Top

news

Stories

 

Carved in Stone

Twenty years after Jim Stone first blew the whistle on Rockwell International, he got his day in court -- the Supreme Court.

Pondcrete.

The word echoed off the marble walls of the U.S. Supreme Court, the bedrock of a legal system that's lasted well over two centuries, with the eight judges considering the case of Rockwell International Corp. et al. v. United States et al. (Justice Stephen Breyer had recused himself) possessing a collective legal experience almost as lengthy.

But plutonium has a half-life of 24,000 years -- and the pondcrete that was supposed to safely store the toxic pond sludge created at Rocky Flats Nuclear Weapons Plant lasted barely a year before the blocks started falling apart.

Jim Stone had warned Rockwell International, which ran the plant sixteen miles upwind of Denver for the Department of Energy from 1978 to 1989, that the pondcrete process wouldn't work. Hired at the plant as an engineer in 1980, in October 1982 he'd sent a memo to Rockwell's management detailing his concerns about a proposal to mix sludge from the waste-storage ponds with concrete -- and suggested some tests. Instead, Rockwell went ahead and manufactured the pondcrete as originally proposed.

Stone wasn't around to see the pondcrete fail. In March 1986, Rockwell laid off its principal troubleshooter.

On July 5, 1989, Stone became its principal troublemaker, filing suit under the federal False Claims Act, which prohibits a contractor from submitting fraudulent claims to the U.S. government, and charging that Rockwell had concealed environmental, safety and health problems from the DOE. By then, it was no secret that there were big problems at Rocky Flats, which had produced plutonium triggers in almost complete secrecy for decades. On June 6, 1989, the FBI had led a pre-dawn raid on the facility, with 75 FBI and EPA agents joining in the search. What they were looking for was revealed three days later when the search warrant obtained by lead FBI investigator Jon Lipsky was unsealed, spilling out allegations that Rocky Flats had illegally disposed of dangerous waste.

Some of those allegations had come straight from Stone.

"We'd been working on the investigation for almost a year," Lipsky says of his first meeting with Stone. "He was my first insider. I had a pretty good idea of how Rocky Flats was put together, but it was almost unbelievable. He was talking about stuff he knew -- and he was a very intelligent man, an engineer, on a different plane than I am. He was rattling it all off, and I had to stop to ask questions. Some of the stuff I could corroborate because I'd reviewed the waste streams out there."

But Stone had many more surprises for him, including 2,300 pages of documents -- one of them his 1982 memo -- and the stunning revelation that the plant's ductwork was full of lost plutonium.

The evidence seized in the raid was presented to a grand jury -- the first special grand jury in Colorado history -- that was convened in August 1989. Two years later, the jurors were getting ready to indict eight individuals -- some from Rockwell, some from the DOE -- in connection with what they regarded as an "ongoing criminal enterprise" at Rocky Flats. Instead, the government cut a deal with Rockwell. In March 1992, the corporation pleaded guilty to ten environmental violations at Rocky Flats. As part of the deal, Rockwell was to pay $18.5 million in fines -- less than it had earned in bonuses for operating the plant. Lipsky was prohibited from mentioning Stone's charges in the plea agreement.

That December, Rockwell filed a motion to dismiss Stone's complaint, claiming that the whistleblower was not an "original source," as required under the False Claims Act. A judge disagreed, and in 1995 the U.S. government joined the case on Stone's side. Four years later, a jury decided many points in favor of Stone, and on June 10, 1999, the court awarded the plaintiffs treble damages of $4.2 million.

Stone has yet to collect a cent.

Rockwell appealed, again arguing that Stone was not the original source of the pondcrete allegations. The 10th Circuit Court disagreed, twice. And finally, Rockwell petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court.

On December 5, 2006, more than twenty years after Stone was dismissed by Rockwell, seventeen years after the government raided its own plant, Stone's case finally reached the Supreme Court, and the word "pondcrete" echoed off those marble walls.

Jim Stone wasn't there to hear it. The 82-year-old has Alzheimer's and wasn't well enough to travel. But his original attorney, Hartley Alley, was there, sitting in the courtroom while a lawyer with the big New York City firm he'd long ago brought in argued on Stone's behalf. (Stone's lawyers also have yet to collect a cent; meanwhile, Rockwell's lawyers are asking the government to foot their $20 million bill.)

The first case that morning had devolved into a discussion of California's definition of "joyriding." "Where's the joy in that?" asked Chief Justice John Roberts. "The joy, apparently, is you don't get convicted of theft," responded Justice Antonin Scalia. Of course, neither had anyone at Rockwell, since the 1992 deal precluded prosecuting any individuals.

And any remaining joy left the courtroom when Rockwell's attorney repeated the argument that Stone could not have been an "original source" of the allegations. Although the 10th Circuit had determined that Stone had "direct and independent knowledge," the lawyer said that the pondcrete hadn't been made until after Stone left Rocky Flats, and that he could have learned of its subsequent failure in the media. Stone's "central observation was not even presented to the jury" that decided the initial case in favor of the whistleblower, Scalia pointed out. But then, Justice Ruth Ginsberg noted, Rockwell had misrepresented the safety of pondcrete, too. In fact, one exec had told the jury that pondcrete would be just like the concrete in your driveway.

1 | 2 | Next Page >>
 
  • Mort 06/24/2007 2:42:00 PM

    If a qui tam action is jurisdictionally barred, then the person who is the Relator, is deemed a parasite, in effect, via a "parasitical action". This is the designation concocted by the DOJ to smear citizens, and subject them to hositility. It has been part of the flawed 1986 Claims Act. Jim Stone was caught in that web of a trap, and what did his attorneys do to protect him from that vast injustice ? Apparently, not much that was effective, given how Stone was branded as one who was engaged in "claims smuggling", too.(Scalia ruling) Around 75 % of qui tam actions are not intervened in by the Dept of justice, and many of those have been jurisdictionally barred. Obviously, if an action is barred the qui tam citizen can't be made "whole". The 1986 False Claims Act should be renamed the Big JURISDICTIONAL BAR ACT to hurt any American who seeks to rectify fraud on federal accounts.

  • Bob 06/19/2007 10:17:00 PM

    Not many civil qui tam actions are launched(for some private citizen(U. S. ex rel) in the wake of a criminal indictment. It was in the mid 1940's, when qui tam actions were shut down( the then AG Biddle hated qui tam actions), and then they were barred for about 40 years( Congress passed Acts which caused that to protect fraud against USA accounts), until 1986. Thus, the Stone case must be looked at on how the DOJ cooked up its amended complaint (in the broader picture of qui tam history), knowing of the criminal proceeding, to set up a large DOD contractor, to abest such defenses(on procedural jurisdictional grounds), then resulting in a impact: one seeking to set some wide bar to impact other qui tam cases--all over the USA. The New York law firm who, used Stone's qui tam, even filed(or was involved with) another civil law suit, seeking to get unsealed grand jury material in Colorado. The New York law firm, who purported to represent Jim Stone provided him not one benefit in the end. NADA, Ziltch. Can they(PAUL WEISS, NYC/ D. C.) tell ohers in Colorado where the Stone family goes to clear his name, he was not involved in "claims smuggling". He was in fact at Rocky Flats---as a person who was not blind. He was never made whole for being wrongful discharged, either, which fact can hardly be over looked in the full sum of events.

  • Larson 06/16/2007 1:35:00 PM

    The DOJ seeks leverage over qui tam persons to play game with them. When one qui tam attorney settled a case, and got some money, it was deemed attorney fees. The attorney split that amount with the Relator(qui tam guy). The DOJ sued to get 70 %, of that. Although, no real major proceeds were obtained in the suit from the large corporate defendant, the DOJ would rather go after amounts(chump change called attorney fees( Roland G suit) to prevent the qui tam from being made fully "whole". This thing with Stone(recent Sup Crt ruling) will produce many abuses by the DOJ to hurt qui tam citizens in the future. Congress could care less, it gets so much PAC money from large corporations(some who have been defendants in qui tam actions via Trade Associations, and afiliated) , it don't care about the abuses hurting people like Mr Stone i. e. qui tam plaintiffs.

  • Brody 06/08/2007 4:29:00 PM

    The 1986 False Claims Act induced persons to come forward, then subjects them to attacks, and promotes ruin, and financial harm. Further, it has the effect of turning a person's own supposed attorney against the person. The history of cases under the 1986 False Claims Act demonstrate that. Stone is just one more example. Jim Stone is maliciously branded as one who was "smuggling claims", but he never amended any complaint, the Dept of Justice did that in conjunction with Stone's supposed attorneys. Stone was never made "whole", the 1986 False Claims Act was illusory, and is more designed to protect corporations, who rip off USA accounts. The(Senator) Grassley dupe job really needs to be renamed; the 1986 Protection of crooks ACT. Maybe that is what Grassely(and his beltway ilk) wanted all along, impediments to pursue actions so as to hamstring litigation so as to favor large corporations , who can evade accountability, all part of the dupe and sucker ruses to undermine diligent actions against large corporations, who rip off federal accounts.

  • Laney 06/06/2007 2:33:00 PM

    Paul Weiss , went along with amending its own client out of the case, as it turned out. This is the longest "non case" in U. S history. Stone's initial Colorado attorneys filed it in 1989, it was not until around almost 9 years later that the Dept of Justice out of D. C. and Paul Weiss out of New York came in to Colorado to do what eventually resulted in Jim Stone being pondcreted. Some "knolwedge" defense set up for large corporate law firms(for Rockwell), the fall out from this travesty. Efectively, it turned Stone's supposed so called attorney against Stone, Vullo even admitted she never called Stone to testify in person. Sad, 18 years after the case was filed, the Court rules there was no jurisdiction over any complaint filed "for Stone", but the complaint filed for Stone(as amended) was tampered with by some who were not his attorneys---- DOJ officials, who caused him to be zeroed out as a viable qui tam plaintiff. Not the most shining moment for attorneys from New York who drifted into Colorado, and allowed they supposed client to be PONDCRETED, beneath a layer of sludge put out by the white collar corporate bar. But Paul Weiss = big Corporate it is a go to firm for big corporations. Jim Stone was just a poor citizen from Colorado.

  • Bradley 05/30/2007 7:54:00 PM

    In the 1970's, Paul Weiss was seeking to bar a qui tam action on jurisdictional grounds, as reported in the U S. v. Burmah Oil case( 558 F. 2d 43(1977), which was even in the famous legal piece by Professor Erwin Chemerisky on Fraud and corruption against the government. Strange, how Jim Stone gets falsely branded as engaged in "claims smuggling", after matters were handled by Paul Weiss. This is a disgrace, since Paul Weiss had a duty to diligently represent Stone--since it purported to claim he was its client. Paul Weiss has a big biz doing work for major corporations, and Jim Stone was just a powerless citizen in Colorado. Something just don't look right the way matters evolved in this case. Plus, what about Paul Weiss principals doing work on overseas transactions, impacting big oil interests, and banking and Hedge FUND interests. Jim Stone never deserved how he was so badly treated by the legal process, the way things were so rigged around. The DOJ in D. C. took Paul Weiss on a ride, and it is known how the DOJ has had a hostility towards qui tam actions, since the days of Attoney General Biddle. A book was written on Biddle on how he was a corrupt official, and it was written by another DOJ attorney. Interesting, how the Bush DOJ is now the focus of Congressional concern on how the DOJ has become a tool of crooked politicians, and some who seek to undermine accountability by dirty tricks This Stone matter warrants a lot more investigation, in view of other matters coming out on Rocky Flats, and all the workers who were subjected to deadly conditions, as some want all that to be swept under the rug. Jim Stone was a great American--others will not allow his good name to be smeared by fixers, cons, and double dealing political hucksters. Jim Stone lives in the memory of American history, and his good name is alive in many parts in Colorado-as a good decent citizen, who cared, about safe conditions for workers. Westword did a good job to publish its piece on Stone, and more will come out, as time goes on.

  • Sue 05/29/2007 5:32:00 PM

    The value of the NY law firm to Jim Stone was zero-or maye even some negative value. Yet, the NY law firm had some pending claim for $ 10 million in attorney fees. Because, the NY law firm was involved in some amended complaint, with the DOJ, Jim Stone was pleaded out of the law suit, but then he is the one left to be injustly smeared as some "claims smuggler". Yet, when the law suit was first brought by Colorado attorneys, the suit was for massive hundreds of million, yet, strangely, that was not pursued, or was Jim Stone protected against wrongful discharge. This D. C.(East coast) shoddy treatment of people like Stone warants to be investigated--he was never treated right by the matters that happened in the so called legal process, shuffling, which continues to raise many questions.

  • Maranda 05/25/2007 7:44:00 PM

    The title of Calhoun's piece would have been more aptly noted as FRAMED IN STONE. Jim Stone was framed, and he did have knowledge( he worked at Rocky Flats for 6 years), however, just like vote counters in FL had knowledge, but when Scalia(Mr Sicilian gesture @ his red mass is intent on rigging something), he can cut up some powerless U. S. citizen, so pretty soon, he looses his citizenship in the wake of utterly corrupt power gone mad. Protecting corrupt power is Scalia's deal, and it should worry Congress, and every taxpaying American.

  • Mat 05/22/2007 3:36:00 PM

    This case sets a record, a group of attorneys, who embroiled a man(Stone) in legal proceedings for 18 years, and then the court rules it has no jurisdiction, only after the 18th year. The False Claims Act seeks to induce citizens to come forward to protect the USA interests, then it provides little protection for the citizen. Stone never amended the complaint, yet he is branded with some charges he was engaged in "smuggling(claims)". Scalia's decision is one of the most absurd decisions ever written by a Judge, & seems to be designed to protect those who defraud Federal accounts. Kinda typical, for a guy who was at the Univ of Chicago law school who represented OPEC, and it shieks.

  • Sheik 05/20/2007 3:27:00 PM

    How do you like paying $ 3.40/ per gallon for gasoline. Antonin Scalia represented OPEC in price fixing matters when he was in prviate practice. He sure fixed Stone to fry Stone's goose, to make him an non-American qui tam plaintiff.( via NO JURISDICTION to hear anything of Stone in a USA law suit) Pay slaves, seems to be the Scalia message, as he jetted down on the big jet to go duck hunting with Dick Cheney, and the oil service tycoons.

