Last week, we reported that a local lawyer was preparing a class action lawsuit against the City of Denver for violating the constitutional rights of the city's homeless population when conducting sweeps of homeless people, their encampments and their property.
Today, the law office of Jason Flores-Williams made good on its word, filing a class action complaint with the United States District Court in the District of Colorado (see the entire document below).
The filing lists nine plaintiffs to represent all relevant members of the city's homeless population. Among them are a few individuals whom Westword has interviewed during coverage of the sweeps, including Ray Lyall and Jerry Burton, who described what happened during the March 9 sweep of Resurrection Village, as well as Thomas Peterson, who was unable to reclaim his possessions at a downtown facility where the city kept confiscated items from the March sweeps before destroying them after sixty days.
Those named as defendants in the class action filing include: Mayor Michael Hancock, Police Chief Robert White, Denver Public Works Manager Jose Cornejo, Hancock Chief of Staff Evan Dreyer and District Six Police Commander Antonio Lopez.
We Believe Local Journalism is Critical to the Life of a City
Engaging with our readers is essential to Westword's mission. Make a financial contribution or sign up for a newsletter, and help us keep telling Denver's stories with no paywalls.
Support Our Journalism
The filing goes on to make the case that in the process of the sweeps, the city has violated homeless individuals' constitutional rights as outlined in the Fourth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.
When Westword reached out to the city for comment, Interim City Attorney Cristal DeHerrera responded, saying, "The City has not been served with a lawsuit by Denver Homeless Out Loud or Jason Flores-Williams. Once we receive the complaint, we will evaluate the claims and respond to them.”
Below, you can view the class action filing in its entirety, including the legal basis of its argument: