Top

news

Stories

 

And that moment left its legacy. "We have this amazing transformative convention here in Denver," Burnap says, "and of all the work we did, bikes seemed to be the thing that really shifted the way people imagined the city." After the convention, Hickenlooper told the group that had worked on the DNC bike program that he wanted 1,000 bikes in Denver as part of a permanent bike-share program by the following spring.

It was an ambitious goal, but one that sent a strong message: Denver would be a trailblazing city for cyclists.

On April 22, 2010 — Earth Day — B-cycle officially launched; by the end of that year, the program had 500 bikes spread across fifty stations around town, making Denver the first city in the country with a citywide bike-sharing program. (Washington, D.C., had already tried a small, ten-station pilot.) Today, B-cycle has 53 stations around the city and nearly 3,000 annual users who pay $80 for a yearly pass; there are also around 40,000 casual users who can pay $8 for a 24-hour pass. And B-cycle will add another thirty stations by next spring, Burnap says.

But bike sharing is just one piece of the puzzle in Denver's rapid transformation into a more bike-friendly city. Even as B-cycle got under way, the city was shifting the focus of its overall transportation planning to include bicycles, hiring a planner primarily dedicated to bike infrastructure. This move, combined with the growing strength of BikeDenver, a bike-advocacy group, has catalyzed the overall expansion of cycling in the city.

Denver, says Hickenlooper, is "poised to become just the international magnet for biking...it gets people healthier. It gets cars off the highway, and in many ways, it allows you to experience your community."

*****

On a late Tuesday afternoon, John Hayden and Jonny Rotheram are perched on their bikes at the corner of 16th Avenue and Broadway, watching cars and bikes go through the busy intersection. They grimace as buses and large cars make sharp left turns from Broadway onto 16th, driving right over the painted image of a cyclist facing the opposite direction — a symbol that designates this as a street where cyclists are encouraged to ride.

They watch as a young woman with a guitar on her back rides her bike across Broadway toward the 16th Street Mall, narrowly missing two RTD buses going in opposite directions.

"This whole area needs to be redesigned," says Hayden, the chair of the Mayor's Bicycle Advisory Committee, a volunteer advocacy group.

"Have a prioritized cycling crossing," suggests Rotheram, a bike planner from the United Kingdom who's now a transportation consultant here.

"16th Avenue — this is a primary street for bikes," adds Hayden.

"Bikes should be given priority here to get across this road and get to downtown. And then downtown should be cyclist-friendly," Rotheram says.

Rotheram and Hayden are cycling together around the city to study its current bike infrastructure. As the head of the MBAC, Hayden works with the city on a wide range of issues affecting cyclists, including infrastructure. On their ninety-minute ride through downtown and beyond, the two note all sorts of flaws in Denver's current system, from gaps in the network of streets and paths for cyclists to confusing or nonexistent signage to streets unnecessarily accommodating cars and parking to the detriment of cyclists.

"You have to plan for the whole city — it's not a little bit here, a little bit there," Rotheram says, explaining to Hayden the "cultural shift that cities have to go through" to make urban centers accessible and safe for cyclists with a linked network of streets. "It needs to be a whole strategy [with]...connections and access."

Over the past five years, the city has more than doubled bike infrastructure, from sixty miles of lanes and sharrows (bike markings indicating that cyclists have room to share the road) to 137 miles today. That comes out to about twenty miles of new pavement markings each year. In 2011, the city added two miles of sharrows and sixteen miles of bike lanes; the Denver Department of Public Works will have installed another eight miles of sharrows and seventeen miles of bike lanes by the end of the year.

The driving force behind this major push is Emily Snyder, who joined Public Works as senior city planner in 2009, with a specific focus on both bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure. For Snyder, the issue is personal. She got her master's degree in transportation planning, with a specific focus on bike planning, and she's a year-round cyclist — even when it snows. Most people she works with know her as "Emily, the bike girl," she says, adding that she owns only "half a car." She shares it with her boyfriend, and together they own a total of nine bikes.

