The shadow of Columbine looms over this Jeffco sheriff's race

The shadow of Columbine looms over this Jeffco sheriff's race
Veteran law enforcement officer Jeff Shrader’s candidacy for sheriff has revived questions about his role in the Columbine investigation.

In his nearly thirty years at the Jefferson County Sheriff's Office, Jeff Shrader has been involved in just about every public aspect of the agency's operation, from running its jail to supervising investigations to overseeing a $35 million construction project and the creation of a regional crime lab.

But for some families whose lives were altered by the 1999 shootings at Columbine High School, it's his involvement in one not-so-public operation that matters most — especially now that Shrader has announced that he's running to replace term-limited Ted Mink as sheriff next year.

A few days after the attack on the high school by Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, who killed thirteen and wounded two dozen others before taking their own lives, a group of top government officials met secretly at Jefferson County Open Space offices. The gathering included then-district attorney Dave Thomas, the county attorney and several members of the JCSO top brass — as well as Shrader, a lieutenant at the time. They were there to discuss what the sheriff's office knew about the teen gunmen before the attack, and how to handle press inquiries about what appeared to be a badly bungled investigation a year earlier of Harris.

As a result of that meeting, on April 30, 1999, JCSO spokesman Steve Davis read a prepared statement at a press conference defending his agency's actions. The statement, which had been drafted by Shrader, contained several glaring omissions, mischaracterizations of fact and outright whoppers. It was the start of a campaign to mislead the public, discredit critics and deflect lawsuits that would go on for years, until court actions and a grand jury probe uncovered the coverup.

Shrader has always denied any role in the coverup, saying that he simply conveyed information supplied to him by others. But that's not how Randy Brown sees it.

"I will never trust him," says Brown, a longtime critic of the official Columbine investigation. "He placed the interests of the sheriff's department above the families of murdered children and above the truth. Everyone at the meeting did that, and they kept the secret like the cowards I believe they are."

It was Brown and his wife, Judy, who'd contacted the sheriff's office thirteen months before Columbine to file a report on Harris, who had been boasting on his website about blowing up pipe bombs and had threatened to kill the couple's oldest son, Brooks. Harris was already on probation for breaking into a van, and the investigators the Browns spoke with seemed to take seriously the information they provided, including several pages of disturbing rants printed out from Harris's website.

After the massacre, Sheriff John "Stonewall" Stone insisted that there had never really been an investigation, supposedly because of a lack of cooperation by the Browns. Stone even went on national television and suggested that Brooks Brown, who'd had a strange encounter with Harris shortly before the attack began, was a potential suspect in the case. At the April 30 press conference, the statement Davis read claimed that the Browns had wanted to remain anonymous and hadn't wanted Harris contacted directly; that Harris's website couldn't be accessed; that investigators hadn't been able to link the claims about detonating pipe bombs to any actual pipe bombs found in the neighborhood; and that the matter hadn't involved the number of meetings with police that the Browns claimed.

All of this was provably untrue. And one of the documents that disproved it had been the focus of the secret meeting a few days before that press conference. It was a two-page affidavit for a warrant to search Harris's house and computer, drafted by JCSO bomb tech Mike Guerra. The affidavit noted that investigators had met with the Browns and had located pipe bombs exploded in a field that matched those described on the website.

If Guerra's search warrant had been executed, it's possible the attack on Columbine could have been prevented; police would likely have stumbled upon at least some of the weapons and extensive writings about the planned attack that Harris was already assembling in the spring of 1998. But since the ball had been dropped, the folks at the meeting decided to act as if the affidavit had never existed and to downplay the Browns' complaints. Shrader's statement made no mention of the affidavit — which wasn't made public until 60 Minutes learned of its existence two years later and went to court to get it released, after county officials had failed to provide it in response to numerous open-records requests. (Point of disclosure: I served as a paid consultant to CBS News on the project and was involved in that court battle.)

