Stripped: Aguilera's voice can't save Burlesque | Film | Denver | Denver Westword | The Leading Independent News Source in Denver, Colorado
Navigation

Stripped: Aguilera's voice can't save Burlesque

She doesn't sing that way because she's had it easy." This is how Tess (Cher), the long-suffering owner of the nightclub at the center of Burlesque, defends her new star, Ali (Christina Aguilera), to the club's jealous, deposed marquee attraction, Nikki (Kristen Bell). The same phrase could substitute as a...
Share this:

She doesn't sing that way because she's had it easy." This is how Tess (Cher), the long-suffering owner of the nightclub at the center of Burlesque, defends her new star, Ali (Christina Aguilera), to the club's jealous, deposed marquee attraction, Nikki (Kristen Bell). The same phrase could substitute as a marketing mission statement for Aguilera herself, who throughout her decade-long adult career has deftly incorporated triumph-over-trauma into her brand.

Aguilera's narrative, presented to the world via lyrics, music videos and interviews, begins with an abusive father and single mother, moves on to battles with depression and bad body image, and has recently been updated to include now-mother Aguilera's very public divorce. Through it all, she seems to repeat a pattern: Admit crippling vulnerability, as in the hit ballad "Beautiful," and then boldly, bitchily and nakedly (often almost literally) embrace the pain, as in the single "Fighter," in which she thanks an unnamed tormentor, because "if it wasn't for all of your torture, I wouldn't know how to be this way now and never back down."

Programmatic by design, Burlesque flattens Aguilera's inherent thorny appeal — the persona that's at once obnoxiously "provocative" and sympathetic — by laughably casting her as the 21st-century torch-singing equivalent of Ruby Keeler in a hodgepodge of Busby Berkeley plots, with none of the Depression-era style or social critique. Aguilera's innocent Ali is a small-town orphan who shows the audience her singing talent over the opening credits, then Greyhounds it from her tiny Iowa hamlet to Hollywood. There she pounds the pavement looking for work and ends up at Burlesque, where she instantly becomes entranced by the stage show: highly gymnastic, quasi-comic lip-synch routines set to standards, performed by a cast of homogenous young things in sailor-motif underwear-as-outerwear. Ali might be impressed, but business is hardly booming: Burlesque lacks both the reliable base appeal of a real strip club (while the costumes are skimpy, they rarely come off), and, with Tess the only member of the company who dares to sing live, a personal touch. Ali knows she can out-sing the recorded vocal tracks, but she keeps her talent to herself while working her way up from waitress to dancer.

Running an unconscionably extended 116 minutes, Burlesque is nearly half over before Aguilera is allowed to be Christina Aguilera. When she finally shows Tess and crew what she can do — singing Etta James's "Tough Lover" without accompaniment — it's the moment the movie's been desperately waiting for. Time stops, audiences both on and off screen simultaneously get tears in their eyes, shivers down their spines and gigantic boners, and the film's many flaws temporarily fall away.

But only temporarily. Directed by Pussycat Dolls creator Steve Antin, Burlesque is so hampered by its influences that it wastes its primary asset: its superstar. Instead of leading with what Aguilera does best, the movie shoehorns her into a rehashed backstage-musical conceit: Good girl is tempted by bad guy, ultimately resists, becomes a star, finds love and saves the show.

Like Chicago before it, Burlesque offers dispiriting evidence that the Hollywood musical is stalled at weak imitation Bob Fosse. Cabaret is clearly Antin's guiding reference, and he confines each musical number to the stage, weaving in off-stage narrative. But what worked as a dialectical tactic in that film, creating ironic tension between the worlds on stage and off, here feels like a tacit admission from Antin that he doesn't have enough faith in the audience's ability to watch an unbroken performance, to read story and character development into the song and dance itself.

To be fair, Burlesque's songs were written by a wide variety of producers and performers (Aguilera co-wrote just three), but not only is there no consistent creative throughline, the songs serve no storytelling function.

Fred Astaire used to insist that his on-screen dances be shot wide and virtually uncut so that there'd be no doubt the performers weren't faking it for the camera. Antin takes the opposite approach, fragmenting each number into quick glimpses of gestures, so that we get no sense of how the dancers are moving through space. What you remember when it's over is the impact of Aguilera's voice, but not what she's singing; montages of body parts, but not the choreography; and Aguilera's face, music-video-trained to hold a close-up so emotionally exaggerated, you might even call it a burlesque.

KEEP WESTWORD FREE... Since we started Westword, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Denver, and we'd like to keep it that way. Your membership allows us to continue offering readers access to our incisive coverage of local news, food, and culture with no paywalls. You can support us by joining as a member for as little as $1.