4

Pit bull controversy: Was man justified to hammer Benny in the head after dog attack?

Jared Jacang Maher's 2009

Westword

feature "

For Two Decades, Pit Bulls Have Been Public Enemy #1 in Denver -- But Maybe It's Time for a Recount
Continue Reading

" examined Denver's controversial pit bull ban -- a subject further illuminated by

photos of the city's pit bull row

and

leaked images of piled-up pit bulls killed

due to the ordinance. Now comes a Channel 31 report that's capable of angering people on both sides of the debate.

The latest story revolves around a two-year-old pit bull mix named Benny. His owner, Arvada's Paul Willis, admits that Benny was aggressive, attacking a neighbor's dog when he tried to introduce the two animals. Then, earlier this week, Benny got loose and went after the neighbor's dog again. The neighbor managed to briefly separate the two, but when Benny immediately resumed the assault, he hit him in the head with the claw end of a hammer. Says Willis, "Benny was still alive and panting on the sidewalk. And then the neighbor said, 'Do you want to finish him off or should I?'"

In the end, animal-control officers euthanized Benny at the scene.

No charges have been filed against the neighbor. But what about Benny? Was he an unruly dog of the sort that can pop up in any breed? Or once-living proof that pit bulls as a group are a danger to communities? Judge for yourself after watching the Channel 31 report below:

 

We use cookies to collect and analyze information on site performance and usage, and to enhance and customize content and advertisements. By clicking 'X' or continuing to use the site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. To find out more, visit our cookies policy and our privacy policy.

Newsletters

All-access pass to the top stories, events and offers around town.

  • Top Stories
    Send: