Last week, the Colorado Historical Society announced that Steven Turner will become the director of the State Historical Fund. That means that Turner is resigning as the director of Historic Denver. The promotion is good news for those of us who appreciate the old buildings of Denver. Not because Turner will be doling out millions for historic preservation, but rather because Historic Denver will be rid of someone who was an incredibly ineffective leader.
During his two years at HD's helm, Turner did a number of contemptible things, and he'll definitely be a better fit as a bureaucrat than as an advocate for historic preservation.
One example concerns the proposed redevelopment of the University of Colorado's Health Sciences Center at Colorado Boulevard at Ninth Avenue, which is being vacated as the school decamps for Fitzsimons. Turner signed off on plans that call for the demolition of the Victor Hornbein psychiatric complex on Eighth Avenue, a masterful pair of red-brick Usonian-style buildings. Hornbein, best known for the Denver Botanic Gardens, specialized in residences, and his buildings on the medical-center campus are rare examples of his talent applied to major structures. Maybe Turner's successor at Historic Denver will take developer Shea Properties back to the drawing board on this one.
Another example is the way Turner rolled over on plans to plop a Colorado History Museum in the middle of the Civic Center, making no objection to this stupid idea, which would have destroyed the integrity of this jewel. With the museum now set to build elsewhere, it seems like Turner degraded Historic Denver for no reason at all.
I'll close with a personal story: Last year, I worked on one of HD's guide books, and, in a conversation with Turner, he informed me that the publications were not about preservation. Gee, I wonder what he thought they were supposed to be about. By the way, I was brought on to that project by Kathleen Brooker, Turner's predecessor. I doubt Turner would have wanted someone like me involved, since I think historic architecture should be cherished.
*indicates required fields. Please enable browser cookies before filling out this form. All reader comments are subject to our Terms of Use. By clicking Add Comment, you acknowledge that you have reviewed and agree to these Terms.
Comments may take a few minutes to process and appear on the site. Please do not click the "Add Comment" button again while your comment is being added.
John B Woodward III 10/26/2008 11:19:29 AM
In the good old days of historic preservation, preservation was done by committed preservationists. Idealists often for sure, but their developer adversaries would always provide any needed ‘balance’ in the equation. Back then you didn’t have to ‘follow the money’, the preservationists never had any, the developers had it all, but everyone knew that’s how it worked. There would be victories (rare for preservationists) and losses on each side, but there always was a tiny thread of balance: civic mindedness and a strong feeling of right and wrong on one side, and all the money on the other. Looks like that era is over. Michael, thank-you for pointing this all out, but one statement needs a bit of an update: the henhouses are all but gone now, they’ve been scraped…