In a Senate judiciary committee hearing yesterday, Senator Jeff Sessions, an Alabama Republican,quizzed Homeland Security secretary Janet Napolitano
aboutthe firing of ICE agent Cory Voorhis
. (The exchange can be seen in the video above; it begins at approximately the six minute point.)
But is Sessions, who tries a variety of pronunciations of Voorhis' name without coming close to the correct one, really all that interested in this particular case? In all likelihood, the real target of his comments was Stephanie Villafuerte, President Barack Obama's choice for U.S. Attorney. The judiciary committee will decide what happens next with Villafuerte's nomination, and Sessions, the ranking Republican, is sending a message that he'll ask questions about the current controversy swirling around her if given half a chance.
Around the same time Sessions was mangling Voorhis' name, Examiner.com blogger (and political partisan) Jan Tyler's post floating the question of whether Governor Bill Ritter and Villafuerte had or are having an affair was making the rounds.
Tyler's information is based on "a source who chooses not to disclose their identity," which doesn't constitute proof by even the most minimal standards -- and that's an absolute requirement in cases like these, as pointed out in this space yesterday. A claim by a person who won't even allow his or her name to be used isn't exactly on par with a photo in front of the Monkey Business.
At this point, though, the affair rumor only adds to the political risks now facing the Villafuerte nomination. With Sessions' Voorhis rap implying that he might push for a hearing on the nom, the pro-Villafuerte forces have more evidence than ever that the anointment process could get ugly.
Republicans clearly scent blood in the water. They recognize an opportunity to embarrass both Obama and Ritter, who's up for reelection in 2010 and is perceived as vulnerable.
Will Villafuerte stand pat and fight for the position? Or will she withdraw, citing her disinterest in becoming a distraction? The decision could go either way -- and it may well come sooner rather than later.
Keep Westword Free... Since we started Westword, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Denver, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Denver with no paywalls.