-
a grown up 01/30/2011 6:27:00 AM
I think the employees at Barolo have better things to do than post on here. I have eaten at Barolo a number of times and have never had a bad meal. I have also eaten at some top restaurants in Denver and had some pretty bad meals. It happens.
Everyone is entitled to an opinion, and it's just that, an opinion. Also keep in mind that what one person thinks is good might not be the same for someone else. I feel bad for people that live their lives based off of a review. I have read poor reviews for certain movies and music and they were completely off base from what I felt. It's like being in high school all over again. So live your life and figure things out on your own.
-
01/14/2011 11:09:00 PM
Great review - I can't help but wonder if a lot of the people in the comments aren't employees of Barolo....
-
Maya 12/22/2010 11:30:00 PM
Well leah, I suppose if she had any substantial credentials to be a food critic she would've listed them by now...seeing as how she's into making "lists" ;). I just hope for her sake that when she grows up she will find her true passion. A good reporter is someone who is unbiased and cares about the community, patrons and vendors alike. So while she may have had a bad experience at this restaurant, it makes you wonder why the huge smear campaign? beware to any man that dates this woman, if you reject her, she'll tell everyone what a small _____ you've got!
-
Leahst888 12/22/2010 10:43:00 PM
Dear Laura,
Like you, I love food, have traveled the world and have been fortunate enough to be able to dine at the hottest and most well-respected restaurants in the U.S. and other countries. I'm wondering why I couldn't be a food critic myself and what sets you apart from a regular person like me... I think it would be helpful to your readers to know this information, then people could feel they trusted you. thanks!
-
MountainLyin 12/22/2010 4:51:00 PM
I can certainly think of three dozen reasons why I mourn Jason Sheehan's departure to Seattle.
-
Berndtunkl 12/22/2010 6:12:00 AM
didn't know barolo had that many employees to comment on the review....
-
Mike 12/22/2010 2:25:00 AM
Nice work detective, maybe we should be the food critics.
-
brulee 12/21/2010 5:10:00 AM
Mike: good eye on the iron. I thought the same thing. I highly doubt the photos from the slide show are not available to be referenced while writing the food review. Beyond the hatchet job of a review based on feelings of not having gotten the 'Frank Bruni treatment' (the car parker was not a royal valet and a VIP table did not get released to accommodate a person without a reservation and the wine bottle carrier was not a sommelier) and the low blow of putting out a list of 36 places to go to instead, one must question a food critics knowledge when they call out a "limp and sticky" creme brulee crust for tasting like mystery propane when perhaps instead they should be asking if the barely blond crust was brulee'ed enough to get to a hard crack or why there is dusted powdered sugar to suck moisture onto the crust or why there is a pool of sauce on crust (all as shown on image 6 of 18)?
-
Mike 12/20/2010 11:40:00 PM
I don't get it, if they brulee their custard with an iron, how would it taste of propane? Reference the slide show, that's not a propane torch, it's an iron that you heat on the stove or broiler. They really do make a nice crust. Plus, propane cooks off upon ignition, creating a flame when mixed with oxygen. Spent propane is odorless. Was that just for show? If they cook their custard in an aluminum pot you might be tasting something metallic/alkaline, or you just might not have any taste. In food, at least, it's obvious you don't have any taste in writing. Way to be.
-
lala 12/20/2010 6:36:00 PM
I had horrible service years ago (during its prime) and have never returned. My parents are not the type of people to dress up, so I guess the waiter assumed we were low rent hicks that would not know how to order, much less tip. he was rude and condescending; that is when he deigned to even come back to the table. It was one of the most awful dining experiences I have ever had.
-
jack 12/20/2010 7:57:00 AM
Wow...my comment was erased. Truth hurts I suppose.
-
Jack Hamlin 12/20/2010 7:50:00 AM
This is the first time I have ever written a comment to a food review, but I am truly tired of Laura Shunk's poor writing style. She sucks at her job, and I will not read another food review with her name under it.
While I agree with some of the content in her most recent article [Star Struck], she comes off as the arrogant one, not the waiter.
"If I ordered the bottle, I'm tasting." says Shunk. Speaking of arrogant...OK, a whole bottle of wine for one person for dinner doesn't sound excessive, Femi-Nazi Wino.
-
Mike 12/19/2010 10:08:00 PM
The overall message here in the article, I totally agree with. This restaurant is where the old money in Cherry Creek goes and that's fine. And yes the star duck dish does SUCK! Why is this restaurant still in business, well, the masses are asses.......