She hates parking that car, and finds cycling much less stressful and much more rewarding than driving. "For me, it's fun," she says. "I enjoy being out. I'm an active person, and I like integrating that activity into my day. And I'm a city planner. I love the city. On my bike, I get to experience more of it."

« Previous Page
 |
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
All
 
Next Page »
 
My Voice Nation Help
51 comments
Spandino
Spandino

I miss my friend...Think about you everyday Danny

coloradobikelawyers
coloradobikelawyers

Unfortunately, this article only reinforces many of the biases that are held by many, if not most, motorists.  Of course there are a minority of bicyclists that feel the rules of the road to not apply to them.  However, most bicyclists understand the unique dangers that face them when riding on the road and take the appropriate precautions.  However, these types of accidents still occur no matter how safe you are riding your bike.  Our law firm represents many cyclists and their families that have been injured or killed while following the rules of the road.  These accidents are far to frequent and they destroy the lives of not only the cyclists but their loved ones as well.

 

If you are a cyclist and are not sure if or how the laws apply to you, feel free to check out our website. Quick food for thought:  you can receive a DUI on a bike C.R.S. Section 42-4-1301.

 

Please be safe out there!

joemiddleclass
joemiddleclass

I love biking but the issue I find is that too many bicyclists ignore the rules of the road, ride with headphones, ride at night without lights or improper lighting, ride under the influence, run lights or stop signs, ride the wrong way down one way streets. Denver is a great city for biking but for their own safety, like motorcyclists they are forced to be a bit more vigilant. I've been stopped for a burned out tail light but never seen a bicyclist stopped for riding at night without any lights. I have too many friends who think that using their bike for transportation to avoid a DUI is a great thing.

 

Responsible bicycling is as important as responsible driving. If police enforced rules of the road on bicyclists as fast as they do cars many problems might be solved. Sharing the road responsibly is important. Bicycles are great for health of people and the air we breathe and over crowding of cars but riders have to be as responsible as drivers if the sharing is going to work.

Bradley Langston
Bradley Langston

I am always frightened by the number of cyclists at night with no reflectors or lights.

annqueue
annqueue

Hi, my name's Ann. (shake hands.) I ride a bike. I'm just trying to get where I'm going. I don't run red lights unless the sensor's broken and the light won't turn green for me. I occasionally ride on downtown sidewalks - at walking speed - because I'm terrified of downtown rush hour traffic. When I do this most pedestrians aren't aware there's a bike behind them, because I'm not trying to pass them. If the sidewalk's crowded, I walk my bike. I don't want to hit anyone and never have, and would much rather ride in the street, but sometimes it's just too dangerous. I always wear a helmet and don't ride with headphones. One time, if I had had headphones on, I probably would have been t-boned and killed by a driver who motored straight through the red light at 45 mph. When I drive I'm very aware that I'm controlling a ton of steel capable of injuring or killing, and try to drive accordingly. I've never gotten so much as a speeding ticket.

 

Am I your enemy? Should I really be the target of such vitriol?

 

"We have plenty of bike paths - stay there."

But the places cyclists need to go aren't on bike paths. They need to go to the businesses and residences where everyone works and lives, and very few are on a bike path. At some point you have to use the street to get to your final destination.

 

"Rush hour is bad enough - don't clog it up further."

If we had dedicated cycling facilities, we wouldn't clog it up. We'd free up space by reducing the number of cars sharing your car lane. The majority of cyclists are also drivers, and when they're on their bikes they're not in cars in front of you. This also means the majority of cyclists DO pay gas taxes. Also bicycles cause orders of magnitude less damage than cars and heavier vehicles, and creating more space to move people by adding a bike lane is far cheaper than adding more car lanes. The problem is there's not a place where bikes *belong* at the moment. Create that - as the article talks about - and things get much, much easier for everyone.

