According to Drew, corresponding by e-mail, his organization finds Gessler's decision to sue Denver "puzzling." After all, his job is to "supervise and administer our state's elections," but "instead of ensuring that Coloradans can vote, our Secretary of State is taking the unprecedented step of spending public money to keep the public from voting."
Gessler's actions would "purge voters from the rolls simply because they haven't voted in the last year," he goes on, and there are plenty of legitimate reasons why people might have missed an election. Maybe they were out of the country, or serving in the military, or "simply felt uninspired by the choices available to them on the ballot," he maintains. "But to go as far as to file a lawsuit to prevent them from receiving a ballot -- to make it harder to vote -- leaves us questioning the commitment of the Secretary of State to the mission of his own office."In Drew's opinion, Gessler's suit can't have anything to do with voter fraud, since it's so rare. (The recent conviction of David Shackley for double-voting was the first such case in recent memory -- and it occurred because two different municipalities mailed him ballots.) And he doubts Gessler is motivated by saving taxpayer dollars, since suing Denver, an area with a high percentage of registered Democrats (Gessler is a Republican), will be a lot more expensive than sending a ballot that might not be used by an inactive but otherwise eligible voter.
"Denver believes that the opportunity to vote is worth the price of a stamp," Drew writes, "and our Secretary of State should honor that decision, not fight it." He adds: "Any attempt to keep Coloradans from voting is simply shameful."
More from our Politics archive: "Larimer County Republican Party target of new complaint from Colorado Ethics Watch."
