A More Messages Correction

I was never very good at math, so it's no surprise that there's a computation glitch in my October 9 blog about the impending departure of Denver Post columnist Diane Carman. Luckily, Post veteran Bob Ewegen is helping me to sort it out. Here's the e-mail Ewegen sent my way,...
Carbonatix Pre-Player Loader

Audio By Carbonatix

Keep Westword Free

We’re aiming to raise $20,000 by April 26. Your support ensures Westword can continue watching out for you and our community. No paywall. Always accessible. Daily online and weekly in print.

$20,000

I was never very good at math, so it’s no surprise that there’s a computation glitch in my October 9 blog about the impending departure of Denver Post columnist Diane Carman. Luckily, Post veteran Bob Ewegen is helping me to sort it out. Here’s the e-mail Ewegen sent my way, which explains the botch very well:

Your article on Diane Carman erroneously states she would have received a year’s pay if she had taken the recent buyout. In fact, the year’s pay offer was limited to staffers with 20 years experience. Staffers over 50 with less than 20 years received one week’s pay for each six months of service. Diane came to The Post in 1989 and would have received about 36 weeks pay, not 52 as you wrote. Those who took the buyout had to leave by July 1 and if Diane is paid through Oct. 21, that’s 16 weeks she received. Thus, the net financial loss is about 20 week’s pay, significant but less than half of the year’s pay you said.

That said, we will all miss her immense talents and priceless contributions to The Post.

Regards,

Bob Ewegen

Thank you, sir, for setting me straight. In the future, I’ll bring all my math problems straight to you. — Michael Roberts

GET MORE COVERAGE LIKE THIS

Sign up for the News newsletter to get the latest stories delivered to your inbox

Loading latest posts...