  • Tony 05/19/2007 8:41:00 PM

    The cycle of disintegration and ROTTING: Two years before Jim Stone went to the FBI in 1987, pondcrete was poured into blocks, and even Rockwell, and its attorneys admit that. Obviously, the pondcrete became insolid before it was reported in the News in May 1988. With 1,000's of blocks of disintegrating pondcrete blocks that were rotting, and falling apart on the pads at Rock Flats, it was an awful mess, the fact that it involved radiation messes, as well only intensified the nuclear problem. Why did Stone go to the FBI, after the rotting pondcrete blocks had been on the pads for some time, it was not to discuss deer poo pop droppings. But, Scalia showed his considerable bias for large big PAC $$$$ contractors, who extract vast billions out of federal coffers, as if some new neocon class gets special protection. His ilk rigged chads in the 2,000 elections, and so now it plays more games. Rotting nuclear pondcrete blocks did not have a 1/2 life of 240 years, or 24,000 years, the time for it too disintegrate was very short from the time the crumbling blocks were placed on the pads at Rocky Flats. Boeing extracs vast billions out of federal coffers, that is what Justices like Scalia are most impressed about, as some GOP kick back system. Rotten justice does have a full stench, and its 1/2 life is indeed long, and people see it, all over America

  • Tony 05/19/2007 8:41:00 PM

    The cycle of disintegration and ROTTING: Two years before Jim Stone went to the FBI in 1987, pondcrete was poured into blocks, and even Rockwell, and its attorneys admit that. Obviously, the pondcrete became insolid before it was reported in the News in May 1988. With 1,000's of blocks of disintegrating pondcrete blocks that were rotting, and falling apart on the pads at Rock Flats, it was an awful mess, the fact that it involved radiation messes, as well only intensified the nuclear problem. Why did Stone go to the FBI, after the rotting pondcrete blocks had been on the pads for some time, it was not to discuss deer poo pop droppings. But, Scalia showed his considerable bias for large big PAC $$$$ contractors, who extract vast billions out of federal coffers, as if some new neocon class gets special protection. His ilk rigged chads in the 2,000 elections, and so now it plays more games. Rotting nuclear pondcrete blocks did not have a 1/2 life of 240 years, or 24,000 years, the time for it too disintegrate was very short from the time the crumbling blocks were placed on the pads at Rocky Flats. Boeing extracs vast billions out of federal coffers, that is what Justices like Scalia are most impressed about, as some GOP kick back system. Rotten justice does have a full stench, and its 1/2 life is indeed long, and people see it, all over America

  • Pete 05/19/2007 4:17:00 PM

    When was the first pondcrete block poured at Rock Flats, does anybody in the USA, or Colorado know ?

  • Sarg 05/15/2007 3:09:00 PM

    Stone goes to the FBI, then Rockwell uses information from assorted sources to attack Mr Stone. However, the other sources were not qui tam plaintiffs. So, since Mr Stone was seeking to help the USA, as it was the real party in interest( U S ex el), was the FBI more intersted in helping Rockwell defeat Mr Stone being made "whole"( later on), so as to make the inducments of Congress just empty illusory con jobs. By the way, what is it about all those news articles on Jon Lipsky(ex FBI agent in Denver) claiming he was orderd to lie by DOJ/ FBI higher ups ? Did the DOJ call Stone before the 1989 Special Grand jury ? Colorado sure did not see Wes McKinely(Ambushed Writer of a book), or Professor Turley from the East coast spend 18 years in court as a plaintiff. It is looking more and more like Stone became a target to attack him, and the FBI caused him to be set up(to allow him to be tampered with him(BIG TIME), or never wanted to reveal Stone came to the FBI as an American citizen to spill the beans, and Stone was allowed by the FBI to be attacked(by Rockwell as some proxy) as some pay back for him coming out from behind the nuclear code of silence on crimes to hurt U S workers, & to report crimes, and other illegal activity. Seems a lot of PAC money floated around by Boeing and Rockwell to the beltway fellows, too. America never saw the FBI guy testify in the Stone case, which is most curious, and it stands out, with RED FLAGS, and red lights flashing. This should cause America great concerns on how a witness like Mr Stone was mistreated, as he was targeted to be branded as a "smuggler", showing no good deed of a stellar citizen(Stone) in Colordo goes unpunished.

  • Del 05/14/2007 7:15:00 PM

    Sad, Stone got amended out of his own case, got pleaded out, got disinfo outed. Apparently, the DOJ came into the case with some big New York Firm in the mid 1990's, and Jim Stone became an insolid qui tam plaintiff, about 17 years after other attorneys had filed a qui tam action for him. Stone had "claimed he discussed pondcrete allegations with the FBI". Yet, Rockwell claimed Stone did not do so with the FBI. How does Rockwell its army of attorneys know so much of what Stone told the FBI ? However, given this key issue, the FBI (or its guy) did not testify in the qui tam proceedings. Now, Stone is dead, passed away--and branded as a "claims smuggler". The injustice that reeks from this case is way beyond "rotting" insolid pondcrete, it shows how the DOJ power clique, with DOE and its political CABAL, took Stone and his attorneys for some ride, and it was not a joy ride.

  • Ray 05/13/2007 7:03:00 PM

    To defeat a qui tam plaintiff from being made "whole" on entitlement, the DOJ in D. C. illegally took grand jury testimony in violation of federal rules(laws), and gave summaries of it to a court in Texas. The case involved oil companies cheating the USA out of vast millions(a civil case). Plus, one set of qui tam plaintiffs used the DOJ to turn against an other set(of qui tam plaintiffs). DOJ plays lots of games in the qui tam area. Even Congressional hearings were held to interfere in matters to seek to smear some qui tam plaintiffs, by some in Congress who got large PAC $$$$ from big oil companies. See POGO hearings before Congresswoman Cubin After the DOJ illegally took grand jury testimony from a grand jury in D. C. to give to a federal court in Texas, the DOJ sued(civilly) a federal employee in D. C. (in the Dept of Interior), who had given informaiton to the Project on Government Oversight( POGO). See U S v POGO and Berman. The illegal DOJ misconduct in leaking grand jury testimony is set forth at IN RE SEAL CASE, 250 F.3d 764(2001) It is most ironic how in Colorado, some from New York and the GWU Law professor in D. C., have been seeking for years to get the Grand jury testimony of the Special 1989 Grand Jury in Colorado(on Rocky Flats). This is even more astounding in the wake of Jim Stone being ruled that he was not an original source. It seems Paul Weiss( Stone's Esquires) ends up in the middle of key beltway information matters involving the FBI, DOJ, CIA, and the White House. See Yellow Cake caper in the retaliation that ruined the CIA career of Val Plame( amatter now in court where Plame suing Libby), and after the conviction of Scooter Libby(Chief Assistant to Cheney) on obstruction of justice chargs.( linked to Richard Cheney, and his Iraq things) The case involving the qui tam stealing of oil royalities impacted Colorado, too. The DOJ illegally tampered with grand jury testimony in its effort to defeat a qui tam jurisdiction, and entitlement of others in a qui tam civil case. Is it any wonder, that after the Supreme Court decision in Rockwell, Stone's main NYC attorney had no comments to the press. Paul Weiss is pulling off a special $ 5 million Defense Fund for Scooter Libby as his attorney. Of course, the fat kats who dump money into that fund)or cause such $$$$ flow)----it is highly top SECRET. Alan Simpson(ex Senator), and other big shots are noted as big movers to raise money for the Special Libby Defense FUND. Simpson's law firm in Wyoming was involved on defending an entitiy alleged to have cheated U. S. Accounts. No wonder, Jim Stone got put through a mean meat grinder, the way things played out, so many questions remain on this tragic incident. They are not likely to go away, although Stone has passed away, and some want total silence to be the veil covering matters to keep america in the dark.