 

Here's a website that might help explain some cyclist behavior that can be mystifying if you don't ride regularly. I wish this were part of standard driver's education.

http://cyclingsavvy.org/hows-my-driving/

 

druid06211
druid06211

The real problem is that bicyclists seem to think that they are sacred cows.  They are exercising, and therefore closer to the right hand of God.  Get a grip.  Be defensive.  Cars are bigger.  And use common sense as to where and when you ride.  We have plenty of bike paths - stay there.  Rush hour is bad enough - don't clog it up further.

Bobster
Bobster

There is ZERO enforcement of the scumbags who ride bikes on sidewalks.  The DPS is appartently only useful when it comes to beatdowns.

 

The mayor and police chief are dunces.

 

SxPxDxCx
SxPxDxCx

Every one of these anti bike posts seem to just blame the cyclist.  As if all motorist in this town are just driving around following all the traffic rules and it just the angry swarming cyclists that are breaking all the rules.  I don't disagree that cyclist sharing the road need to follow the rules but so do the motorist.

 

Daily I look out my window of my office and see cars that just don't bother to stop at the stop sign at the street corner.  Most drivers seem to not know what the big white stop line painted in front of cross walks means.  I see drivers all the times the just roll up into the cross walk to stop.  If they bother to come to a complete stop at all.

 

Here is a pop quiz for all you motorist?  When making a left hand turn onto a two lane road what lane are you always supposed to turn into?  No it's not what ever lane you feel like.  It's the left hand lane.  Conversely if you are making a right hand turn you need to pull into the closest lane on the right hand side of the road.  How often do you see motorist follow that rule?

 

Currently on 6th Ave and I-25 there are section of the road that are stripped with solid white lines and signage that says "No Passing Stay In Lane".  Almost every time I'm passing through one of those sections I see people ignore both the strips and the signs. 

 

My point bringing this up is there are lots of motorist in this town that are either ignorant of the traffic rules or just blatantly ignore them.  That isn't an excuse for cyclist behaving badly but no cyclist ever ran a red light or stop sign and killed the driver of a car.

 

 

 

 

 

cov87_1999
cov87_1999

I sometimes commute 18 miles to work and love the fact that I can do this on 17 miles of bike paths. Of course I choose to ride 17 miles on bike paths and if it was 17 miles on Denver's roads I may not enjoy bike commuting so much. I have biked to work in every city I have lived in including Portland  (great), San Diego (terrible), Coventry (good) and Sydney (not so good). Denver is good but there is a definite need for education for bike riders and car drivers. Both equally to blame in my opinion. But we have to continue to encourage people to bike; I think we are where Portland was in the mid 90's

patricia.calhoun
patricia.calhoun moderator editortopcommenter

we'd like to publish some of these comments in our print edition -- ideally with your full name. if that's okay, e-mail me at patricia.calhoun@westword.com.

propylene22
propylene22

Ass hat hipsters with no brakes riding down the middle of busy streets when there are bike lane streets a block away..

bugsycook
bugsycook

Owners of cars pay for registration once a year on their cars to help cover the cost of maintaining roads. If bicyclists expect to be able to take up the same space as a car on the road then they need to start paying yearly registration fees as well to help pay for the roads - otherwise, get the F outta my way!

bugsycook
bugsycook

Mr Peterson contributed to his own demise. He was riding the wrong way on a very busy street at 2am - he was probably drunk too -  and ran a red light to boot. Don't feel sorry for him at all. Bikes need to follow the same rules as cars and stay to the right hand side of the road - period, end of story - or become road pizza.

Wilson
Wilson

The wailing complaints of motorists that I always see on these blogs fall under two categories; inconvenience and jealousy. Inconvenienced because they have to slow down and pay attention. Jealous because bikes can break the law more easily (run a stop sign, ride on sidewalks, etc.) and get away with it. wah. Dan Peterson is dead. Before the accident he was breaking the law (riding the wrong way without lights) and paid more of a price than any ticket you will ever pay. Before the accident, his killer was breaking the law too, driving a stolen car. You probably have a choice...you're not breaking the law when you see a rider, but you can choose to then, and pay the price yourself. Bike riders don't bother me. I'm not in a hurry. I had one just miss the back of my car the other day (ran a stop sign). My passenger was outraged. I just shrugged it off, because I wasn't breaking the law, would've stopped and called the police if there was a collision, then sought compensation from the rider for all damages. (By the way, you are required by law to report a vehicle/bicycle collision). Calm down. And counter your jealousy with the belief that the rider you see today weaving in and out of traffic will pay for it someday, they all do. Or you can run them down or get into a fight and pay yourself. They're not going away. And you don't want to be the one paying for their stupidity. Calm down.

