The Sound and the Furry
Robin Chotzinoff is a national treasure--the Studs Terkel of our time. Her ability to burrow into a person's life and extract its essential juices is uncanny. She helps make Westword by far the most intelligent newspaper in Denver.
Please renew my lifetime subscription!
Albert A. Kashinski
Regarding Robin Chotzinoff's article "So Fur, So Good," in the March 1 issue, I'm not surprised that Mable Mauser didn't want to "get into all that" when asked where she gets her furs. It would be in bad taste, I'm sure, to get into the grisly details of how the animals are treated.
I imagine Ms. Mauser would be appalled if people were trapping little dogs like hers or keeping them in tiny, filthy cages and then anally electrocuting them like they do the animals that have the misfortune of having their pelts valued by the fur industry. Of course, nobody is doing this to dogs, but all animals feel pain and terror.
I cannot admire or respect someone who makes their living off unspeakable cruelty and wanton waste (nobody eats minks, lynx or foxes).
Last summer I took two seven-year-old children to see a lynx that was rescued from a fur farm. She licked their hands and played with them, purring all the while. She was one of the sweetest creatures I have ever met, and she wore her fur coat with more grace and dignity than any human ever could.
Rebecca D. Furr
Whilst reading the "Independence's Day" article by Eric Dexheimer in the February 22 issue, I noticed the quote at the top from Tom Tancredo, president of the Independence Institute, saying, "We're not just an ivy (sic) tower where people sit about smoking pipes and thinking about things."
Ivy tower? Last time I looked, it was an ivory tower, Tom! This, from the head of a "think tank?" More like a "think cup," dontcha think, Tom? Before you preach your conservative pap to the rest of us, go get a clue from a real think tank.
Paul. H. Wigton II
Who's the Boss?
After reading Arthur Hodges's February 22 article "Down by Law," on Denver city attorney Dan Muse, it appeared to me that Mr. Hodges's and Westword's frustrations stem from the fact that Mr. Muse is a good attorney, properly representing his client. Mr. Hodges never did seem to understand who Mr. Muse represents.
Mr. Muse represents the city, embodied by the mayor and Denver City Council. The mayor and the city council represent those of us living in Denver. If you have a problem, you take it up with either the mayor or city council. That is how representative government operates, and that is why you elect the mayor and members of city council to represent you, rather than the city attorney.
It is Mr. Muse's job to vigorously represent his client. He seems to be doing that quite well. A case in point is his advice to the mayor and city council that the legal bills routinely released in their entirety by the auditor's office (according to your article) deserved some scrutiny. If you review the exemptions of the Open Records Act, you will find that certain information is not subject to release. This would include information subject to attorney-client privilege, which would clearly include information on legal bills.
In the legal world, many public and private entities involved in legal disputes are concerned about confidentiality for a variety of legitimate reasons (often when settlements are involved, by the way), and as an attorney, I often offer counsel and assistance on the confidentiality issue. Mr. Muse was evidently astute and careful enough to review the legal bills to determine if they contained any confidential information and then to excise that information. The mayor or city council may want to release the information, anyway, but those are their rights as clients. Mr. Muse is not entitled to make those types of decisions for his clients, only to advise them of the law and then to act according to their wishes.
If you hired an attorney, you would expect him or her to represent you in the same way that Mr. Muse is representing his clients, the mayor and city council. If you would like the city to represent you, all you need do is approach the mayor or city council.
Put That in Your Pipeline
Regarding Arthur Hodges's "The DIA Pipeline," in the March 1 issue:
Having worked for the City of Denver for fifteen years, I got a good chuckle out of Normando Pacheco's statement, "The city's so full of shit it's incredible." The reason it is "so full of shit" is because it has an apathetic citizenry that will continue to ride in the club car watching soap operas and the Broncos until the train runs out of steam.
Denver has had minority politics ever since Federico Pena got elected, and it hasn't elevated minority status. What these "affirmative-action" programs, along with kickbacks, have done is make it possible for the movers and shakers, regardless of race, color, creed, gender or sexual orientation, to manipulate the Golden Goose to their own advantage. They could care less about minorities. It's the same old stories of "The rich get richer" and "I got mine, how the hell are you gonna get yours?" It's business as usual with a small, very small, percentage of minorities benefiting--and that small it appeared to me that Mr. Hodges' and Westword's frustrations stem from the fact that Mr. Muse is a good attorney, properly representing his client. percentage has the social conscience of a boa constrictor.
If, in fact, laughter is the best medicine, then intelligent life in the universe must stay healthy by lining up its UFOs in our atmosphere and watching the fables and foibles of planet Earth.
In Westword's February 22 issue, there was an article ("Buried Alive at Winter Park," by Andy Van De Voorde) concerning the Moffat Tunnel Commission and the Winter Park Recreation Association that contained some statements attributed to me and concerned the Webb administration's handling of negotiations in the dispute.
Since I made those comments (which were correctly reported), I have studied the issue from all sides in numerous meetings with Winter Park and commission representatives, visited the ski-area site in question, and have determined that the Webb administration has taken the correct position.
My comments to Westword were critical of the city's administration and premature, as I spoke prior to obtaining a complete history of the dispute. When appropriate, I will continue to speak out on tough city issues and, if ever necessary again, step forward to correct mistakes.
I apologize to Westword's City Limits readers and Mayor Webb.
Edward P. Thomas
Denver City Councilman
Regarding Eric Dexheimer's "Milking the Rams," in the February 22 issue:
I want to thank you for printing this article on the money-hungry Rams. I have always thought that college ball is continually becoming more and more greedy. I like how you mentioned the CU vs. Notre Dame game; that was a classic example of this.
This article was well-researched and had a lot of great facts on how much money sponsors pay, how much money the school brings in and where the money is going. These costs really bring attention to the fact that many times colleges are just out there for the money. I am glad you were able to bring out this information. Thanks for being straight to the point.
A Brew Story
I thought Kyle Wagner's February 15 Mouthing Off column was well-written and showed an important part of Colorado culture. Just like skiing, a fine microbrew is essential in Colorado. The article went all the way from the popular microbrews to the lesser-known but fine-quality breweries; it let the rookie taster know where to get started and informed the veteran drinker about some of the new flavors out on the scene. The only aspect of the column with which I would disagree was Kyle's opinion on the Breckenridge Brewery's India Pale Ale. I believe this is one of the finest brews out there, and it continues to top my list. However, I will agree that the Larimer Red is yet another quality brew put out by Mike Fahy. I hope he continues to dazzle us with his genius in search of the perfect red.
Once again, I would like to congratulate Westword for printing another quality critique. Cheers!
A Rose by Any Other Name...
This is in response to a letter that appeared in the February 22 edition by someone with my same name. Two of my friends called, thinking it was me. I just want you to print: That Josephine Rose was not me.
Get the Weekly Newsletter
Our weekly feature stories, movie reviews, calendar picks and more - minus the newsprint and sent directly to your inbox.