Earlier this year, a University of Colorado Denver study showed that medical marijuana stores had little impact on areas -- no more so than coffee shops, the researchers found. But there's apparently a lingering perception among the more affluent Not In My Backyard crowd that dispensaries don't make good neighbors, whether it's true or not.
That's among the takeaways of a new CU Denver study, which determined that land-use regulations tend to push dispensaries into low-income neighborhoods. Get details and read the document below.
"Planning for Marijuana: The Cannabis Conundrum" is the work of Jeremy Németh and Eric Ross; the former is a CU Denver prof who directs the Master of Urban Design program at the school, while the latter lectures for the Department of Planning and Design.
In their intro to the piece, published in the Journal of the American Planning Association, Németh and Ross identify two central questions: "1) How do local jurisdictions regulate how and where MMDs operate, and 2) how equitably do common marijuana land use models distribute these facilities, which we define as each tract receiving its fair share of suitable land based on its total land area?"
The answers emerge from a case study of Denver that's applied to three other communities: Los Angeles, Phoenix and Ann Arbor, Michigan. The results suggest that "four popular regulatory models tend to concentrate suitable land in severely socioeconomically disadvantaged tracts...and areas with high proportions of African American, Hispanic, Asian and Native American...residents."
As such, they conclude that "most authorities control where MMDs locate as they do other locally unwanted land uses...such as sex-oriented businesses, halfway houses and liquor stores."
Not that Denver's the most restrictive of the communities studied. The following graphic measuring zoning and proximity restrictions show that the Mile High City ranked as either the first or second-most permissive of the four cities analyzed:
Nonetheless, the area available to cannabis entrepreneurs remains limited here due to rules that include 1,000 foot distances between schools and the like. This situation is depicted graphically in the following map:
Number-wise, as noted by the Denver Business Journal, the study determined that around 46 percent of land in lower-income neighborhoods can be used by cannabis businesses, as opposed to approximately 29 percent in more affluent places.
The authors acknowledge that plenty of dispensaries locate in areas that can't be described as suffering from severe socioeconomic issues, in part because the majority of Denver's developable land lays outside distressed zones. But they see plenty of evidence of NIMBy-ism as it applies to marijuana operations.
A key observation: "Given that most people prefer not to live near these facilities, planners must recognize the potential equity implications of these land use policies."
If you like this story, consider signing up for our email newsletters.
SHOW ME HOW
You have successfully signed up for your selected newsletter(s) - please keep an eye on your mailbox, we're movin' in!
Here's the complete report.
Send your story tips to the author, Michael Roberts.