-
CL 12/19/2010 3:46:00 AM
Ms. Shunk answered the question of why she printed the unpopular and immoral list of 'restaurants to eat at other than the one I just bashed' (as if drilling Barolo weren't enough - even if justified). It sounds like her answer is because that's what she felt in her heart. I feel things in my heart all the time that I don't say out loud because it's either just not done or it would be horribly cruel to say. Sometimes my date has 1 glass of wine too many at dinner and it's annoying. When my date orders more wine, I don't stop the waiter and say 'do you have a list of alternatives that my date can have other than wine'. My date would be mortified and there are better ways to discus what I feel and also better times to talk about it. My boss often has bad breathe and I feel like telling him. But I don't. I wish his wife would, but it's not my place to say. Certain things should be handled certain ways and I can't find one person (other than Ms. shunk's boss who authorized the list to be printed) that thinks the list should have been added to the bottom of a review that had already articulated the issues Ms. Shunk had with her meal and experience. It was wrong, unprofessional and cruel. I know that some of the restaurant owners on that list didn't want to be on it. (All press isn't good press.) But she at least shared with us why she published the list, even if her logic doesn't hold up to scrutiny. Further, the idea that she produced the list before Denver began 'demanding' she put her money where her mouth is and prove that she truly 'did' have a list, is absurd. I'm not trying to be cheeky when I say that a monkey with a telephone directory could have produced that list.... Or even worse, a fool with a computer and access to Yelp.
I enjoy Ms. Shunk's writing thus far in her career. I should be clear about that. I just think she had a massive lapse in judgement by putting out that list. It's our job as those that read and love Westword to finger Ms. Shunk on this. She has stated that she will not apologize and that's sad. I'll still read her, but I won't 'listen' to her opinion on restaurants any longer. She's lost credibility.
-
Laura Shunk 12/18/2010 10:48:00 PM
Once again, thanks for the feedback.
Jay- I don't hate Denver. I actually love Denver. I'm excited to be in Denver. That's why I came back here in the first place. But I also don't think I have to accept any trade-off with restaurants. This isn't a cowtown anymore, and like I said, there's never been a better time to dine in this city. A lot of places really do it right.
DenverScener- thanks for checking out my old self-indulgent, highly ridiculous blog. Feeds the ego. Which, you can imagine, is really what makes this trainwreck run.
As for the list, I not going to defend or apologize for it, but I will tell you why we ran it: my honest sentiment at the end of each meal I had at Barolo was that I was bummed about dropping such a hefty sum for dinner because I simply get more bang for my buck at many other Denver establishments. Three dozen other establishments, I wrote in my review. And if I make a claim like that, I have to be certain I can back it up. So I made the list. And then instead of waiting for commenters to challenge me to name the three dozen restaurants I'd rather eat at, we printed it.
-
Linda 12/18/2010 8:29:00 PM
Seriously now, Ms. Shunk comes off as a spoiled, angry, pompous ass, perhaps because she short-changed her own aspirations and settled for something less than what she really wanted. Too bad for her. This was not a professionally written review, it was an uppity personal opinion unworthy of consideration. I have dined at Barolo Grill, found a whole new world in flavor experience and was impressed with both the food and the wait staff. Perhaps if Ms. Shunk were less self important she would do herself a favor. For one, who wouldn't think of making a reservation on a Saturday night? Duhh! Sounds like you went in with an attitude. Perhaps your Mother was accepted graciously because she wasn't expecting the wait staff to kiss her ass! Reconsider your attitude, your choice of home city, or your career. Or, just stick to your 20-something hip hop joints.
-
Jay 12/18/2010 7:43:00 PM
I too moved here from a city with generally better restaurants than Denver and, more importantly, a much better customer service ethic among the city's wait staff. I accept that as one of the trade-offs to living here. My career doesn't revolve around food or restaurants, as does a food critic's, but if it did and I hated Denver as much as that critic, I would MOVE rather than pout, wallow in a faux-fashion pretense, and parade my 'cowtown' upbringing. The review was real 'bush-league' work and reflected as badly on Westword as it did on the reviewer.
I have career advice for the reviewer: Move, Ms. Shunk, please, and take your holier-than-thou horse manure with you to a city where you will be a minnow in a mudhole instead of a poodle on Park Avenue.