CO_Native
CO_Native

An article about bike safety with a picture of the chair of the Mayor's Bicycle Advisory Committee and a bike planner from the UK riding around Denver without helmets on - brilliant!  I am an avid bicyclist and this illustrates the problem perfectly, many bicyclists need to be educated (including the advocates apparently) on how and where to ride on the streets safely. Riding down one-way streets (13th and 14th specifically) that do not have bike lanes when there are streets with bike lanes only several blocks away (12th and 16th) does not make any sense. 

DangerDangerDanger
DangerDangerDanger

Perhaps we need some reform to traffic laws (treat a stop sign as a yield, stop light as stop sign, etc) and then people will be more likely to follow them.  

 

Cyclists should signal. Cars should also signal.

 

Some specific infrastructure changes could also make a big difference.  The bike map is great, but too few people use it.  The story pointed out one of my biggest pet peeves which is the piecemeal nature of our cycle infrastructure.  I go from bike lane to sidewalk to unmarked bike route to within about a quarter mile at one point on my commute.  It took close map reading and multiple passes on the bike before I was confident that I was doing it right; most cyclists can't or won't take that kind of time.

 

AgendaBuster
AgendaBuster

~~~

Wow, I agree with poster Mike!

 

These bicycles are never useing lights at night. How can anyone see them. I don't agree with not stopping! However, who sees these bicycles out at all hours of the night with no lights on?

 

The problem here is the Bike Riders are driving around stoned and drunk....... and so are the car drivers!!!

SamTLevin
SamTLevin

@mkmccalmont thanks! Almost nothing gets more crazy passionate comments than articles about biking...

bill
bill

what a total crock, please dont lump us pedestrians in with the cyclists. 

 

get the cyclists to follow the traffic laws, stay off the sidewalk, and be halfway aware of their surroundings, and the safety problem will solve itself.  

 

Currently they ride anywhere they can, think they own the road, the sidewalk and the bike trail. Pedestrians are nothing more than interference for them, most will purposely graze pedestrians who arent yielding the sidewalk, or get rude and offensive.

 

Then they bait drivers and tick them off too, Screw denver cyclists, they suck.

plpllawson
plpllawson

This new generation of bicyclists are annoying and dangerous. With their feeble lights they should not be on the streets at night. It's just plain ignorant.

 

And the last thing anyone wants to deal with when they are going up the mountains is having to deal with passing them. Most of us want to experience the serenity and beauty of the mountains, not a hundred goofy people on their bikes on one of those bike tours or what ever they call them

Harley101
Harley101

Now--a question:  How to instill safety with the morons who ride bikes--weaving in and out of traffic, maybe come up with a license--say $50 to ride the bikes, and another $100 or so for licenses FOR the bikes--hey, we can make a lot of money.   And of course, require liabilty insurance! 

kalamitykarla
kalamitykarla

Start handing out traffic tickets to those cyclist who, ride the wrong way on a one way,  ride their bikes on the sidewalks of downtown Denver and nearly run YOU down while you are walking.  Put police of bikes and start handing out tickets, once they have to start paying for their actions and attitude, maybe then there will be respect for Traffic Laws that apply to ALL vehicles YES a Bike is A VEHICLE!! 

jrodenver
jrodenver

 @druid06211

'There are plenty of bike paths - stay there' tell you what, go and get a map of bike routes, and then pretend your car is a bicycle that can only use those routes. Try to create your route to work using only those bike routes. I think you get the idea...

jrodenver
jrodenver

 @Bobster

 So we cycle on the road, we get motorists shouting at us to use the sidewalk, we cycle on the sidewalk, we get angry pedestrians.

UrbanSnowshoer
UrbanSnowshoer

