Audio By Carbonatix
Keep Westword Free
We’re $3,000 away from our spring campaign goal!
We’re aiming to raise $20,000 by April 26. Your support ensures Westword can continue watching out for you and our community. No paywall. Always accessible. Daily online and weekly in print.
Alan Prendergast’s update on a new Denver stormwater plan generated some interesting responses.
As Prendergast wrote, city planners “settled on Denver’s City Park Golf Course as the logical place to build a thirty-acre ‘detention area’ for stormwater runoff — a move that will involve closing the course for more than a year and bulldozing hundreds of trees.”
Those who support the approach focused on the golf course closure, suggesting that the interests of duffers shouldn’t trump safety considerations.
Here’s a roundup of replies.
Jayson Vonfreizer writes:
Golf… The game of the white, privileged or rich individuals….
That land would be better suited as a park for all, or even housing….
Aaron Schulz writes:
Oh no! One of the many golf courses will be closed??!! #richwhitepeooleproblems
Andrei Andronescu writes:
Yes, because a golf course is more important than important storm-water management.
Bill Menezes writes:
Can’t they just flood the whole thing and use it to stage mock sea battles?