PS: I don't work at Barolo, I have eaten there once, and liked it. I was treated very well by their wait staff, better than most restaurants here in fact. They were upbeat and friendly.
-
Dave 12/18/2010 5:10:00 PM
I agree with the review. Barolo is over priced for what you get. And, the service is full of attitude. There are so many better places to eat... Luca, Fruition, Osteria Marco...
-
DenverScener 12/18/2010 9:46:00 AM
Just read Skunky's blog, WOW - talk about baggage issues, high maintenance no doubt! Poor Girl or guy that goes home to her! She actually wrote Harvard blasting them about law school. Trainwreck, steer clear!
-
DenverScener 12/18/2010 9:36:00 AM
I think Laura Skunk (sic) did not make it out on the "fashionable coasts" for numerous reasons but probably because she is a spoiled brat who believes that everything should be delivered on a silver platter. You work for WW honey - Get Over Yourself.
-
Waiting 12/18/2010 4:26:00 AM
Isn't it time for the critic to apologize for or defend her list of 24 restaurants she would rather eat at over Barolo? It's what more people are talking about than her review. Her review was fine and not many bloggers are attaccking her for it. The 'list' is what has people worked up.
For the record, I think it's abominable. I've lived all over the country eating at the best restaurants this country has to offer. During that time ive followed many writers. Not once have I seen such a petty, tacky, mean spirited list put together. If she can defend it, she should get to it. This will define your food critic career from here on out. I would suggest not defending it just because you are being pushed in a corner. There is no harm in saying you screwed up. But if you think it's justified, we need to know why and we want to know soon. We want to know what moral maxims you adhere to that are somehow alluding 100% of the bloggers writing about this topic.
-
leah 12/18/2010 3:43:00 AM
I can appreciate Shunk’s attempt to give us an honest and entertaining review, but as I read her story, it was difficult to ignore her obvious, personal desire for respect and self-validation during her experience at Barolo. Her dramatic critique of the staff and food is annoying at best, and makes me wonder if she isn’t getting the kind of respect and attention that the Westword’s newest food critic may be yearning for. I’ve frequented 15 out of the 20 restaurants she has listed as alternatives to Barolo and will say that while they are all outstanding restaurants (some of them among my favorites), each place has things I love and some that I just don’t. I can guarantee that none of these establishments are in the business to “rip-off” their patrons, what they provide is art and an experience that comes from a passion for food. Since my first dining experience at Barolo, it’s been difficult for me to find another that compares. I’ve returned there 5 times and have yet to be disappointed. It’s hard to imagine that anything “wretched” could make its way out of that kitchen. Like any foodie, I’m constantly searching for the next meal that will take me to the edge of culinary bliss and won’t be looking to Shunk’s gratuitous and borderline, juvenile commentary to help me decide.
-
Bill 12/17/2010 8:18:00 PM
Laura, you are lucky to have the disposable income and or Westword expense account to make $200 restaurant 'mistakes.' Value is a funny thing to measure. Just remember that some of us don't have as deep of pockets and its possible to feel "utterly ripped off" regardless of how many zeroes are behind the final bill.
-
Cl 12/17/2010 5:42:00 PM
This is more thoughts on Ms? Shunk's list of better restaurants than Barolo:
The list could have easily been published as '2 dozen restaurants I really like', not posted as 'don't eat at Barolo any evening when these 2 dozen restaurants are open'.
Ms. shunk has shanked her reputation quickly. It was either an immature decision or an attempt to create buzz around a food critic that hasn't received much buzz since taking over for the ever popular and often controversial Sheehan. Her job is tough trying to make a name for herself but her actions were classless. Her list of restaurants is on the same level of marketing as Twin Peaks bikini coffee service shack. There are just some self promotion events that are unavailable to professionals with morals.
Ms. Shunk should apologize for this as something she didn't think all the way through or embrace the dirty nature of what she has done. I hope the former gets considerable thought from her. The ends don't justify the means unless you're Gordon Geicko or Dick Cheney.
-
Kevin 12/17/2010 5:19:00 PM
I wouldn't normally defend this writer. I miss Jason Sheehan too much, and like a scorned lover, the replacement will never quite match up. My strange neuroses aside, I'm sure she's a lovely person and has a palate that outmatches mine.
I feel like I have to step in and defend her here. Thanks to the Internet, you can't write a poor review of a restaurant without the staff of that restaurant rushing to discredit and personally attack the reviewer. Whether that's because the staff wants to keep their jobs, or they honestly are the true believers we'll never know.
