In the face of 100,000-plus medical marijuana registry applications over the past year, the state's MMJ identification verification process slowed to an agonizing seven- or eight-month turnaround, triggering outcry from the marijuana community. Now, the health department says the backlog is gone and applicants are finally getting their cards within the 35-day timetable required by law.
"We are turning around medical marijuana registry applications within the 35-day window," reports Mark Salley, spokesman for the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. "We are essentially caught up on the backlog."
If you like this story, consider signing up for our email newsletters.
SHOW ME HOW
You have successfully signed up for your selected newsletter(s) - please keep an eye on your mailbox, we're movin' in!
That's quite an accomplishment, considering that as of this past July, the health department still had 73,000 applications stuffed into storage closets waiting to be processed. How'd the agency pull it off? Well, the 56 temporary employees the state hired over the past year to handle the processing surely helped, as did the health department's decision to outsource some of the work to Integrated Documents Solution (which is a branch of Colorado's Department of Personnel & Administration and not a private company, as some people have feared).
While there are still scattered reports of patients waiting more than 35 days for their license, Salley thinks those applications may be among those that were set aside or rejected because they accompanied recommendations from doctors with conditions or restrictions on their licenses. Thanks to patient protests, 1,300 of those apps have now been temporarily reinstated.
While there may be a few old applications still waiting to be processed, Salley is confident that that there will be no backlog left at all by December 31. Talk about joyous way to ring in the New Year.
More from our Marijuana archive: "Medical marijuana: Could most of Colorado Springs' MMJ biz be zoned out of existence?"