This week's cover story, "You're in Bad Hands" (click

for the main article, and

for the sidebar), digs into the story behind the whopping $37 million bad-faith verdict a Boulder jury recently awarded to Jennifer Latham, a mother of four who was severely injured in a 2005 auto accident -- and then had her insurance taken away by Assurant Health because she supposedly misrepresented her medical history on an application she submitted months earlier.

If you like this story, consider signing up for our email newsletters.

SHOW ME HOW

X

Newsletters

_{All-access pass to the top stories, events and offers around town.}

• No Thanks
• Sign Up

X

SUCCESS!

You have successfully signed up for your selected newsletter(s) - please keep an eye on your mailbox, we're movin' in!

Among other evidence, the jury viewed excerpts of Assurant Health CEO Don Hamm's testimony before a House subcommittee last June.

Hamm told the assembled his company's applications ask straightforward, easy-to-understand questions. But when Michigan representative Bart Stupak asked him to answer one of the questions on the application -- well, see what happens starting about ninety seconds into the video embedded above.

For more of Hamm's duel with Stupak, go here. And don't miss the testimony of Peggy Raddatz about how Assurant Health (also known as Fortis and Time) pulled her brother Otto's health insurance during chemotherapy because of notes in his prior medical records about gallstones that Otto's doctor never told him about.

For more on the jurors' decision, check out our previous blogs.

• News
• Politics