Clarence Moses-El to Get New Trial in Rape Case Based on Victim's Dream
Clarence Moses-El and LC Jackson, the man who confessed to the rape for which Moses-El has spent nearly three decades behind bars. Additional images below.
Denver District Attorney's Office via the Colorado Independent
In June, we noted that organizers of a petition drive to recall Denver District Attorney Mitch Morrissey had highlighted one case above all the other Morrissey matters about which they had concerns.
"The District Attorney’s Office has not...re-opened the Clarence Moses-El case," noted a letter shared with Westword by Alex Landau, the former police-brutality victim who was leading the effort. "Mr. Moses-El has served thirty years for a crime someone else confessed to."
The petition drive ultimately failed — but now, Moses-El will reportedly receive a new trial in the case, which involved a victim who identified him as a suspect after envisioning him in a dream and the loss of DNA evidence that might have exonerated him.
The reporter who's done the best work on the Moses-El case is Susan Greene, first with the Denver Post and more recently at the Colorado Independent, whose 2013 overview offers reasons aplenty why Moses-El deserves another shot at justice.
Alex Landau at a 2013 protest, led the petition drive to recall DA Morrissey.
Photo by Danielle Lirette
The latter piece notes that the victim spent much of August 27, 1987 drinking with three men, including LC Jackson.
She subsequently fell asleep on her couch, but she told police she was awakened by an intruder who raped and beat her, breaking bones in her face that led to her losing the vision in one eye.
The victim suffered from poor eyesight before the attack and wasn't wearing her glasses when it took place. Moreover, the room was dark, making the establishment of an ID difficult. But a day and a half after she was raped, she told authorities that the identity of Moses-El, a neighbor, "had come to her in a dream" while she was convalescing in an area hospital.
Greene points out that the victim and Moses-El's wife had gotten into a disagreement the morning prior to the crime. But the victim stood by her claim in a psychiatric examination, during which she boasted that she'd had “premonitions/visions/daydreams on a number of occasions that have come true!”
Moses-El insisted on his innocence from the beginning and begged the cops to test biological evidence from the scene — but "they didn't," Greene writes. As such, Moses-El was convicted and handed a 48-year sentence.
During the years that followed, Moses-El continued to fight for DNA testing — but in 1996, after he'd won the right to have the rape kit analyzed, the evidence, which had been placed in a box marked "DO NOT DESTROY," was discarded by Denver police.
Denver District Attorney Mitch Morrissey.
Moses-El promptly went to court seeking a new trial based on the destruction of material that might have exonerated him. But in a May 1997 ruling on view below, District Court Judge John McMullen rejected this effort. Here's an excerpt from McMullen's order:
The Court concludes that the defendant has failed to establish a violation of due process. There is no evidence either direct or circumstantial of official animus or conscious effort to suppress exculpatory evidence. Reasonable efforts were made initially to preserve the evidence by packaging it, marking that it not be destroyed and making a computer entry that it be held. In fact, it was available for pickup by defendant between November 2, 1995 and December 3, 1995. Its destruction resulted from negligence in failure to notify the assigned detective directly, in not carefully reading computer printouts and not inspecting individual packages and paperwork prior to actual destruction. These were errors of omission which occurred within the context of generally following standard procedures for the destruction of evidence in a high volume property management operation and which related to evidence being held on a seven year old case. They do not amount to "bad faith."
This determination kept Moses-El behind bars. Then, in 2012, Jackson, who wasn't questioned in the earlier rape case even though he'd been present that evening (he's now in jail for sexual assaults committed five years later), wrote Moses-El a letter that reads in part, “I really don’t know what to say to you. But let’s start by bringing what was done in the dark into the light. I have a lot on my heart" — specifically his assertion that he'd beaten the victim after engaging in rough sex but kept silent as Moses-El was prosecuted and convicted.
Although Jackson repeated these assertions in testimony this past July, Moses-El lingered in lock-up. But now that a new trial has been ordered, Morrissey's office must decide to either take Moses-El back to court or toss the case.
We asked Denver DA's office spokeswoman Lynn Kimbrough to comment on these developments. Via e-mail, she sent this statement: "Only speaking to process — the District Attorney will be reviewing the court’s decision, and needs to meet with the victim, and will then determine what the appropriate next steps are in this case. I believe we have thirty days to contact the court to set a new trial date."
In the meantime, those who've backed Moses-El for years have reason for optimism that he'll walk free soon.
Here's the 1997 court ruling.
Get the This Week's Top Stories Newsletter
Every week we collect the latest news, music and arts stories — along with film and food reviews and the best things to do this week — so that you'll never miss Westword's biggest stories.