 @SxPxDxCx I would agree with what you have said; however, I would also add one more grievance: cars (especially taxis) who think the bike lane is a parking space. 

Michael564
Michael564

 @propylene22 What a ridiculous statement. Akin to "Old-ass fogeys with bad attitudes, driving on bike-filled streets, when there is a perfectly good Interstate a few blocks away." Bikes belong on the same streets as cars -- that's the law. Drivers need to just grow up and accept that fact. BOTH need to follow the laws.

Justme
Justme

 @bugsycook Holy shit, did your parents have any kids that lived?

UrbanSnowshoer
UrbanSnowshoer

 @CO_Native It depends which part of 13th and 14th you're riding on. If you're riding around Speer and  Broadway, there is  a bike line.

joem
joem

 @CO_Native I ride 13th and 14th Avenue because the lights are timed. It takes me half as long to get where I want to go on those streets than it does 16th Avenue.

mkmccalmont
mkmccalmont

@SamTLevin Hoping some wise cyclists chime in here soon...

impercipient
impercipient

 @bill generalize much?  I'm sure that there are bad cyclists out there but I doubt any of them "bait" cars.  Most of the time I stop but sometimes I roll a stop sign.  car drivers say that about stop signs, but not red lights.  cyclists say that about both.  What we really out to do is turn 12th into a cycling only rode and do the same with washington.  

jrodenver
jrodenver

 @plpllawson

 Yeah, those horrifically fit people damn them. The road isn't for all Americans, it's for those that want to go skiing. 'America...where at least I know I'm free'.

yaya
yaya

 @Harley101

I have to pay $150 for a permit to wear a coat over my lawfully carried firearm (it is free to carry it openly) which is a constitutionally protected natural right. Biking on city streets is a privilege and since they are not paying taxes via gasoline I agree a permit is a great idea. Actual enforcement of traffic laws is another.

mmtt
mmtt

Build infrastructure where it's safe to ride a bike, and you won't have to worry about bikes being on the roads.  @Harley101 

jrodenver
jrodenver

 @kalamitykarla

 Traffic laws, and road infrastructure in this city, has been built around the motorized vehicle, not the bicycle. You build something for one use, it's tough to impose another mode of transport on that same infrastructure and laws, hence you have the situation we have now. Cyclist levels are rising, but the infrastrucuture or training (for drivers and cyclists) isn't there.

propylene22
propylene22

 @Michael564 Seriously there are streets that bike have no business being on. Anything with upwards of  4 lanes and 45+ speeds.  Bikes on these roads are just creating a hazard to themselves and everyone else. I rode my bike as my only method of transport for 3 years. It's not hard to get where you're going on side streets, and is usually much faster than taking the main thoroughfares.  

CO_Native
CO_Native

 @joem Are they "timed" because you ride 30 to 35 mph and keep up with traffic or is it because you weave between the cars stopped at the lights making those same cars pass you several times before they get off 13th or 14th?  How many "close calls" have you had on 13th or 14th?

impercipient
impercipient

 @yaya  @Harley101 Are you in a militia?  Do you think the framers had any idea a glock 9 could be carried around underneath a petty coat?  You strike me as the guy who wants less government not more...unless it is convenient to your opinion.

yaya
yaya

Who will pay for this?

 

"Hey neighbor, let me forcefully take the money you have earned to fund infrastructure only I will use since I am too stupid to follow traffic laws"

jrodenver
jrodenver

 @propylene22  

 

If it's much faster than using main throughfares, why do cars use main throughfares? Why does anyone?!

DangerDangerDanger
DangerDangerDanger

 @CO_Native  @joem I'm with @joem on this one.  Cyclists who use their bikes as a primary mode of transportation need to get places and need to be able to do it quickly.  12th is not efficient.  Neither is 7th.  That said, vehicular cycling is not a solution, it's just obnoxious.

 
Loading...