  • Beth 05/13/2007 5:00:00 PM

    Paul Weiss, a big New York Law firm, was involved in the federal law suit, IN RE Special Grand Jury 1989, seeking to get grand jury testimony, of some of the witnesses who testified before the subject grand jury(looking into alleged criminal matters). Paul Weiss never proved that Stone was a original source in the civil qui tam action(in Sup Crt). Why Paul Weiss never called the FBI guy in the civil qui tam suit since Stone had reported stuff to the Denver FBI is mind boggling. The FBI guy had testifed in another civil case (in Colorado) in a class action by home owners. The Civil Division of the DOJ took Stone's New York attorneys on quite a ride--as Stone got zeroed out, as if he had no knolwledge, as ruled by the Supreme Court.

  • Sarducio 05/12/2007 2:16:00 PM

    As some of you may know, LiL Capo, the Don Tony was the one who did the "Pondcrete" ruling on Stone, that so got Westword to probe the meaning & the depths of nuclear sludge near Denver. Now Tony--Soprano -Scalia, is trying to firmly secure his Sicilian Godfather image. Hey, it is on photo. Since my Italian friends may be experts on the words he used with his hand gesture, and their meaning, have at it , see google references(below--with photo, a semi U tube on TONY). First, he lied about his hand jesture in Church(very unjudge like), then wrote a letter to the Boston Catholic paper(very CYA like), run by the Church, then parsed his words(very Spin like), see his gesture(all over googles); You decide. The photo is worth 2,000 words. Tony used some Latin expressions in his Jim Stone ruling, too.... see the entire ruling, besides "pondcrete". But of course, he would claim the photographer has no "knowledge". but he did---see the photo, and how Tony-- BIG POWER TRIPPER-- is trying to cover his arse for his dicey antics--in Church, no less. See on googles 1)Smith "Fired" From Pilot Over Scalia Photo 2)Photographer: Herald got it right - Local & Regional - BostonHerald.com 3) After Snapping Scalia Exclusive, Boston Photog Loses Freelance

  • Gomer 05/11/2007 4:01:00 PM

    In the mid 1980's a grand jury refused to issue up criminal indictments prsented by the DOJ on some Rocky Flats matters(the machine shop caper incidents). This was a separate matter from the Ambushed Grand Jury, who seemed to be real hungry for a lot of Press RELEASES. It(Grand jury members Wes et al) never went into Court--a Press Release is not a court action, as even law Professor Turley must know, given all the press release mileage he got out of the Grand jury stuff from his beltway D. C. Professorship stints. Also, the Jim Stone qui tam (civil) action was not the only qui tam action on Rocky Flats. There were at least two other civil qui tam actions. One against Rockwell proceeded. The other, the Ridenour case, filed by a group of Ohio attorneys was dismissed on the grounds of national security by the DOJ, so the merits were never considered. That suit was against Kaiser Hill--the so called clean up the mess contractor on the $ 7 billion( with a B) clean up gravy train deals. The DOJ has a lot of control over qui tam actions, and can tinker with the qui tam plaintiff. Just look at Jim Stone.... he was accorded to have no "knowledge", after the process ran its dark course. It took 18 years for that zapping process to vaporize Jim Stone--an top notch engineer. One can only imagine what it did to Stone's $ 10 million New York attorneys--left high and dry, and barred on jurisdictional grounds from getting any legal fees from Rockwell. Why a suit(qui tam) against Kaiser Hill was subject to national securtiy(per DOJ manipulations), and one against Rockwell was not raises continuing questions. Patty Calhoun(W-word) knows about "Pondcrete", that was not a national top secret, and so did the Boulder Daily Camera---its disclosures used to bar the Stone qui tam action---IN COURT. The Press tubed Stone's qui tam action, part of the reason Stone was never made whole. The flaky 1986 False Claims Act set up that means to use the Press to hurt qui tam plaintiffs--so they are pounded into the ground. Even, the Boulder Daily Camera called for amendments to that Act to prevent that abuse in the future. Westword-Village Magazine is still playing cute word games--"carved"--to even genuinely care about the abuses that happned to Stone. Why should it care, it makes a ton of money on Sex ads with its demographcs on its circulation profiles. Besides, the attorneys who got left high and dry were from New York, and after all Denver is a big pro corporate bar kinda PLACE---and Kaiser Hill is laughing all the way to BIG BANKS. Lets rename the Broncos the: NUKIES......to honor the nuclear heists that are so a part of Colorado's history in not accounting for 62 pounds of deadly plutonium; MISSING-and unaccounted for.

  • Lon 05/09/2007 1:04:00 PM

    There seems to be some clique of lobbyists and attorneys who do not want a real False Claims Act, like the one in Ab Lincoln's times. It had no jurisdictional bars. NONE Jim Stone got caught up in the bait put out by Senator Grassley, as he was rendered as one who brought a "parasitical" law suit. Charles Grassley the, KING of parasites, and his court jester clowns---who have hurt so many citizens. What does the main Paul Weiss attorney(NYC) tell the Stone family--- about Jim Stone being branded a "smuggler", the ruling of the Supreme Court ? American must ask, and wonder ! How many families would like their Father to be consumed in a legal action for 18 years, and at the end of it he has carved in him " Claims Smuggler". Has Chuck Grasssley no decency---he allowed this bait job to go on to hurt many besides the Stone family(in Colorado). Now, we know where all that big PAC $$$$$ goes--- GOP Senators, the con job to undermine a real Lincoln Law, then lie and con America. How much longer will this BIG CON go on ?

  • Holland 05/09/2007 12:48:00 AM

    Senator Grassley filed a so called amicus breif in the Stone case before the Supreme Court. It was one pathetic piece of rubbish. He goes on about parasatical suits, his notion of a qui tam plaintiff being a parasite. Congress via people liek Grassley dumps $ 78 million in the laps of the lawyers for Rockwell, and he is demeaning and smearing quyi tam citizens as parasitical, parasites. How disgusting. The outfit from Texas who joined in the Grassley brief has some ex DOJ attorney. Stones attorneys purportedly drop millions on the suit, and then Stone gets branded a "claims smuggler" and a parasite. Ab Lincoln was a real trial attorney, now some brokers who never have trials in qui tam actions, and want to broker are going along with the Grassley sham. How utterly pathetic. Grassley is really catering to the corporate bar(for BIG CORPORATIONS) to deter real trial attorneys from coming forward to represent citizens--be real stand up guys for some poor citizen like Stone---in COURT. Shame on those(so called ESQUIRES) attorneys who promote this notion of Jim Stone being a parasite, or people like Stone. Grassley must have some shyster club he is looking for PAC $$$$$, in his games. Any bit of info can knock out a qui tam action, as Grassley turned the press against those who go into Court to seek to protect USA accounts. What a sham. The boulder Daily Camera who published stuf on Rocky Flats had an op-ed theat Grasslesy law is bad, and needs to be amended as soo as possoible

