Dan Maes is a man of the people, which means that to some extent, he belongs to the people -- like all great leaders, Maes seeks to serve, to represent. That's certainly what he wants to convey, but the people might be a little confused by this:
"I have confidence in the people of Colorado to be too smart for these shenanigans and to seek out a peoples candidate like me whether I have an R, I, or D behind my name."
The phrase "peoples candidate" would seem to imply that he's a candidate made out of peoples -- which, aside from being an unsettling mental image, is also untrue; he is just one man. What he wants there is an apostrophe, but as we can see, it's something he struggles with.
"I oppose the national healthcare plan and support Attorney General Suthers joining of the law suit against it. I oppose it on many levels but primarily I see it as unconstitutional and an intrusion of our states rights. If elected governor I will join the fight against it."
Perhaps he's also opposed to apostrophes, though we can't imagine why, since they promote clarity in sentences and don't cost the taxpayers anything. To be fair, the first error, "Attorney General Suthers joining of the law suit," is a little obscure: The joining of the "law suit" (a suit made of laws? Or "lawsuit?") is an action of A.G. Suthers, meaning that, in a sense, it belongs to the good A.G. -- thus, his name requires an apostrophe behind it, like so: Suthers'. In the case of the second error, Maes surely knows that "states" and "rights" are not just two unrelated plural nouns that just happen to be next to each other; states have rights that belong to them, by God, which would make them "states' rights."
But this next quote would seem to indicate that he's not, in fact, opposed to apostrophes, since he uses one here. Unfortunately, he uses it incorrectly:
"Here are examples of such service:
Boy Scout Leadership as a teen and in his early 20's."
It's unclear what might be possessed by Maes' early 20, so we're guessing he means to pluralize that number, an action that does not require an apostrophe. So maybe he's not opposed to apostrophes -- he does, however, seem to advocate extremely limited comma usage:
"Also, others are effected as vendors and suppliers when these customers forgo investing and production resulting in more lost jobs fueling the downward spiral."
Besides that he's using "effected" incorrectly (he wants the verb "affect"), it's hard to parse out what he's getting at here. Are we worried about forgoing "investing and production," which would lead to a certain result, or are we worried about forgoing investing and only the specific type of production that results in more lost jobs that fuel the downward spiral? Elsewhere, he opts to exclude the poor comma entirely, resulting in a run-on of somewhat epic proportions:
"Illegal immigration is a problem of all borders not just the southern one and it is a matter of national and state security."
And as long as we're on the subject of immigration, we're confused about what "exisiting" means:
"We must enforce exisiting law per Senate Bill 90 that requires law enforcement to investigate anyone one they have "probable cause" to believe is an illegal alien and act accordingly if that person is here illegally. finally, I will introduce legislation to add more state patrol officers to the illegal immigration division."
Also, sentences generally begin with capital letters.
With implementation of these sometimes-tricky but ultimately steadfast grammatical rules, we're confident Dan Maes will go on to great things, no doubt solving many mysteries and, in the process, ending the scourge of bike-share programs, which promote big government and probably homosexuality.
At the very least, his website will look less like a YouTube comment board.