Reader: Anne Geddes calendars are child porn? Really?

Chris Utterback's post about Representative Doug Lamborn's concern that a photo showing a five-year-old girl in polluted water constituted child porn has generated lots of debate, as well as some fascinating takes on misreadings of perfectly acceptable material. This reminiscence is a case in point...
Carbonatix Pre-Player Loader

Audio By Carbonatix

Chris Utterback’s post about Representative Doug Lamborn’s concern that a photo showing a five-year-old girl in polluted water constituted child porn has generated lots of debate, as well as some fascinating takes on misreadings of perfectly acceptable material.

This reminiscence is a case in point.

Peggotysue writes:

My mother used to work for a book distributor, and she got a call one day from a woman who was very upset to have just opened a big box full of child porn. Turned out it was a bunch of Anne Geddes calendars — (that the woman had ordered). On the cover was a naked baby with angel wings. Some people have so much vile crap in their head, they can’t see the forest for the trees.

GET MORE COVERAGE LIKE THIS

Sign up for the This Week’s Top Stories newsletter to get the latest stories delivered to your inbox

Follow and like the Michael Roberts/Westword Facebook page.

For more memorable takes, visit our Comment of the Day archive.

Loading latest posts...