  • Mike 05/08/2007 10:51:00 AM

    Anthony Scalia has made assorted comments showing his bias, so as not to be impartial in judging qui tam cases. Plus, he came from the DOJ, who has had several high officials who have promoted animosity towards qui tam plaintiffs(which Jim Stone was). Several major system failures happened at Rocky Flats to badly endanger people in Bromfield area. America now seems to have a Supreme Court, who is fixed on protecting large corporations who take billions out of the USA coffers, and leave citizens, sludge, and pollutants to harm the taxpayers. As a citizen, I feel like I am being shaken down by people like Scalia, who takes from society, and provides it little protection from greedy crooked corporations. Congress needs to amend the law so that Scalia is limited in his abusive treatment of people like Jim Stone

  • Saladano 05/07/2007 11:43:00 PM

    After the big New York firm got through, & the dust settled Jim Stone never even appeared to resemble a human being, and was accorded to have no key knoweledge, was not able to possess knowledge key to what was litigated. At one time he was a talented engineer---who was inside the Security Gates, working at Rocky Flats. Case turned out to like some Mayan offering to teh high GODS, a modern day abortion to suck Stone in, and put him through a judicial meat grinder. Is there some cute Latin phrases to sprinkle over this carnage ? The $ 78 million in hard cold cash dumped in the lap of the attorneys for Rockwell, gratis of the U S tax payers as foisted off by Congress, proves big mega money can dehumanize any person who dares to try and confront the defrauding of U S accounts.

  • Winston 05/07/2007 3:34:00 PM

    The FBI and the clients of Paul Weiss (LAW FIRM). Scooter Libby goes to the FBI in 2003, and is interviwed. Based on those FBI interviews, he ends up getting criminally indicted.(OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE) Jim Stone goes to the FBI in the 1980's, and 20 years later he is ruled to be a "claims suuggler" by the Supreme Court. The FBI testified in the criminal trial leading to the 2007 conviction of Scooter Libby. Seems YELLOW Cake, plutonium, and fall out has crossed the path of Paul Weiss in the saga of two clients: One with vast power: Scooter Libby a White House Advisor, & Chief of Staff to V.P Cheney. The other: Jim Stone with no power jacked around in the way he was mistreated, in the fall out from matters at the Denver area nuclear bomb trigger facility. Marc Rich, a metals trader, had Libby as his lawyer, and recently ex President Clinton, is rumored to have met with Rich in Davos Switzerland. So, where was the FBI in court in live testimony in the Stone matter ? Seems this mystery hangs over the Stone matter, although Mr Stone passed away, after he was branded a claims "smuggler"(civil proceedings). Patrick Fitzgerald(DOJ) who convicted Libby, noted, the truth is key to the U. S. justice system, if it is robbed, or stolen from the justice system, the U S justice system can not properly function, and can breakdown(words to that effect). Where was the FBI in the Stone case ? America wonders. This mystery hovers over the issues, as workers at Rocky Flats claim they were subjected to nuclear pollution to kill them, or do them serious harm, to undermine their lives.

  • Brenda 05/07/2007 2:04:00 PM

    Mr Stone's discharge in Colorado from the subject corporation, indeed raised questions, serious ones given the health, and safety matters at risk. Those are now acutely back in the news(2007) given the number of workers who died, and suffered nuclear pollution impacts from people playing with their lives in Colorado. Note: CHAPTER 7(from http://www.etl-inc.com/docs/50_state_Survey_discharge_Law.PDF 50-STATE SURVEY OF WRONGFUL DISCHARGE LAW � 7.1 I. RECENT TRENDS &DEVELOPMENTS This chapter surveys wrongful discharge law throughout the United States. Almost every state recognizes various legislative and judicially defined exceptions to the general rule that employment can be terminated at the will of the employer. The exceptions discussed in this chapter generally fall into one or more of the following categories: (1) an express or implied contract to discharge only for cause; (2) a judicially recognized public policy prohibiting discharge in particular circumstances; and (3) an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The states vary considerably in the extent to which they recognize these exceptions. In addition, certain common law claims are recognized which, in some circumstances, substitute for or supplement claims of wrongful discharge.a IN particular, � 7.3.6(b)COLORADO Public Policy Exceptions Colorado recognizes a public policy exception to the at-will employment contract.132 An at-will employee will establish a prima facie case for wrongful discharge under the public policy exception if the employee presents evidence that: � the employer directed him to perform an illegal act as part of his work-related duties; or the employer prohibited him from performing a public duty or exercising an important job-related right or privilege; � the employer directed him to take action that would violate a specific statute relating to public health, safety, or welfare, or would undermine a clearly expressed public policy relating to the employee�s basic responsibility as a citizen or his right or privilege as a worker; 1533 (D. Colo. 1994) (manual stated, �It is presented as a matter of information only and its contents should not be interpreted as a contract between the company and any of its employees.�); Therrien v. United Airlines, Inc., 670 F. Supp. 1517, 1522 (D. Colo. 1987) (manual stated that it did not create a contract of employment and that all employment remained �at will� and subject to termination by the employer at anytime); Evenson v. Colorado Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., 879 P.2d 402, 409 (Colo. Ct. App. 1993) (jury question created where disclaimer inconspicuous and disciplinary proceedings regarded as mandatory). 127 920 P.2d 820, 826 (Colo. Ct. App. 1995), aff�d, 943 P.2d 431 (Colo. 1997). 128 See, e.g., Pickell v. Arizona Components Co., 931 P.2d 1184 (Colo. 1997) (employer had induced the employee to give up her previous employment by promising continued future employment, benefits, higher compensation, and financial support sufficient to ensure her new office operations); Calhoun v. Ball Corp., 866 F. Supp. 473 (Colo. 1995). But see McGuire v. Continental Airlines, 210 F.3d 1141, 1147 (10th Cir. 2000) (promissory estoppel claim failed because employee did not rely to his detriment on employer�s disciplinary and appeal procedure). 129 Pickell v. Arizona Components Co., 931 P.2d 1184, 1186 (Colo. 1997). 130 Dorman v. Petrol Aspen, Inc., 914 P.2d 909, 915 (Colo. 1996) (an offer of employment listing salaries for prospective years of employment and a promise of a future right to purchase stock was held to be sufficiently ambiguous to create a question of fact as to whether the parties agreed to employment for a definite term). 131 Lawson v. Science Applications Int�l Corp (SAIC), 894 F. Supp. 378, 379-80 (D. Colo. 1995). 132 Rocky Mountain Med. Ctr., 916 P.2d at 523.)

  • Johnny B 05/06/2007 3:16:00 PM

    Stone was the only one charged: A "claims smuggler"--the Scalia indictment to smear Stone. Guess that will teach people about how the FBI operates with the DOJ--and East Coast POWER Sure, Stone "smuggled" in some seem to infer from high places $ 10 million worth of legal services, and what they mostly did from New York hot shot legal circles is amend the complaint(filed in Colorado), to drive a "wedge" between Stone and any sense of justice to make this poor Colorado citizen a target for the worst kind of FLIM FLAMS. How does Stone get removed the awful smear of being branded a smuggler being associated with his name---TELL us Coloradoan's, please Senator Grassley--while we see 100's of Rocky Flats workers die from the sludges of plutonium spread around Jefferson County.