I can't defend the decision to run a list of 24 restaurants that are better than Barolo Grill. That seems petty. But what I can defend is a (seemingly) well-intentioned review that isn't glowing.
Cry all you want about your restaurant's poor review - I'm sure it's a fine place to work or frequent. In a city where the daily newspaper struggles to find space for a decent restaurant review once a month, reviews like these - that try to tell the honest-to-God truth - are few and far between.
-
Laura Shunk 12/17/2010 7:48:00 AM
Thanks for the feedback, everyone, and keep it coming -- I really appreciate the comments.
Just wanted to say, Andi, that yes, I have been to northern Italy (Piedmont, in fact), and I am very aware of makes up the cuisine there. But I'm not sure it matters, because whether Barolo is or is not an authentically northern Italian restaurant wasn't really my concern in this review.
-
Andi 12/17/2010 1:56:00 AM
Are you kidding?? Barolo is one of Denver’s best! Do not let this poorly written, inaccurate, and tacky article deter you from going. What are Laura’s credentials in reviewing restaurants and food? Has she ever been to Northern Italy? Is she aware of the cuisine there? Most food critics are educated and knowledgeable on all types of food and cuisines. Barolo is classic and elegant! The food is beautiful, delicious, and authentic as many patrons can attest to. Barolo consistently maintains the highest standards in food, wine, and staff. You get nothing but the best from Barolo!
-
Leonardo Bortolotto 12/17/2010 12:31:00 AM
This review is unwarranted. The Barolo Grill has been a successful restaurant on the Denver scene for 2 decades, consistently delivering authentic Northern Italian cuisine, not trendy Asian-fusion-locally-sourced-whatever. The entire staff is highly skilled, the restaurant travels to Italy annually, and the standards are nothing but impeccable. I am disappointed this reviewer did not have the experience they were looking for, but Barolo Grill consistently delivers. Just ask the regulars who dine there weekly.
-
Classless 12/17/2010 12:01:00 AM
Jennifer - in the printed edition of Westword there is a list of restaurants she recommends more than Barolo.
Laura's comments about the decor and Barolo's established reputation for 'over-selling' wine are difficult to debate - although not that big of a deal either. But no matter how you slice it, Brian Laird's food is still spot on. Please, Denver readers, don't confuse Barolo with some of the other old giants that lost quality and died, like Mel's Bistro. This isn't the case. Blair Taylor has the same professional staff today that he did 15 years ago (and I do mean the exact same staff). They still go to Italy once a year to hone their craft and bring it back to Denver. Does ANYBODY have that kind of commitment to their restaurant in this city? If they do, it's a well kept secret.
Don't write this restaurant off. It's still a gem. It just needs a little polishing.
-
Jennifer 12/16/2010 10:19:00 PM
Classless - what are you talking about - what list of competitors? I don't see any list.
Thanks to Laura for the heads up. Barolo has been on my list for awhile of places to try, and now it will come off. She just saved me a lot of money and frustration.
-
memesometimes 12/16/2010 9:47:00 PM
Barolo patrons are mostly AARP members. The food is mediocre. I too had a soup there that was terrible. The roasted duck was hidden in sauce and the veg looked like it came from the supermarket frozen aisle. As long as there are old,rich people in Cherry Creek this place will survive.
-
Dee 12/16/2010 9:14:00 PM
I agree with the review; we are transplants to Denver, and we heard such good things about Barolo and its legacy--but what we received was very disappointing. And I think the reason it was so much so is that we held it up to comparably priced food elsewhere and it didn't measure up. So I think it is necessary to qualify that review with other restaurants in which you would rather spend your money, especially given that the focus of the review, at least as evidenced by title, was that Barolo used to be such a top-notch place, really one of the first here in Denver, but for whatever reason, they have rested too long on those laurels...and those restaurants who came up because a place like Barolo was so successful, are outshining it now...
-
Kendra 12/16/2010 8:13:00 PM
The review is spot on. Barolo is stale and the staff is snobby. If you don't order a bottle of wine, they frown upon you.
-
Classless 12/16/2010 5:49:00 AM
While a good writer, Laura is showing signs of trouble here. It is very tacky to create a list of restaurants one likes better than the one being reviewed at the bottom of the page. Write the review and let the topic restaurant take their licks if they deserve a spankig, but don't create a list of better competitors in the same article. Save it for another story.