In yesterday's blog "Were Photos of Grieving Mom in the Post and Rocky intrusive -- or great journalism?," I wrote about the ethics behind the Post's decision to run the image of a mother at the instant she learned her son had been killed by an Aurora police officer on its front page, even though the story itself ran deeper in the paper. In my view, the broadsheet's up-front placement of the photo was exploitative, but I endorsed the Rocky's decision to print a very similar shot (seen above) on an inside page alongside its own report. So, too, does the Rocky's Tina Griego in today's column "Photo of Mother's Pain a Portrait of Love" -- although she acknowledges that plenty of other people apparently feel differently.
Here's what one online commenter wrote about the decision to include the photo:
I don't know what is more disgusting; the initial comments on this thread making light of a man's death or the Rocky's decision to publish a picture of an anguished lady (purportedly the mother). The decision to run the photo is a poor one and is done in the guise of sensationalism. However, even that has a more rational basis than the truly out-of-bounds comments finding humor in this event.
And here's Griego's response:
It's not the circumstance but the photo which prompts me to write. The picture stops others in their tracks, as well. I read complaints online that it is the worst kind of sensationalism and we should not have run it. Yes, it is invasive -- as all photos of grief are. But it is not crass or gratuitous. It is a moment when everything, all the other nonsense in life that manages to keep us preoccupied, is stripped away. It is a moment that reminds us of our common humanity.
Well put. No denying that journalism can be cruel at times, as the woman in this photo has learned firsthand. But the incident was indisputably newsworthy, and while the image in question is unpleasant, it underscores a truth worth reiterating: Our actions have repercussions -- some wonderful, some horrific -- on those we love, and on the people who love us back. -- Michael Roberts
Keep Westword Free... Since we started Westword, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Denver, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Denver with no paywalls.