  • Bill 05/06/2007 6:26:00 AM

    Westword makes it sound, like Stone was fired because he gave some Rockwell manager the "finger". Stone was an engineer, and he was concerned with the shoddy manner of handling nuclear material/ waste. Jim Stone's life of what he did, having worked at Rocky Flats and seen the questionable practices--at the site-- seems to have been made the target of a joke. If people in Colorado, or with his law firms in Court really cared about him why didn't they put in the record all that reflected his concerns. Neither Stone or the FBI people he met with testified in live testimony--in Court. What came across was little caring for Jim Stone---as a "person"-- so as to be reflected in the record. That made it easy for Anthony Scalia to write off Jim Stone. Justice Scalia in another case showed vast hostility towards qui tam actions---as "opportunities for shakedowns". Scalia had a preconceived bias to begin with, and he cut Stone to pieces to make him as if her never existed in any real sense at all in the case. Stone was the plaintiff, not the Boulder Daily Camera. Sad, how Stone was vaporized in the manner he was.

  • Brian 05/05/2007 8:06:00 PM

    Jim Stone's attorneys were with Paul Weiss, a big law firm located in New York City Washingotn D. C., having over 400 lawyers, from the top law schools in America: a big corporate law firm, deep into the financial areas in WALL STREET DEALS, etc. If they got rolled and zeroed out, after putting in over $ 10 million into the case, what would be the implications to many small, or smaller law firms ? However, Rockwell was found to have violated federal laws by a jury. So, the point seems to be to do as much finanical harm as possible to any law firm who takes a qui tam action. That is the sham set up by Senator Grassley---he has no clue about Federal courts, never practiced in any as a professional lawyer---trial lawyer. However, if a law firm won't diligently take or pursue one of these cases( IN FEDERAL COURT), then entities, & corporations will get away bilking USA taxpayer accounts. And, then USA accouns are ripped off and the massive fraud is not rectified. That is really the result of Chuck Grassley's nutty 1986 law, which does more to protect crooks, and deter genuine justice in America. Apparently, Mr Stone never had any law firm in Colorado stand up for him in any diligent ways, to follow through on key aspects of damage to him--his persoanl suit--causes of action. Westword claims it was an "orginal sin", what happened to Jim Stone. However, what about just wrongful discharge and retaliation from Rockwell, how come that was not rectifed by any attorneys in America to stand up for justice for Jim Stone. Those questions are crying out for answers, and they have not been fully answered, and that is part of the tragedy of what happened to Jim Stone--seemingly swept under the rug, to be hidden so no real accountability. Why is that not addressed in Colorado, where Rocky Flats is located ? Citizens should demand Congress look into this sorry mess, to demand full sunshine on all aspects of matters.

  • Moshe 05/04/2007 9:44:00 PM

    Denver federal Court is the capital of people coming up short: 1) U S. ex rel Maxwell v. Kerr Mcgee A jury verdict of over $`7 million. Just tossed out on a technacility to bankrupt Mr Maxwell, bar his attorneys from being made whole on millions put in the case to help the USA, who had its accounts stolen blind by big oil cheats. matter going to APPEAL court, 10th Circuit in 2007... 2) U S. ex rel Stone v Rockwell. A $ 4 million jury verdict. Sup Crt tosses suit as to Stone being a plaintiff after 18 years. Causes Stones attorneys to be zeroed out of over $ 10 million in attorney fees to cause vast harm of any who stand up in qui tam actions: Pondcreted 3) Jack Grynberg matter See Fighting Mad, by WestWord. It notes a DOJ attorney ordered Grynberg to file on 73 oil corporations or his qui tam suit(s) would be tossed. from the get -go Grynberg spends over 10 years in court, and according to Westword article spent over $ 20 million of his own money His recovery to be made whole... about ZERO..Like bankruptcy city, almost unless a ZILLIONaire..and qui tam plainitts are mostly citizens who hardly have a pot to WIZZ IN. The point: qui tam actions to help the USA protect its accounts that are being stolen blind--mostly bankrupts qui tam people, and their attorneys. The above are just matters in Colorado, all around the USA qui tam plaintiffs are being seriously financially damaged. A situation of betrayal is what it is. Why is this matter being so covered up on how qui tam plaintiffs and ther attorneys are getting rolled, duped, and harmed, a lot of that situation coming from the way the DOJ is run under Mr torture memo Alberto GONZ, and the Bush Administration, and assorted DOJ political animals, going on now for some time. The 1986 False Claims Act needs to be renamed : The financial destruction Act for qui tam plaintiffs. Charles Grassley(so called U S Senator) a Iowa hog farmer is leading people to be slaughtered in the qui tam world. He is too blind to care, and has no clue on how the 1986 False Claims Act is a farce that protects vast billions in fraud.. It protected Rockwell in Colorado, as nuclear pollution spread all around to kill 100's of workers. Qui tam attorneys are getting slaughtered, are they too proud to figure out the deck is stacked, and get a real Linclon Law, or do the like the fake sham that allows the above....

  • Java 05/04/2007 3:13:00 PM

    Westword's "Carved in Stone" says that Stone's attorneys want a resolution from the 2 Colorado Senator's( U S Senators), & that Jim Stone(now his estate) should get a share of some money from the Government. Since this is being made a public issue on public money--more real answers are truly warranted. However, if Stone sued Rockwell what happened to Stone's attorneys in ther legal action against Rockwell ? Why was that missing from the Westword PIECE of the CARVED IN STONE. For instance, in Colorado on the wrongful dischage cause of action, why did Stone's attorneys not prevail on that ? May American citizens dare ask--- since it is some issue now to Congress ? Also, the 1986 False Claims Act has a cause of action for wrongful discharge and retaliation under 31 U S. C. 3730(h), part of the 1986 False Claims Act. Why did Stone's attorneys not plead some diligent case against Rockwell on that to prevail to get a judgement against Rockwell--(a judgement from Courts in Colorado), & against the alleged bad guys. Instead Stones($ 10 Milllion billing attorneys) now seem to want Congress to issue up some resolution for some FED Government money(which it will take a big cut of) Westword states in its pieces quoting one of Stone's attorneys: "Mr Stone's career was ruined because of his reporting crimes at Rocky Flats"... Please Westword, or Mr Stone's attorneys explain to us why the laws dealing with employees who work on federal contracts did not work to protect Mr Stone to redress all the wrongs...(you are OFFICERS OF THE COURT), did you not stand up in court for your client--Mr Jim Stone... ? what ?? you have now made this an issue before Congress. The People of Colorado sure deserve some answers from Stone's attorneys--but will they not speak to us, citizens- if they can't send us a big bill ? Please Westword, give us--American taxpayers--the real answers, the ones not addressed in your CARVED IN STONE PIECE ! Congress provided the means to have taxpayer money to the tune of $ 78 million go to Rockwell's attorneys. Then, no money was awarded in any judgement against Rockwell in any suit brought by Stone's attorneys... is there something missing in the Westword piece that does not explain all to the U S taxpayers. Indeed many questions remain unanswered on Rocky Flats, and its milking machine of the American taxpayers. After Westword's many words on this, why is so much still left out to deal with some major unanswered questions---now that so much public money was at issue --and is at issue ?

