Denver Pit Bull Veto Override Vote Set for Next Week

The pit bull drama sparked by Mayor Michael Hancock's veto will go on for longer than initially thought.
The pit bull drama sparked by Mayor Michael Hancock's veto will go on for longer than initially thought.
Photo by Lucas Ludwig on Unsplash/YouTube file photo
Keep Westword Free
I Support
  • Local
  • Community
  • Journalism
  • logo

Support the independent voice of Denver and help keep the future of Westword free.

It has been widely reported (including by Westword) that the Denver City Council meeting scheduled for February 18 would include a vote to potentially override Mayor Michael Hancock's veto of a bill that would effectively repeal a ban on three pit bull-related breeds that's resulted in thousands of pits being euthanized since it was put in place circa 1989.

But, no. The vote has instead been set for the council meeting next Monday, February 24.

Why the delay? According to a city council representative, it's all about timing. Council staffers had expected Hancock to make the decision about what turned out to be the first veto of his mayoral tenure sooner than 5 p.m. Friday, February 14 — a time traditionally used by politicians to bury controversial news.

By the time Hancock's choice was made public, most council staffers had already left for the three-day Presidents' Day weekend. That made it logistically difficult to squeeze in what will almost certainly be an extended block of time needed to discuss, debate and re-vote. (The measure was originally approved by a 7-4 margin — one presumed opponent and one likely supporter were absent — and nine votes are required to override.) So for the convenience of legislators and members of the public on either side of the issue, the matter was bumped until February 24.

Council member Kevin Flynn offers a different explanation. "It’s not that we couldn’t fit in the time, but rather that our open meetings and notification requirement demands it," he says via email. "The agenda is published as of noon Thursdays, and with the veto coming afterward, we legally couldn’t make the requirement for notifying the public of the agenda item... although I’m sure there’s not a soul around, human or canine, who wouldn’t have known about it."

Whatever the case, the drama of what's currently the most-talked-about Denver story both locally and nationally will build for a week longer than originally expected. And given that Colorado Governor Jared Polis has already trolled Hancock over his move, a lot can happen between now and then.

Update: This post was updated at 5:19 a.m. on February 19 to include information from Denver City Council rep Kevin Flynn.

Keep Westword Free... Since we started Westword, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Denver, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Denver with no paywalls.

We use cookies to collect and analyze information on site performance and usage, and to enhance and customize content and advertisements. By clicking 'X' or continuing to use the site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. To find out more, visit our cookies policy and our privacy policy.


Join the Westword community and help support independent local journalism in Denver.


Join the Westword community and help support independent local journalism in Denver.