By Joel Warner
By Michael Roberts
By Alan Prendergast
By Michael Roberts
By Michael Roberts
By Amber Taufen
By Patricia Calhoun
By William Breathes
Every year, I wait for the Best of Denver, which I read cover to cover and then keep until the next year. And every year, I also wait for the letters the week after the Best of Denver, to see what people are going to complain about this time.
I read the letter from Three First Names Bergman last week, and I vehemently disagree. I love the cow! Keep the cow! Seeing how you use the mascot each year is one of the best things about the Best of Denver.
Yes, Park Burger has the Best Fries! I don't know the spot that John Johnson was talking about in his letter last week, but I'm willing to bet that no Lone Tree restaurant has fries as good as those at Park Burger. In fact, I'm willing to bet that no Lone Tree restaurant has fries as good as those at McDonald's — the readers' choice.
Put up or shut up, Johnson.
We are the proud recipients of a Best Of award from back in 1994. We bear that honor publicly and proudly (we can't elaborate, as this letter will most likely affect our chances in the Best of Denver 2011). But we are a bit disgruntled with the way you presented this year's entries and the lack of special instructions in which to fulfill our submissions.... We honestly thought that our submission to you, already having the distinction of the 1994 Best Of award, would have been welcomed as "award" worthy in that particular category, especially with all the new advancements that we have made. But where's the category? It's not there this year. A door that didn't open. It's YOUR category; we merely focused our submissions based on that particular category. How about a vote for inconsistency? Our observation is this: Although the first 100 or so questions on the Readers' Poll are legitimate, The Best...It's Up to You category is smelling more like a stink hole created to suck unsuspecting readers in to participate in your silly survey.
The Best Of issue is a great concept, but it should be implemented with all of your readers' best interests in mind, not just Westword's. After all, you're asking US to give our time to participate; we think YOU should, too. You have the whole following year in which to exploit your interests, and us? We have a whole year to try to figure Westword's mandatory info needed in order to give our next year's submission credibility in a category already created by YOU and previously won by US. Please be specific about what's really "up to you" in the Readers' Poll.... Please address this issue publicly in an upcoming Westword for all us Best Of veterans and Best Of new-timers. I'm sure we're not the only Westword readers deceived by this. We'd all like to share in the same opportunity for recognition. Denver's our home...we're all in this together. Show us that more than just insiders can play, too.
Editor's note: There's more, lots more, to the letter from the Best of Denver 1994 winner, but the concerns basically boil down to two questions. First, if a category appears one year, why doesn't it repeat? Short answer: The Best of Denver would become very, very repetitive if we always featured the same categories; although we repeat some, we rotate out many more. And second, do we actually pay attention to the Best...It's Up to You category on the Readers' Poll? Yes, we do — at least a dozen of the awards we gave this year grew out of suggestions on the Readers' Poll — and many more of those suggestions may appear in next year's issue, after we do more research. The Best of Denver is not a popular election. If it were, we'd all be reading a lot more about McDonald's french fries.
Michael Paglia's closing comments that vinyl discs are obsolete and nothing more than trash hit a nerve. Albums certainly hit bottom for a while, but if you want evidence of the medium's resurgence, go to Twist & Shout and check out the racks of new vinyl. As an added bonus, one could spend as productive an afternoon viewing the cover artwork as making the rounds of Denver's finest museums and galleries.
For Christ's sake, will you guys find a decent, starving restaurant critic already? Enough of the Rockies-esque rotation.
I'm fed (no pun intended) up with flowery essays regarding "invite-only" tasting dinners, critiques of restaurants only catering to people who wipe their asses with Ben Franklin's face, and pseudo-authors already too full of themselves to give an objective review on where to get a decent meal.
Really? A whole column dedicated to cheese? If I wanted to read that crap, I'd subscribe to "GQ" — Gruyère Quarterly.
Hooray for the Best of Denver issue! Now I know where the other 99 percent of Colorado really eats.