Top

news

Stories

 

Letters to the Editor

Letters from the week of 6/19/2008

"Star Wars," Jason Sheehan, June 5

UF Uh-Oh

Jason Sheehan is one who wants to believe, and I remember how disappointed my nine-year-old was when she learned the truth about Santa. The flaws inherent to the, ahem, reasoning that goes into the modern religion of UFOlogy are more obvious today than ever before. To those not blinded by their faith in LGMs (Little Gray Men), anyway.

Before the worldwide commercial availability of small, inexpensive imaging devices such as tiny still and video cameras now available even in the ubiquitous cell phone, earth's skies were awash in UFO traffic. Curiously, the space-alien tourist trade dried up just when this new imaging technology became widely available. Coincidence? Conspiracy? Probably some of both. Indeed, True Believers have come up with a bewildering assortment of new, complex conspiracy theories to explain why even though half the world's population now carries some sort of camera everywhere they go, so few new, convincing, first-, second- or third-encounter photos are showing up. Fortunately, every once in a while, they entertain us with laughable fakery such as the "peeking Gray" being peddled by huckster Stan Romanek, images that look as if they were produced by a couple of pubescent pranksters who got hold of Dad's Bell & Howell Super-8, circa 1967. Still, it's proof enough that We Are Not Alone for credulous rubes such as Jeff Peckman, who have more money in their trust funds than brains in their skulls.

And that's all good fun until a sap like Peckman manages to get public money spent on his religion. Curiously, a few years ago, when President Bush suggested that religious organizations might more efficiently manage some public-welfare funds, the ACLU and other rabidly anti-religious "public interest" groups landed on the idea like a fleet of flying saucers on final approach to Roswell. I guess some religions are more equal than others.
JM Schell
Arvada


"State of Emergency," Jared Jacang Maher, June 5

When Minutes Matter

I was a paramedic trainee in the '80s and had to run calls with Denver Health paramedics. We never called them "The God Squad" — we saw them all as self-absorbed egotists whose medicine consisted of abuse, both physical and mental. We learned more about "what not to do" than what to do with their medicine. If we had treated patients like they did when we got back to our home services, we would have been fired. It wasn't until recently that the Colorado health department had the ability to investigate complaints. But the CDPHE has oversight only over the certification of EMTs and trauma centers. So if it is a service-delivery issue, the CDPHE has no oversight. Even the ambulance-licensure process is done by a county. Fox-watching-the-henhouse mentality.
Name withheld on request

A couple of years ago, in the middle of the night, I experienced a severe internal hemorrhage, complete with projectile vomiting of blood. I knew I was in very deep trouble. At the time, I only lived a half-mile from the emergency room — but I knew from experience with other friends and relatives that the ambulance would take far too long. I grabbed my keys and drove myself to the emergency room.

At that time, I worked closely with the medical community and knew that ambulances were few and sometimes not available. I had to risk my life and that of others in order to get to adequate health care as soon as possible. I was later told that had I been three to five minutes later, there would have been nothing they could do to save me — I had lost too much blood. Waiting for an ambulance or paramedics (if there were any available) would have been a death sentence.

While they did manage to save me (and the staff was heroic in all that they did), it did add insult to injury that my hospital wristband had my name in very small print at the bottom — but at the top, in large, bold print, were the words "Uninsured — Self-Pay." How sad that this information was more important than my name or health problem.
Name withheld on request

 
  • name witheld by request 09/12/2009 9:49:00 PM

    I wish someone would review Denver Health Paramedics again, and then maybe insurance company owned hospitals. For all the past news stories, it seems to me they (Denver Health Paramedics) still play god. As a private tax paying citizen with a pre-existing manageable condition, I never thought about needing to know rights to not be hauled off to an ER. But I recently found out I do when I was. All I knew to do then was state/request could I not be taken to the ER. I was told I couldn't not be taken and had to be looked at. I was more stunned and overwhelmed by all the attention and the paramedics than by the actual expression of the condition having caused the attention, which I'd recovered from by that time. I was taken by DHP and escorted/deposited at the ER and in the end, the ER did and could have done nothing, which I knew and which was why I didn't want to be taken. What I didn't know, since I'd never been hauled in before, was that Denver Health Paramedics gets to try and bill me now. Their billing dept simply says that, well, you (I) didn't sign a waiver of liability, and without that, you (I) am responsible for any charges. And yet, no address by the billing person is given as to why I wasn't presented the option on my verbally expressing my preference to not be transported. It's simply re-stated that there's no signed waiver so I'm now responsible and may write letters of dispute to be reviewed over the next month for possible address - but still again, no answer to the "why wasn't I made aware of the waiver" question. I'm also now going through the same with the ER hospital and the ER doctor, both I'm told reserve the right to bill me for "treatment" even if "treatment" was no more than verification of no treatment being needed. I am repeatedly pointed back to Denver Health Paramedics though in so far as the hospital says once a medic delivers someone, they must "treat" them (ie, collect billing address and GP data to create a file to charge you (me) for). The answer from the hospital to my question about rights not to be brought in/treated, while I was in the ER, was simply "don't know anything about that". This has become a giant, never-ending circle-talk mess, the only single common thread always seeming to lead back to the paramedics decision to override my wishes and not offer the waiver to begin with. As far as billing and collection of fees goes, any moral/business ethics or personal individual rights seem considered to be beside the point. I remember part of an oath being "First do no harm". It seems to have been rewritten for DHP and corp/insurance company owned hospitals to read "First bill for anything any way you can, and if possible, then do no harm".

 
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy