Five weeks ago, attorney Jerry Stevens was up to his neck in a six-month battle with the Colorado Supreme Court over required continuing legal education courses ("A Real Page-Turner," June 21). Stevens wanted the classes he'd taken at a mystery-writers' convention last fall to count; the court's Board of Continuing Legal and Judicial Education wasn't going for it, and a bitter exchange ensued.
Stevens won. In a letter mailed in late June, he was awarded the five credits he'd demanded for what the board called "the legal-related portions of the world mystery conference."
But for Stevens, a student of psychology, the idea of a simple victory can't be trusted. Somehow it negates the complexity of the human psyche and disrupts the flow of the Hero's Quest. So perhaps Stevens has been left with a Pyrrhic victory, with a finale that was so anti-climactic, such a letdown. "They didn't want to fight," he said shortly after receiving the board's letter. "And they compromised. I knew they'd compromise. That is not the way they should do it. They should fight, and then things would get better -- or work with me, and they'd get better."
If you like this story, consider signing up for our email newsletters.
SHOW ME HOW
You have successfully signed up for your selected newsletter(s) - please keep an eye on your mailbox, we're movin' in!
Ogden had no comment for this story.
Stevens says that the matter of whether lawyers can decide their own continuing-education needs also remains unresolved. "The question is whether [the board] will revisit that."
It's likely Stevens will. This month he plans to attend a seminar in Santa Fe titled "Mysteries and the Law: The Nature of Evidence." The readings? Aeschylus, Dostoyevsky and Melville. Will he try to apply the classes toward his next set of continuing-education credits?
"Oh, yeah, probably."