Meanwhile, the Supreme Court has weighed in on the tricky issue of sex offenders, deciding that a "sexually dangerous" -- i.e., incurable -- inmate can be locked up indefinitely. In doing so, it affirmed the government's argument that Elena Kagan had made in January.
There are few topics as sticky -- or squirm-inducing -- as sex offenders. Over the years, we've written about people who've been falsely accused, and become trapped in the system; we've written about people who are clearly guilty of preying on some of society's most vulnerable members, and have skated past the system. And we've written about controversial treatments, including Teaching Humane Existence, the program that is now at the center of the storm.
And while the topic remains incredibly complex, two things are clear.
The targets of true sex offenders must be protected -- which the Supreme Court did with yesterday's decision in determining that the worst of the worst sex offenders could be kept past their sentences in order to maintain 'the security of those who are not imprisoned but who may be affected by the federal imprisonment of others."
And it is also a topic that needs ongoing discussion -- in public, not behind closed doors.