the first half or so, but all the trademarks of the show, including the references, self-references and meta-references, ride shotgun throughout the movie's 89 minutes. The filmmakers take aim at the scale and sweep of the Big Summer Movie. But like the show, The Simpsons Movie is strictly whimsical and irreverently moral. Every time it toys with treacle or approaches self-importance, it promptly undermines itself with ruthless efficiency.

According to The Simpsons' extensive — no, exhaustiveWikipedia entry, President George H. W. Bush once promised "to strengthen the American family to make them more like The Waltons and less like The Simpsons." Thankfully that didn't happen. Say what you will about Rupert Murdoch trampling on the Wall Street Journal's editorial independence; at least the NewsCorp baron gave Jim Brooks a contract that forbade Fox from interfering with the show's content. Even after 400 episodes, we still enjoy our Fox gags (in The Simpsons Movie, the obligatory digs come early).

What works about The Simpsons on screen is what always has worked about the show: Despite the fact that we're sitting in a movie theater, we still feel like they're in our house. They are us. The only show with more longevity is Gunsmoke, but unlike Dodge City, Springfield is nowhere, precisely because it's everywhere.