Additional images below.
Additional images below.
Thinkstock

Twelve Best U.S. Cities to Find a Job — and Where Denver Finishes

As we recently reported, Colorado added 100,986 residents in 2015, landing it in second position among fastest-growing states.

The lifestyle and scenery in Colorado are two big reasons why, and marijuana legalization is likely a factor, too.

But another influence is the economy — and specifically the job market, which continues to heat up.

A new study by WalletHub ranks the best and worst U.S. cities to find a job, and Denver finished on the positive end of that continuum.

Look below to count down the top twelve, featuring photos and WalletHub data, followed by the methodology the site used to determine the rankings. To see the original WalletHub post, click here.

Plano, Texas.
Plano, Texas.
YouTube file photo

Number 1: Plano, TX
Total Score: 68.12
Job Market Rank: 2
"Socioeconomic Environment" Rank: 8

Overland Park, Kansas.
Overland Park, Kansas.
YouTube file photo

Number 2. Overland Park, KS
Total Score: 66.18
Job Market Rank: 5
"Socioeconomic Environment" Rank: 4

Austin, Texas.
Austin, Texas.
YouTube file photo

Number 3. Austin, TX
Total Score: 65.10
Job Market Rank: 4
"Socioeconomic Environment" Rank: 15

Irving, Texas.
Irving, Texas.
Courtesy photo

Number 4: Irving, TX
Total Score: 64.75
Job Market Rank: 1
"Socioeconomic Environment" Rank: 73

Salt Lake City, Utah.
Salt Lake City, Utah.
YouTube file photo

Number 5: Salt Lake City, UT
Total Score: 64.20
Job Market Rank: 3
"Socioeconomic Environment" Rank: 37

Des Moines, Iowa.
Des Moines, Iowa.
YouTube file photo

Number 6: Des Moines, IA
Total Score: 64.05
Job Market Rank: 6
"Socioeconomic Environment" Rank: 23

Irvine, California.
Irvine, California.
YouTube

Number 7: Irvine, CA
Total Score: 64.03
Job Market Rank: 7
"Socioeconomic Environment" Rank: 14

Madison, Wisconsin.
Madison, Wisconsin.
YouTube file photo

Number 8: Madison, WI
Total Score: 63.56
Job Market Rank: 11
"Socioeconomic Environment" Rank: 2

Sioux Falls, South Dakota.
Sioux Falls, South Dakota.
YouTube file photo

Number 9: Sioux Falls, SD
Total Score: 63.42
Job Market Rank: 8
"Socioeconomic Environment" Rank: 9

Omaha, Nebraska.
Omaha, Nebraska.
YouTube file photo

Number 10: Omaha, NE
Total Score: 61.91
Job Market Rank: 17
"Socioeconomic Environment" Rank: 6

Boise, Idaho.
Boise, Idaho.
YouTube file photo

Number 11: Boise, ID
Total Score: 61.88
Job Market Rank: 18
"Socioeconomic Environment" Rank: 1

Denver, Colorado.
Denver, Colorado.
YouTube file photo

Number 12: Denver, CO
Total Score: 61.00
Job Market Rank: 13
"Socioeconomic Environment" Rank: 19

Methodology

To find the best and worst job markets in the U.S., WalletHub’s analysts compared the 150 most populated cities across two key dimensions, “Job Market” and “Socioeconomic Environment.” We assigned a heavier weight to the former as these factors most heavily influence a job seeker’s decision in terms of relocation for employment.

With regard to our sample, please note that “city” refers to city proper and excludes surrounding metro areas.

Next, we compiled 17 relevant metrics, which are listed below with their corresponding weights. Each metric was given a value between 0 and 100, wherein 100 is the best value for that metric and 0 is the worst. Data for metrics marked with an asterisk (*) were available only at the state level and therefore received only half a weight.

Finally, we calculated the overall score for each city and ranked them using the weighted average across all metrics.

Job Market — Total Points: 80
Job Opportunities (number of job openings divided by number of unemployed residents): Double Weight (~14.55 Points)
Employment Growth (rate of annual job growth, adjusted for working-age population growth): Double Weight (~14.55 Points)
Monthly Median Starting Salary (adjusted for cost of living): Full Weight (~7.27 Points)
Unemployment Rate: Double Weight (~14.55 Points)
Industry Variety: Full Weight (~7.27 Points)
Full-Time Employment (number of part-time employees for every 100 full-time employees): Full Weight (~7.27 Points)
Percentage of Employed Residents Living Under the Poverty Line: Full Weight (~7.27 Points)
Disability Friendliness (percentage of persons with disabilities employed): Full Weight (~7.27 Points)

Socio-Economic Environment — Total Points: 20
Median Annual Income (adjusted for cost of living): Full Weight (~2.22 Points)
Time Spent Working & Commuting (average commute time and length of average workday): Full Weight (~2.22 Points)
Benefits (employees with private health insurance): Full Weight (~2.22 Points)
Housing Affordability: Full Weight (~2.22 Points)
Annual Transportation Costs: Full Weight (~2.22 Points)
Safety (crime rate): Full Weight (~2.22 Points)
WalletHub “Families” Ranking: Full Weight (~2.22 Points)
WalletHub “Singles” Ranking: Full Weight (~2.22 Points)
WalletHub “Recreation” Ranking: Full Weight (~2.22 Points)


From Our Sponsors

Newsletters

All-access pass to the top stories, events and offers around town.

  • Top Stories
    Send:

Newsletters

All-access pass to top stories, events and offers around town.

Sign Up >

No Thanks!

Remind Me Later >