But that doesn't mean the issue couldn't come up again in the future. An amendment to the bill states that, "as soon as practicable, representatives of the medical community, the midwife community, and other interested parties shall meet and discuss the issue in an effort to reach an accord."
Doctors and nurses are generally opposed to granting midwives the ability to suture, while most midwives are in favor. For legislative purposes, the Colorado Midwives Association fell somewhere in the middle; while they support suturing, they were willing to forgo the privilege in order to reach consensus on the bill.
Lusero, along with the group Delivering Natural Care for Families, actively campaigned for suturing. At a hearing in January, Lusero testified that, "After giving birth, I felt more like an athlete than a sick person. I fancied myself a boxer with a split lip who needed my trainer to just give me a quick repair so I could stay in the game."
In the end, Lusero says she's happy with the bill. "I feel good about the final bill," she says. "The vast majority of things we were aiming for wound up in the bill. I think it was a definite success -- not just in terms of the outcome of the bill, but in terms of the organizing we did and the people we activated, and in terms of having a consumer group, which I believe changed the conversation."
But there's still work to be done -- and Lusero and Delivering Natural Care for Families plan to be part of the conversation. "One of the things I learned was that even though ultimately, the medical lobby wasn't officially opposing the bill in the end, there was still a general lack of trust of midwifery and midwives. We still have more work to do," she says.
For a complete rundown of changes included in Senate Bill 88, check out this handy document, courtesy of Delivering Natural Care for Families.
More from our Politics archives: "John Hickenlooper to sign Senate Bill 60 today: Raise a glass of any beer you like!"
