Readers have their own take on the system. Says Chris:
Anyone that can add and multiply knows PERA isn't and can't be sustainable.Michael explains:
Maybe it would be if the legislature had funded it as it was supposed to, and much of the money wasn't going to hedge funds.Chris asks:
So all of us are supposed to contribute to YOUR retirement? Even fully funded it will still collapse under the weight of future retirees.Dustin argues:
I don't mind paying public servants to retire. That's how countries work.And Kyle concludes:
Good. Get a real job and save for your retirement don't suck on the teat of the taxpayer your whole life.
Keep reading for links to Sirota's stories about PERA.
Legislature Slashes Pension Benefits for Government Workers"
Why Is PERA in High-Fee, High-Risk Investments?"
At PERA, Retirees Face Cuts While Wall Street Gets Millions"
The PERA reform bill includes language designed to give lawmakers more information about controversial investments that have delivered hundreds of millions of dollars in fees to Wall Street firms.
The narrow disclosure language in the pension bill — which still keeps fee details hidden from the general public — was added following our investigation showing that in recent years, PERA has paid more than $1 billion in such fees even as the pension fund has delivered returns that significantly trail a low-fee stock index fund.
The bill slashes cost-of-living increases and requires higher pension contributions from educators, firefighters, cops and other public-sector workers covered by PERA. The changes — opposed by the state’s largest teachers' union and approved after recent teacher protests at the Colorado State Capitol — were designed to shore up the finances of PERA, which faces a $32 billion gap between what it has promised retirees and what it has in the bank.
What do you think of PERA reform? Comment on this post or email [email protected]