  • Rolando 05/03/2007 9:01:00 PM

    Why did the DOJ egg on the Stone attorneys to spend so much money, after entering the case,particulary after none of the representation was for Mr Stone on any personal causes of action from New York Law advocates on any cause of action for wrongful discharge, and retaliation, or tampering with civil rights of a witness in Colorado ? The DOJ was very good at sweeping the time of some New York attorneys into some DOJ camp( its D. C. operations as run by Bush Administration and other political level DOJ higher ups), but if any check the name of the person who had his name on the documents that was Jim Stone. I wonder if the DOJ just duped the attorneys for Mr Stone. It is a fact, Stone was fired, after he expressed concerns on the way nuclear materials were being mishandled, and the range of retaliation against him seems staggering, as if he was made a target, for some who wanted this matter swept under the rug. How can we loose site that laws are suppose to be for the protection of the society of people in Colorado ! Stone seems to have been merely offered up as a target for those in power to throw rocks at him to attack him, as if he was not even an American citizen.

  • Bruce 05/03/2007 4:53:00 AM

    Most law firms if they had expended $ 10 million, & put in a case, and were never made whole, would be put out of business. KAPUT TIME. That seems to be the message, to so deter law firms from taking cases as a form of economic coercion. Wonder if any saw those New York lawyers at Jim Stone's memorial(he died shortly after the Scalia decsion came out), on Sat April 28th, my impression was, they did not show up. Senator Grassley really showed that he came up with a totally nutty ACT, to hurt people who will in large measure never be made whole. He should rename the ACT-- the financal destruction of Citizens ACT--who would ever become a QUI TAM plaintiff. Senator Grassley is a big leach, and a giant PARASITE, he has destroyed 1,000's of citizens since 1986--(ex qui tam plaintiffs), but he could care less; he is so callous, and blind, and COLD-- STONE COLD INDIFFERENCE. Grassley has no clue how federal courts work, he is a pawn of big corporations who have defrauded federal accounts, and so many of his GOP Senator buddies fill their political coffers with massive PAC $$$$ from such outfits. His speeches are deceptive, people better wake up on this travesty.

  • Newty 05/03/2007 4:02:00 AM

    Lawyers for Jim Stone spent 18 years in court, and they claim they spent $ 10 million bucks, and at the end(March 2007) the effect of the ruling was that Stone was not an "original source" and so deemed Jim Stone as having brought a "parasitical" legal action( Supreme Court decree, issued by Antonia Scalia)... Ok, what other source brought a civil legal action on the matters at issue--in COURT ? None !. Why did his lawyers(PAUL WEISS in New York) if they were so smart spend $ 10 million big bucks, to have their client branded as a "parasite"( --"parasitical action"), and then smeared as a "claims smuggler". The Boulder Daily Camera never had a claim in Court. Maybe Jude Miller or Time can claim source-hood (undisclosed) just to tube qui tam actions, some new industry, as road-blocks to help crooks ripe off the U S treasury. Some ruse is set up to have News papers as a way to tube legal actions for people at risk--if ever go into Court. The news paper never testified in court. This legal vodoo is really a reflection of how insane our legal system has become to produce unaccountability to protect those who defraud federal accounts. It figures that Antonia Scalia would write the rubbish, given his bias for corporations who defraud USA accounts, as we now see vast trillions in red ink to bankrupt this Nation. Ab Lincoln must be rolling in his grave, as the 1986 False Claims Act is a trap, designed to protect fraud, bankrupt whistleblowers, and it will now deter most law firms from even accepting a qui tam case, after seeing how the big New York Law Firm was made a total fool as if on a fools errand. But, can some now say, Stone had fools for lawyers, imagine spending $ 10 million to have a client branded and smeared as a "smuggler". Staggering.

  • Bobbie 05/02/2007 8:00:00 PM

    Mr Jim Stone never testifed in the hearings(qui tam via live testimony) in federal court, as his Big Apple(NY) attorney Vullo(Paul Weiss) had to sheepishly admit to Judge Scalia. Also, FBI Guy Jon Lipsky never testified--and had been shipped out of Denver, after he got cross ways with DOJ higher-ups. Mr Stone has been fired in 1986 because he had expressed dire concerns to Rockwell about its crappy practices playing with deadly plutonium--and its shoddy disposal modes, which still are of concerns to many in Colorado. He did that before he went to the FBI(Denver) and spoke to the FBI about the gross violations of U. S laws. What happened in this case to silence and bury Mr Stone as a non-person, should be alarming to every citizen in Colorado. Westword, takes off on how Scalia(the Supreme Court) carved some citizen up(Stone). The real message is: Making people non-persons, un-citizens, disinfranchized Americans. It goes beyond merely Jim Stone. May this good decent honest courageous man rest in peace from the disgraceful injustice to which he had been subjected, and the shoddy legal process that made a sham, and a joke of genuine justice in Colorado(USA)

  • Randy 05/02/2007 4:09:00 PM

    WestyWord's "Carved in Stone" totally misses the point. The case in federal courts was never about Jim Stone, he was never called as a live witness in federal court in any qui tam matter, and is now deceased. His attorney's the so called P. I. ones thought so little of him while he was alive, they never diligently pursued a wrongful firing and retaliation claim in federal court, at the first instance, to prejudice Jim Stone. Rather, the case dragged on, with little being done on the real major problems at Rocky Flats so a big New York Law firm could run a meter for a $ 10 million lawyer fees claim. What a shame, maybe they can explain why a retaliation , and wrongful discharge claim was not filed in federal court in a timely manner for Jim Stone---since Jim Stone's wife's name is now on the case, and Rocky Flats still has a lot of plutonium missing, never fully accounted for. Colorado is not Niger, or the Congo, can't we get some full answers here---in this State in the USA ? Instead, Westword seems more interested in being cute with its "Carved" piece as if Stone was just some guy who got carved up by some judicial machine, that is blind to his even being in Colorado--at Rocky Flats, as a real live witness. Just one never called in federal court in his qui tam action for any live testimony, as the FBI did what ?????? Ask you Senator to see if they can get more answers, because so much is below the radar still on this matter.

  • Ram 05/01/2007 6:17:00 PM

    Sammy and other Bronco fans: you noted the 62 Ibs of plutonium missing from Rocky Flats. Actually, to be more to the facts, it is 2600 pounds, which had a value of over $ 140 million. This was brought out in the class action law suit. Maybe the DOJ, and FBI don't care about over $ 140 million in missing USA property ? The questions raised on the Stone matter are: if a good citizen goes to the FBI, will he be betrayed , and jacked around, to pondcrete that person. Mr Stone got jacked around, no two ways around that tragedy. Can't the U S Government protect people who come forward to the FBI...or is the uncaring in that area the real scandal. Stone got SCALIA-ED, which must mean in Scilian stabbed in the back in some shadow like world of the way things work when people in Colorado go to the DENVER FBI..which is subject to orders by D. C. FBI/ DOJ and Rove etc.; BUSHY world as it operates with assorted PUPPET MASTERS.

