Reporter Melanie Asmar's recent post juxtaposing abstinence education versus what she termed more "realistic" sex ed drew a passionate response from one reader. She feels the question should go well beyond whether or not instructors will still be able to use bananas and condoms.
Here's Mimi's post:
". So... if Colorado wins the grant, will school districts that favor contraceptive-based (read: realistic) sex ed be forced to throw out all those bananas and condoms" Okay, sex-ed is either contraceptive-based or not? This is rather narrow minded. First of all, contraception is about pregnancy prevention, not sex. The two are related, but not the same. There is plenty of "realistic" education without talking about contraception. Am I advocating that we don't even mention how to prevent pregnancy? I am not. However, I've got to wonder if we're not promoting sexual activity when we explain ALL of the ways one can have sex while diminishing the chances of pregnancy -- non-abstinence contraception has it's limitations, after all. As for ensuring students "have access to science-based, comprehensive, medically-accurate, culturally relevant, and age-appropriate sexuality education," are we including sexually transmitted diseases and their consequences? Are we going to make sure each student understands that hormonal contraception alone does nothing to prevent STDs? Are we going to talk about the psychological impact of having a sexual relationship without commitment, such as marriage? Are we going to tell them that the likelihood of cervical cancer increases with the number of partners a woman has? What about the long term effects of abortion? No matter how you describe it, it's the killing of a human individual. Are we going to prepare young women for the hormonal upheaval of having a pregnancy suddenly terminated by abortion? Are we going to talk about the differences of how young men view the sexual act versus how young women do? Or are these just the buzz words to criticize abstinence education in favor of pushing medical drugs and paraphernalia we call "contraception?"
Read more takes in our Comment of the Day archive.
Keep Westword Free... Since we started Westword, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Denver, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Denver with no paywalls.