The coverup was subsequently investigated by a state grand jury under Attorney General Ken Salazar. The grand jury failed to indict anyone, but issued a report expressing some "concern" over the secret meeting, the press conference "omissions" and missing files ("Anatomy of a Coverup," September 30, 2004). Shrader was one of only two law enforcement officers to formally respond to the report, countering that both District Attorney Thomas and the county attorney had told him that Guerra's draft affidavit "was clearly an investigative work in process" and had failed to establish probable cause. By not mentioning it in the statement he wrote, he simply "gave due deference to the conclusions of these officials," he said.

Next Page »
My Voice Nation Help
Karen Trujillo
Karen Trujillo

More secrets surrounding the shooting than mentioned...maybe, by others (top names) in the case. When there's remaining secrets (ie., in a vault for however long), how can this be discussed. If it's a problem find a new candidate.


A fresh face is what that the dept desperately needs . Otherwise you are allowing the existing corruption to flourish .


Chief Shrader is NOT what is needed to head  JCSO. As a 24 year veteran deputy of the department I believe what is needed is a qualified  outside the department candidate to run.  Deputies with in the department have not had ANY significant pay raises in the entire time Sheriff Mink has been in charge. In fact the level of pay for the JCSO in line deputies is in the bottom 1/4th salary levels of ALL Colorado law enforcement agencies while Jeffco enjoys one of the top three highest tax bases of all counties in the state. Oh there was one raise of 2% during Mink's tenure but then the County Commissioners took back a 1% retirement pay match that same year resulting in an effective 1% raise. All this while the employees of JCSO had to endure a 12% increase in health insurance costs. So far Chief Shrader has not expressed any concerns on the poor salary packages for employees of the Sheriff's Office. And let's not forget that new deputies hired recently (within the last 5 years) have been lied to by command staff, which includes Chief Shrader, in that they have not received their scheduled step in pay grade increases as described and portrayed in their hiring packages. There are many issues that the public is not aware of within the department. Hopefully during the campaign these issues will surface so that the public can make a better choice than Chief Shrader.


Had then-Lieutenant Shrader blown the whistle concerning Jefferson County's cover-up of its gross negligence in its handling of Klebold and Harris prior to the massacre, or its response to the massacre, he would have been ostracized, then crucified, by his fellow officers and commanders. 

Once unjustly terminated in retaliation on a pretext of the kind in which cowardly "public safety" bureaucrats specialize, he would have faced hostile judges and politicians closely associated with those complicit in the continuing cover-up. 

In short, his career would have been destroyed, and he would have been hard pressed to seek redress in court.

Even were he successful in getting his case past summary judgment to trial, and persuading a jury to find in his favor, he might well endure the outrage, as has happened previously in Colorado [See "Blackburned", Westword, December 13, 2007, below] of a federal judge wiping his behind with the verdict as a favor to his political allies, unlawfully granting a new trial, and conspiring with Shrader's adversaries to drive Shrader's attorney from the bar on the basis of fraudulent ethics charges.

Like most such public servants, Shrader probably understood this very well, and therefore went along to get along. Doing so has obviously served him well.

Unless and until we live in a perfect world, in which moral courage is routinely rewarded, instead of punished, people such as Shrader will be the only kind who succeed in government.


@Juan_Leg  To his considerable credit, Mayor Hancock recognized this in hiring Chief White, who may not be perfect, but is a breath of fresh air after a long line of chiefs all too happy to preserve the status quo. At the same time, the efforts of Alex Martinez as Director of Public Safety to gut the due process rights of cops and firefighters to make them even more subject to the whim of managers who have repeatedly demonstrated their unfitness to run either department, and therefore more likely to fall into line on whatever serves the political interests of the powers-that-be, on the pretext of weird decisions by Hearing Officers that are no more weird than decisions lapdog Hearing Officers used to make to please the Unions or the City, is as wrong and counterproductive as it could possibly be.  It's downright shameful on the part of a former judge, who should know better, but is, as when he was in the courts, above all a political animal.