Reader: Pot edibles hater Maureen Dowd should stick with what she knows — booze and pills

Our recent post about New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd's bad experience with pot edibles, which she suggested be stamped with a skull and bones (maybe a joke, maybe not), got a lot of folks talking. Here's a comment from a reader who thinks Dowd may be better off using...
Carbonatix Pre-Player Loader

Audio By Carbonatix

Our recent post about New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd’s bad experience with pot edibles, which she suggested be stamped with a skull and bones (maybe a joke, maybe not), got a lot of folks talking. Here’s a comment from a reader who thinks Dowd may be better off using substances that are more familiar to her in the future.

Shari Walsh writes:

Edibles are an alternate way to consume marijuana. On the ones I have purchased, there is an advisory to wait one to two hours for the effects. There is also a guide on what one portion is and the dosage of THC in it. I can read. It seems pretty simple to me. Candy is dandy, but liquor is quicker. Maybe she just stick to what she knows…alcohol and prescription drugs.

Send your story tips to the author, Michael Roberts.

For more memorable takes, visit our Comment of the Day archive.

GET MORE COVERAGE LIKE THIS

Sign up for the News newsletter to get the latest stories delivered to your inbox

Loading latest posts...