Comment of the Day

Reader: Stoned Driving Blood Tests Are a Violation of Human Rights


Medical marijuana patient Melanie Brinegar was arrested on an accusation of driving under the influence of drugs, and a blood test showed that her THC level was nearly four times the legal limit.

Nonetheless, Brinegar decided to fight the allegation, arguing that THC lingers in the system for far longer than alcohol does and pointing out that she had not been driving in a manner that denoted intoxication (she was pulled over for an expired license tag). And a jury agreed, finding her not guilty.

Our post about Brinegar drew a large response from people who feel the THC standard established by Colorado is an unfair effort to equate marijuana with alcohol even though the substances are vastly different.

Here are three examples.

Jeh Cranfill writes:
Wonderful to hear! I hope more and more people fight these charges. The limit set is in no way scientific or indicative of actual impairment.
Clint Jahn writes:
The problem with testing for THC is that it remains in your system for nearly a month after last use. While I support prosecuting drivers for DUI if under the influence of marijuana, those prosecutions should be backed up by additional evidence such as video evidence of impaired driving, an accident, or a pipe in the passenger compartment of the vehicle. I see people smoking weed while driving on a regular basis, and that is an easy bust. Prosecuting someone simply based on an inaccurate and misleading blood test is not good policy.
Kathy Wedzik writes:
Drug testing means nothing...we have receptors in out bodies that attract and hold onto THC..does not mean your are impaired..this why drug testing for THC/cannabis is not reliable...never has been.... I stand by my assessment that we are engaging in human rights violations and discrimination when it comes to cannabis by way of these drug tests.
Send your story tips to the author, Michael Roberts. For more memorable takes, visit our Comment of the Day archive.
KEEP WESTWORD FREE... Since we started Westword, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Denver, and we'd like to keep it that way. With local media under siege, it's more important than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" program, allowing us to keep offering readers access to our incisive coverage of local news, food and culture with no paywalls.
Michael Roberts has written for Westword since October 1990, serving stints as music editor and media columnist. He currently covers everything from breaking news and politics to sports and stories that defy categorization.
Contact: Michael Roberts