How small does an election have to be in order for Denver officials not to screw it up? Seriously -- does the turnout have to be in the single digits for ballot hawks to come up with a final tally on the actual day of the vote? Why the hell is counting still going on two days later? Do our government representatives really expect us to believe the problem was a "last-minute surge" of voters? Given that this was an off-year election, wouldn't any such gusher be a relative trickle compared to, say, a year when a President is being chosen? Speaking of which, do these people know that very sort of election will be taking place this time next year? Have they forgotten the election meltdown in 2006 -- or the humiliation and retribution that followed? And why has totting up votes suddenly gotten so damn difficult? Haven't we as a nation been doing this for two-centuries plus? Is there the slightest chance someone in Denver government will figure out how to improve the process over the next year? Or will these same rhetorical questions be just as applicable in November 2008 as they are in November 2007? Anybody? Hello? -- Michael Roberts
Keep Westword Free... Since we started Westword, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Denver, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Denver with no paywalls.