  • Lonny 04/27/2007 11:00:00 PM

    Colorado has always had an anti-worker climate. Jim Stone reported crimes, violations of serious laws to protect the public. And, he apparently refused to carry out orders to be apart of breaking the laws. It appears something happened in Colorado to undermine and sabotage his rights. However, in the climate that exists in Colorado, it appears some want to make it so breaking the law is a mere means to harras people like Jim Stone. Perhaps, Senator Grassley may wonder---what really happened to Jim Stone---we now read in the Denver Post April 27th, 2007 the death and illness all around Colorado as to workers who were mere fodder for the nuclear death machine; Rocky Flats. Yet, the games to silence Jim Stone seem to remain largely unexamined. I imagine selling a lot of body-perfume oils takes a higher priority at Westword, but CARVED in STONE, only points up the injustice from an uncaring legal community in Denver, who seems to have a low standard of care to some clients, perhaps below the bar of what is acceptable

  • Morgan 04/26/2007 9:00:00 PM

    What a great way for Anthony Scalia to protect fraud for the big GOP PAC guys, big corporations. Tampering with witnesses or potential ones, is now sanctioned, just fire 'em, so then it sets up a defense that they were fired when the really big bilkings were going on, and they were locked out of the corporate headquarters. This is so very clever, it now will be part of the new corporate management practices. Also, it sure taught Mr Rockwell trouble maker a lesson, going to the FBI was a way to have Rockwell use the FBI/ DOJ as the wedge to drive a knife in his back. Where did Scalia learn this OMERTA CODE, must be some deep rooted juris secondum thing he employed to take Stone down. Some kinda say it was all legal, too, just steam rolling Stone, and Congress set it all up, in its TRAP the whistlebower Sting; THE SMUGGLER BRANDED... Ruining people truly is a major sport in the world of federal contracting. Look the other way, and keep your mouth shut is the message big TONY is sending out..... THE CODE of SILENCE has been given new life.....All the big DOD conractors raise a TOAST..Way to go BIG TONY....You are our GUY in black robes.

  • Harry 04/25/2007 1:47:00 AM

    Half life, radiating out of the CARVED STONE piece, is a misnomer in terms of viable life(human health), just as pondcrete is misnomer in terms of solid nuclear containment. How Anthony Scalia transposed the cement ratios, the piping rates, the sludge factors, speaks volumes on his over-reaching to produce a result to find against Jim Stone, a real Engineer. If anything his decision demonstrates, how he is biased for large corporations, against citizens. This should greatly concern Congress

  • Richie 04/24/2007 11:47:00 PM

    Don't kid yourself, the Denver area has made big bucks on nuclear pollution. $ 78 million just to pay the mouth piece lawyers, to pop out all the motions, all the technical defenses, all the years of delay, that so clogged the dockets. Ironic, Mr Stone is put up as having carved in him some of that Denver justice, next day he dies( 4/11/07). While WMD's may not have been found in Iraq, a lot of NUKEY harm impacts were sure found in the crippled bodies of workers strung around the Denver area. Just some collaterial damage, as Stone was just one more person hardly consider a life in Denver as if workers lives in Denver are considered real cheap. It is amazing that the Broncos re not renamed the NUKIES.

  • Vulga 04/23/2007 5:42:00 PM

    In 1987, Jim Stone goes to the FBI. In March 2007, 20 years later he is ruled "a claims smuggler" by the U. S. Supreme Court. Guess that will teach people not to snitch, when nuclear pollution is being spread around on the west Side of Denver. Seems now the Supreme Court is in sync with rap songs on staying away from the heat(FBI, and EPA, and ICE, and etc. Look how the legal process chewed up Jim Stone. But, there is big money in nuclear pollution near State HWY 93, and 72, that confluence of power. May Jim Stone rest in peace after he was badly mistreated by a shoddy legal system.

  • Lonnie 04/17/2007 5:07:00 AM

    The biggest "orignal sin" is how qui tam actions are barred. The Dept of Justice does not intervene in about 75 % of qui tam actions filed on the DOJ(AG..like AG Alberto Mr political Honcho, Bush Admin), and many of those are barred on jurisdictional grounds.. The DOJ has used its vast lobby power in conjunction with large corporations to produce ar measure that badly uses citizens to suck them in and hut them, and most are never made "whole". Jim Stone is only one of 1,000's.

  • Sheila 04/14/2007 8:48:00 PM

    Jim Stone was falsely accused of being a "claims smuggler" in the dicey March 27, 2007 high court Scalia ruling. There was no other claims in the form of allegations except those of Jim Stone-- filed in federal court. Only through the most vile trickey was Jim Stone set up to steal his personhood, to then subject him, and his family to the worst form of legal charades. Mr Stone's passing is not likely to put the important matters to rest. May Jim Stone rest in peace. We will morn his passing, he was a good decent caring man. But, we will not forget what happened to Jim Stone. Two words come to mind: Boston Chicken.....( it too has a Colorado presence) Paul Weiss can not write out Jim Stone as a natural person in Colorado....there must be full accountability to stand up to the travesity that unfoled here in this State. People in Colorado should demand nothing less. We must be on alert to assure people in this state are not rolled by ouside forces, who toy with our full citizenship.

  • Sammy 04/14/2007 10:22:00 AM

    Carved in Stone notes: "But plutonium has a half-life of 24,000 years." This is a misnomer created by engineers, plutonium in the human realm has no life, zero life. However this sad story about Jim Stone has more to do with him being accorded no life in the qui tam world that makes Bleak House, look like it was deep in the Denver and New York Legal communities. Mr Stone was never treated as a live witness, that he was. His case drug on, then the life slowly left Mr Stone, and although he died on April 11, 2007, the real indictment is yet to be issued on how the legal system failed Mr Stone. But Paul Weiss ( Stone's so called legal Esquires) now move on to represent Scooter Libby over the YELLOW CAKE caper, where its star client has a $ 5 million trust fund(filled by GOP fat kats in secret deals), big mula to tape into---- the saga of the Bush---W-- Administration war on regular government in America. Mr Stone saw massive wrong doing on an unparalleled level, he tried to report it, in the end he was silenced by an uncaring legal system, as Tony Scalia, the Tony Soprano of the Supreme Court, accorded Mr Stone no life as an American qui tam plaintiff, showing justice is not only blind but a total ass out of touch with the essence of life in America. The real indictment on how the legal system failed Mr Stone and America will come--- later. May Mr Stone rest in peace, He will be remembered as a man who cared, in a very uncaring world, and unfortunately a world were 62 pounds of plutonium ended up missing. So maybe Cheney and the W Administration could not find Yellow cake in Niger, the 62 pounds of plutonium could not be found at Rocky Flats. It ended up missing. And that is still a problem that won't go away.

  • Mitchell 04/13/2007 4:06:00 AM

    The Sacila ruling to negate people like Jim Stone from being a viable qui tam plaintiff witness is nothing less than a ruse to tamper with witnesses. The so called original sources were not the plaintiff, not the ones advancing vast money to pursue the case & most acutely--who filed the case, with attorneys Any bit of information can be misused to make illusory the promise for a whistleblower to be made whole. It is noting less than a from of extortion, and a protection device to those who defraud America, the effective result Tony Scalia has down more damage to Federal accounts than a gang of 25 La Cosa Nostra racketeering enterprises....This mouth piece to protect those who bilk USA accounts is a disgrace, but others on the Supreme Court bought into this travesty. It goes down as an example of how a Congressional statue can be twisted by Justices hostile to American citizens--who were in the Corporate bar, on in their camp for favors, before they started wearing black robes. Word has spread around Denver: Jim Stone passed away on April 11, 2007 God bless Jim Stone, this wonderful caring, genrous man, who was so mistreated by the U. S. justice system, to make it a MACHINE of INJUSTICE. Jim Stone was a great American. The current Supreme Court shows it is a tool of big corporations who so suck at the federal treasury, billions per year.

 
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy